Lowcarbonconstruction: most-reported complaints
- Complaints in recent reviews
- 100% of 2 recent reviews analysed
- Most-reported issue
- Delivery late 100% of complaints
- Company replies
- 0% of negative reviews, typically within a day
- TrustScore
- 2.9 from 2 total reviews
- Review window analysed
- 2014-08-14 to 2021-09-16 2 reviews
- Sector
- Other sectors
Automated analysis of 2 public Trustpilot reviews published 2014-08-14 to 2021-09-16. TrustScore 2.9 from 2 total reviews — see the Trustpilot page. Quick answer: is Lowcarbonconstruction legit? Issues below reflect what reviewers reported, not findings of wrongdoing.
Reviewers most often report issues with delivery delays and faulty products. Both identified complaints cite late delivery, with one reviewer noting a nine-month installation period and broken promises. The sample size is too small to establish a clear trend for these issues.
Trustpilot lists this business as no longer collecting reviews. New reviews are not currently being gathered for its profile. See the Trustpilot page for the current status.
Not enough reviews to establish a trend.
What are the most common complaints about Lowcarbonconstruction?
| Issue | Share | Count | Trend | By month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delivery late | 100% | 2 | ||
| Faulty product | 100% | 2 |
Delivery late
2 reports · 100% of complaints“It took 9 months for this company to install my garden room with weekly broken delivery promises.”
1 reader marked this review helpful on Trustpilot.
“They delivered late, poor workmanship didn’t finish the job.”
Faulty product
2 reports · 100% of complaints“It took 9 months for this company to install my garden room with weekly broken delivery promises.”
1 reader marked this review helpful on Trustpilot.
“They delivered late, poor workmanship didn’t finish the job.”
The company claimed its Trustpilot profile on 2026-03-12. We last checked this profile on 2026-11-11 and found 0 new reviews. These are facts Trustpilot publishes about the profile, as of our last harvest.
Forum footprint: 0 MoneySavingExpert forum discussions mention this company (browse). Roughly 0 of the top, relevance-sorted search results were posted in the last 90 days — an approximate figure by construction, not a true recency count.
What their policy promises
refund window: first two years
“100% refund of all rent paid during the first two years of occupation towards the deposit to purchase.”
refund window: up to 15 years
“Will be able to borrow up to 10% of the purchase price unsecured for up to 15 years at 0% interest.”
refund window: up to 10%
“We will match a purchaser’s deposit up to 10% of the purchase price.”
refund window: up to 50%
“Up to 50% lifetime mortgage available with no monthly payments required at all.”
Quoted verbatim from the company’s own published policy (source page); complaint counts are census classifications. As of 2026-10-30.
Policy-page monitoring
We monitor this company’s published policy page. No change to the policy text has been detected since we started watching on 2026-10-19.
Automated change detection on the company’s own published policy page. A change is listed only when a term, price, time limit, right or contact route in the policy text changed; other edits are counted, not listed.
Sector benchmark: delivery late makes up 100% of this company’s complaints vs a 22% median across 103 ranked companies in its sector.
Review velocity: 0 of this company’s 2 Trustpilot reviews (0%) were written in the last 12 months.
Other UK companies with evidenced “Delivery late” complaints
- Luv Cars
- Luxeemporiumx
- Maia Gifts
- Malford of London
- Manchester City
- Manor FX
- Marks Electrical
- Mastershoe
- Mobile Reborn
- Mr Memory
See all companies by issue: Delivery late · Faulty product · Sector table: Other sectors in the UK
Compare Lowcarbonconstruction with…
Method: reviews are classified into a fixed complaint taxonomy by an automated reader; every category shown is backed by at least two verbatim quotes from distinct reviews. Trends are computed from dated review counts only. Negative reviews are deliberately over-sampled for evidence depth; headline percentages use an unbiased recent sample only. Report updated 2026-09-30.