ComplaintCensus

ASA upheld rulings

1,232 upheld rulings from the Advertising Standards Authority, reproduced with attribution. The ASA is the UK’s independent advertising self-regulator, not a government body. “Upheld” means the ASA upheld a complaint about a specific advert — it is not a finding about the advertiser’s business as a whole. Where a ruling names a company we could verify on Trustpilot, we link through to its page below (44 of 1232); most named advertisers are not companies we track, so the absence of a link is not a matching failure.

2026 (193 rulings)
AdvertiserDateMediumIssueRulingCompany page
Tilray Brands UK Ltd t/a BrewDog2026-09-16Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook posts for BrewDog were socially irresponsible and encouraged the excessive consumption of alcohol. The ads also portrayed alcohol as capable of changing mood.asa.org.uk—
Dribble Media Ltd t/a Midnite2026-09-16Social media (paid ad)A paid-for TikTok ad for Midnite featured someone who was or seemed to be under 25 gambling and playing a significant role in the ad.asa.org.uk—
Animcha Ltd t/a tyan.ai2026-09-16Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for an AI companion generator app was socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence, including by featuring a harmful gender stereotype that objectified and sexualasa.org.uk—
Guangxi Baise Tianyi Agricultural Development Co Ltd t/a Nexaipic - AI Portrait Generation Tool2026-09-16Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Meta ads for an AI portrait generation tool were socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence, including by featuring a harmful gender stereotype that objectified and sasa.org.uk—
McCain Foods (GB) Ltd t/a McCain Foodservice Solutions2026-09-16Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for McCain Foods and Five Akhi’s restaurants broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.asa.org.uk—
Persons unknown t/a KH31 DD222026-09-16Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for an AI image-to-video generator app was socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence, including by featuring a harmful gender stereotype that objectified and sasa.org.uk—
Rusto AI-AI Photo Toolbox t/a Rusto AI2026-09-16Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for an AI image generator tool was socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence, including by featuring a harmful gender stereotype that objectified and sexualiseasa.org.uk—
Sinosea Technology PTE Ltd t/a PictoPop2026-09-16Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for an AI image-to-video generation app was socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence, including by featuring a harmful gender stereotype that objectified and asa.org.uk—
Hemios2026-09-09Social media (paid ad), Internet (display)A paid-for Facebook ad and a paid-for YouTube display ad for a magnetic bracelet made misleading claims in relation to weight-loss and improving erectile performance.asa.org.uk—
We Love Holidays Ltd t/a loveholidays2026-09-09Search (paid)Two paid-for Google ads for loveholidays didn’t make the basis for their environmental claims clear.asa.org.ukview
Lotus Leisure Ltd t/a DialAFlight2026-09-09Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for a travel agent didn’t make the basis for their environmental claims clear.asa.org.uk—
OneStream Ltd2026-09-09Website (own site)A website for OneStream didn’t make clear that their broadband packages included free trials that automatically renewed for a fee.asa.org.uk—
Smart Gravity Ltd t/a top10onlinecasinoreviews.co.uk2026-09-09Search (paid)A paid-for search ad for a gambling comparison website was not targeted responsibly.asa.org.uk—
Thomas Cook Tourism (UK) Company Ltd t/a Thomas Cook2026-09-09Search (paid)A paid- for Google ad for Thomas Cook didn’t make the basis for their environmental claims clear.asa.org.uk—
ATR Brands Ltd t/a Antler2026-09-02—Two emails and a website page for a luggage retailer misleadingly implied a promotion included all products they sold, by stating a promotion related to “everything” or applied “sitewide” when this waasa.org.uk—
Frasers Group Trading Ltd t/a Sports Direct2026-09-02Website (own site)A product page on the Sports Direct website made misleading claims about reference price and associated savings.asa.org.uk—
Glow Up LLC t/a Maxxing2026-09-02Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Meta ads for an AI powered app to maximise physical attractiveness misleadingly exaggerated the effectiveness of the product, were irresponsible and included gender stereotypes that were asa.org.uk—
Kind Patches Ltd2026-09-02Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad for a supplement company, misleadingly implied their products had health benefits without supporting evidence and irresponsibly trivialised and condoned an act of anti-social basa.org.uk—
SheMed Ltd2026-09-02Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Reddit ad for a female-focused medical weight-loss service promoted weight-loss prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules, was likely to exploit consumers’ inasa.org.uk—
Stacey’s World Rocks2026-08-26Messaging appA Telegram post on the Stacey’s World Rocks account was socially irresponsible by encouraging people not to pay household bills.asa.org.uk—
BioIdentical Hormone Therapy Ltd t/a BioID Health2026-08-26Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads for a hormone health consultant made misleading claims that they could provide more effective tests and services for low testosterone than GPs and were irresponsible by implyasa.org.uk—
Hotpoint UK Appliances Ltd2026-08-26Website (own site)A website for Hotpoint made misleading comparative claims.asa.org.uk—
Nutri-Paw Ltd t/a Healthy Dog2026-08-26Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a dog dental care product misleadingly and irresponsibly implied that dogs undergoing veterinary treatment had a high chance of dying, made medicinal claims for an unauthoriasa.org.uk—
Vir Health Ltd t/a Numan2026-08-26Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads for a digital healthcare company made misleading claims about the occurrence of low testosterone in the male population.asa.org.uk—
Fenix Biomed BV2026-08-19Website (own site)A website for a human tissue donation service misleadingly implied they were based in the UK.asa.org.uk—
The Boots Company PLC t/a Boots2026-08-19National newspaper (paid ad)A national press ad for Boots featured a promotion that wasn’t administered fairly and caused participants unnecessary disappointment.asa.org.uk—
Dribble Media Ltd t/a Midnite2026-08-12Television, VOD, RadioTwo TV ads, Two Video on Demand ads and a radio ad for Midnite, a betting app, portrayed gambling behaviour that could lead to financial, social or emotional harm and also suggested that gambling was asa.org.uk—
EverAI Ltd t/a AI Realities2026-08-12Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for an AI companion app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence by including a harmful gender stereotype which objectified women.asa.org.uk—
Gary Baron2026-08-12Website (own site)A webpage for Gary Baron Counselling claimed that he was a member of the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP) when this wasn’t the case.asa.org.uk—
Nectar Sleep Ltd2026-08-12Website (own site)The homepage for the Nectar Sleep website made misleading saving claims and didn’t make the basis of their savings claims clear. They also made comparisons against other brands’ prices without ensurinasa.org.uk—
YO! Sushi UK Ltd t/a YO!2026-08-12Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram post for YO! Sushi broke the rules by featuring an identifiable specific less healthy food product.asa.org.uk—
Jaded London Ltd2026-08-05EmailAn email for a clothing brand was socially irresponsible by glamourising smoking.asa.org.uk—
Innate-Essence Ltd t/a the Turmeric Co.2026-08-05Website (own site)A website for a turmeric shot company made claims that a food could prevent, treat or cure human disease.asa.org.uk—
Airbrush2026-07-29—Two paid-for Facebook ads and a website for a hairstyling company misleadingly implied they were endorsed by fashion brands, used unrelated influencer content to promote their product and didn’t have asa.org.uk—
Bolt Healthcare Ltd t/a Bolt Pharmacy2026-07-29—Two paid-for Facebook ads for an online pharmacy failed to make their commercial intent clear and falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their trade by presenting websites used for adveasa.org.uk—
Bolt Healthcare Ltd t/a Bolt Pharmacy2026-07-29—Two paid-for Facebook ads for an online pharmacy promoted weight loss prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
BoyleSports (Gibraltar) Ltd t/a BoyleSports2026-07-29—A paid-for online display ad for a gambling company encouraged gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible and could lead to financial harm by encouraging frequent and repetitive participation.asa.org.uk—
Higham Miller Coffee Ltd t/a Exhale Healthy Coffee2026-07-22Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad for a coffee company made unauthorised health and nutrition claims and included health claims that referred to the recommendation of an individual health professional.asa.org.uk—
Dignity Funerals Ltd t/a Simplicity Cremations2026-07-22TelevisionTwo TV ads for a funeral provider didn’t make clear that the funeral plans advertised were for non-attended cremations only.asa.org.ukview
Domino's Pizza UK & Ireland Ltd t/a Domino's2026-07-22Social media (paid ad), Television, Video on demandA TV ad, Video on Demand ad and a YouTube ad for Domino’s broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.asa.org.uk—
Qatar Airways Group QCSC t/a Qatar Airways2026-07-15Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for LinkedIn posts for an airline gave a misleading impression of their flights environmental impact and implied that people could pay to fully offset the carbon emissions of a specific flighasa.org.uk—
Eurowings GmbH t/a Eurowings2026-07-15Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad for an airline gave a misleading impression of their flights environmental impact and implied that people could pay to fully offset the carbon emissions from a specific flight witasa.org.uk—
Kind Patches Ltd2026-07-15Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a supplement company made claims that a supplement patch could help with weight-loss and made medicinal claims for products that weren’t authorised by the Medicines and Healasa.org.uk—
Parker Products Ltd t/a ParkerBrand2026-07-15Website (own site)A website ad for a pressure washer made misleading savings claims and stated savings against previous prices without evidence that the product was normally sold at that price.asa.org.uk—
Phlo Technologies Ltd2026-07-15Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad promoted weight-loss prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
Stove Industry Alliance Ltd t/a Stove Industry Association (SIA)2026-07-08Website (own site)[Republished ruling] A website for the Stove Industry Association made unsubstantiated claims that modern stoves emitted significantly lower emissions than open fireplaces or older stoves, and that thasa.org.uk—
Capgroup Inc Ltd2026-07-08Website (own site)A website for a whiskey cask and gold coin investment company made misleading claims about investment returns. As well as misleadingly presenting an incorrect Trustpilot score. The ad also failed to masa.org.uk—
Grain Connect Ltd2026-07-08EmailAn email from a broadband company made misleading price rise claims about an identifiable competitor.asa.org.uk—
Mars Wrigley Confectionery UK Ltd t/a Mars2026-07-08Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad for M&M’s broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product through the inclusion of a character that depicted a specific less healthy food product.asa.org.uk—
S&E1 Ltd t/a Morley's Woking2026-07-08Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad for Morley’s broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.asa.org.uk—
Singapore New Reading Technology Pte Ltd t/a GoodNovel2026-07-01App (paid ad)An in-game ad for an online reading platform was socially irresponsible, condoned violence, included harmful gender stereotypes and was likely to cause harm or serious and widespread offence.asa.org.uk—
Videoslots Ltd t/a Mr Vegas2026-07-01Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a gambling company featured imagery that was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.asa.org.uk—
Cablelinker Electronics Ltd t/a Aquoxis2026-07-01Social media (paid ad)A YouTube pre-roll ad and two online display ads for a pressure washer misleadingly exaggerated the functionality of the product.asa.org.uk—
YN Netcom Ltd t/a BeeHome2026-07-01Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a cordless pressure washer misleadingly exaggerated the functionality of the product and claimed they had a high rating based on customer reviews when this was not the case.asa.org.uk—
Microsoft Ltd t/a Microsoft2026-06-24Poster (digital static image)Two digital posters for the Xbox Game Pass failed to make clear that the games shown in the posters included in game purchases.asa.org.uk—
Adidas UK Ltd t/a adidas2026-06-24Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad for adidas made misleading environmental claims.asa.org.uk—
Big Fang Collective Ltd t/a Golf Fang2026-06-24Leaflet, brochure, catalogue or directoryA leaflet for an indoor golf venue didn’t make clear it was an ad and caused unjustified distress by resembling a parking ticket.asa.org.uk—
Calvin Klein Europe BV t/a Calvin Klein2026-06-24Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad for Calvin Klein made misleading environmental claims.asa.org.uk—
Express Healthcare Ltd t/a pharmacyonline.co.uk2026-06-24Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad and website for an online pharmacy promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
Motorpoint Ltd2026-06-24Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad for a used car retailer made misleading savings claims.asa.org.uk—
Parc AI Ltd t/a Parc2026-06-24Leaflet, brochure, catalogue or directoryA leaflet for a car parking app didn’t make clear it was an ad and caused unjustified distress by resembling a parking ticket.asa.org.uk—
The Clean Supps LLC t/a Inno Supps2026-06-24Social media (paid ad)Four paid-for Meta ads promoting supplements made claims that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure human diseases or conditions, made unauthorised health claims and made claims that referredasa.org.uk—
Uniqlo (UK) Ltd t/a UNIQLO2026-06-24Search (paid)A paid- for Google ad for UNIQLO made misleading environmental claims.asa.org.uk—
Wrappiness UK2026-06-24Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for an online décor and gift retailer was likely to cause serious and widespread offence including by using explicit language and sexual references.asa.org.uk—
Novabeyond Ltd t/a Blood Pressure-Monitor Tracker App2026-06-17Search (paid)An in-app ad and a paid-for Google ad for a health app made medical claims for a product that wasn’t registered as a medical device and made misleading claims that their product could monitor blood prasa.org.uk—
This is Enough Ltd2026-06-17Social media (own site)[Republished ruling] A website, LinkedIn post and GoFundMe page promoting DNA testing kits for victims of sexual assault made misleading claims about the incidence of rapes and the potential for evideasa.org.uk—
StudySmarter GmbH2026-06-17Website (own site)Three job listings on a student resource website misleadingly implied they were genuine job vacancies and falsely implied that the advertiser was acting for purposes outside its business.asa.org.uk—
Pure Cremation Funeral Planning Ltd t/a Pure Cremation2026-06-17TelevisionA TV ad for Pure Cremation misleadingly implied that their standard funeral plan included an attended funeral service and failed to make clear where a plan was limited to a non-attended cremation.asa.org.uk—
P&L Studio t/a Blood Pressure2026-06-17App (paid ad)A paid-for in-app ad for a health app misleadingly implied that it could monitor blood pressure and heart rate.asa.org.uk—
BetterYou Ltd t/a Better You2026-06-17Magazine (paid ad)A magazine ad for a supplement company made misleading claims that their product delivered vitamin D “quickly” and enabled fast absorption of vitamin D into the body.asa.org.uk—
HealthTracker Apps t/a Blood Pressure Monitor App2026-06-17App (paid ad)Two paid-for in-app ads for a health app made medical claims for a product that wasn’t registered as a medical device and misleadingly implied that their app could monitor blood pressure and heart ratasa.org.uk—
Hume Health LLC t/a HumeHealth2026-06-17Social media (paid ad)Three paid-for YouTube ads and a paid-for Facebook ad for Hume Health made medical claims for products that weren’t registered as medical devices, discouraged essential treatment for conditions for whasa.org.uk—
MN2S Management Ltd t/a MN2S2026-06-17Website (own site)A website for a talent agency misleadingly stated that Seph Lawless was represented by the agency and was available to be booked through them.asa.org.uk—
Tarvos Ltd t/a 78792026-06-10Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for an online retailer of gold and platinum jewellery failed to make clear that physical gold and precious metal investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was varasa.org.uk—
Rosland Capital Ltd2026-06-10Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a gold and precious metal specialist failed to make clear that gold and precious metal investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.asa.org.uk—
RE/MAX Property Specialists t/a Billie Dunlop2026-06-10Social media (own site)A leaflet and a Facebook post for an estate agency service made misleading and unverifiable comparisons with identifiable competitors.asa.org.uk—
Montford Group Ltd t/a Brittania Bullion2026-06-10Social media (paid ad)A paid-for LinkedIn ad for a gold investment company failed to make clear that physical gold investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.asa.org.uk—
Fortore Ltd2026-06-10Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for an investment competition website failed to make clear that gold and precious metal investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.asa.org.uk—
Beauty Pie Ltd t/a Beauty Pie Ltd2026-06-10PosterA poster for an LED face mask made misleading claims that it was clinically proven to reduce wrinkles in 4 weeks.asa.org.uk—
Amazon Europe Core Sarl t/a Amazon.co.uk2026-06-10Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad for Amazon Fresh UK broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.asa.org.uk—
Sourced Consultancy Ltd t/a Oak & Mason2026-06-10Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for a gold investment company failed to make clear that physical gold investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable. The ad also broke the rules by referasa.org.uk—
Brighton & Hove City Council2026-06-03Poster (digital static image)A digital poster misleadingly implied there was a direct causal link between the use of wood burners and open fires and an increase in particle pollution, without having suitable evidence to back thisasa.org.uk—
Wowcher Ltd t/a Wowcher2026-06-03Website (commercial classified)A promotion on the Wowcher website wasn’t administered fairly and caused unnecessary disappointment.asa.org.ukview
DUSK (Retail) Ltd t/a DUSK2026-06-03Website (own site)Four webpages for an online bed retailer made misleading savings claims.asa.org.uk—
Menwell Ltd t/a Voy2026-05-27EmailThree emails for an online pharmacy promoted prescription-only medicines to the public against the law and our rules. The ads were also socially irresponsible by creating an undue sense of urgency forasa.org.uk—
linyixiansanrenwangluokejiyouxiangongsi t/a IDJRDDF2026-05-27Website (commercial classified)A product listing on Amazon featured a gender stereotype that was likely to cause harm or serious offence.asa.org.uk—
Guangzhoushi Yingyi Maoyi Youxiangongsi t/a LANPN2026-05-27Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram post on Gemma Markland’s account wasn’t obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
Cyan Blue Odds Ltd t/a Oddschecker2026-05-27Social media (own site)Two Instagram posts for an online betting platform featuring Harry Kane and Erling Haaland were likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.asa.org.uk—
Perrin Et Fils SAS t/a La Vieille Ferme2026-05-20Social media (paid ad)A paid-for TikTok ad for a wine company irresponsibly implied that alcohol had therapeutic qualities, portrayed alcohol as being capable of changing your mood and a source of nourishment and made healasa.org.uk—
DBZ Marketplace Online Ltd t/a Debenhams2026-05-20Website (own site)Two video display banners for Debenhams made misleading savings claims.asa.org.uk—
Shop Direct Home Shopping Ltd t/a Very2026-05-20Website (own site)Two website pages for Very made misleading savings claims.asa.org.uk—
SnackVerse Ltd2026-05-20Website (own site)A webpage for a snack subscription box misleadingly implied their subscribers would receive a specific country-themed box but didn’t make clear this was subject to allocation conditions.asa.org.uk—
VAM Apps Co t/a The Coach2026-05-20Social media (paid ad)A paid-for YouTube ad for a men’s health app was likely to cause serious and widespread offence.asa.org.uk—
John Lewis plc2026-05-20Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad and an online display ad for John Lewis made misleading savings claims.asa.org.ukview
111 Skin Ltd t/a 111skin2026-05-13Website (own site)A product listing for a skincare product misleadingly exaggerated the effects of a cosmetic product for ageing skin.asa.org.uk—
Linjer Ltd2026-05-13Search (paid)Two paid-for Google ads for a jewellery retailer didn’t make clear that their diamonds were synthetic.asa.org.uk—
Course Accreditation Ltd2026-05-13Website (own site)A website and a paid-for Google search ad for an accreditation company didn’t provide suitable evidence to back up objective claims, including comparative claims. The ads also misleadingly implied theasa.org.uk—
Novita Diamonds Ltd t/a Novita Diamonds2026-05-13Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Meta ads for a jewellery retailer didn’t make clear that their diamonds were synthetic.asa.org.uk—
Medilife Clinic Enfield2026-05-06Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad for a health clinic made claims that their treatments could alleviate or treat the traits of autism without suitable evidence to support these claims. The ad also discouraged easa.org.uk—
Bestway Retail Ltd t/a Bargain Booze2026-05-06Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for an alcohol retailer irresponsibly implied that alcohol could overcome loneliness.asa.org.uk—
Beiersdorf UK Ltd2026-04-29PosterA poster ad for Eucerin Skincare misleadingly claimed that a serum was clinically proven to make you look up to 5 years younger.asa.org.uk—
Bakkavor Ltd2026-04-29Packaging (promotion)A promotion featured on the packaging of a cookie dough dessert misleadingly implied that particular products were included in the promotion, causing unnecessary disappointment.asa.org.uk—
iRevolution Claims Ltd2026-04-29Search (paid), Website (own site)Three Google search listings and a website for an accident claims management company failed to make the nature of their service clear and misleadingly implied there was no cost to consumers.asa.org.uk—
Gismart Ltd t/a Dancebit2026-04-29Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a dance workout app misleadingly stated that their service was free.asa.org.uk—
Exclusive Law Ltd2026-04-29Search (paid), Website (own site)Three paid-for Google search listings and a website for an accident claims management company failed to make the nature of their service clear, misleadingly implied there was no cost to consumers and asa.org.uk—
CC Response NW Ltd2026-04-29Search (paid), Website (own site)Two paid-for Google search listings and a web landing page for an accident claims management company failed to make the nature of their service clear, misleadingly implied there was no cost to consumeasa.org.uk—
Sinointeractive Digital Marketing Co Ltd t/a trustedbuyerguide.org2026-04-22Search (paid)A paid-for search ad for a vacuum review website failed to make their commercial intent clear and falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their trade by presenting websites used for markasa.org.uk—
Easy as HGV Ltd2026-04-22Website (own site)Three websites for Heavy Goods Vehicle (HGV) training service providers made misleading claims about HGV test pass rates and falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their business.asa.org.uk—
Dollead Technology Ltd2026-04-22Search (paid)A paid-for search ad for a vacuum review website failed to make their commercial intent clear and falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their trade by presenting websites used for markasa.org.uk—
Global Health Tests Ltd t/a Check My Body Health2026-04-22Website (own site)A website for a Bioresonance hair test misleadingly claimed that the test could comprehensively analyse body intolerances.asa.org.uk—
Ecoflow Innovation UK2026-04-22Website (own site)A website for a sustainable energy company misleadingly claimed that their products could be installed without using a certified installer or electrician.asa.org.uk—
Birling Shore Ltd t/a ShroomIQ2026-04-22Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)A website and paid-for Facebook ad for a children’s supplement brand stated that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure the symptoms of ADHD, Tourette Syndrome, anxiety and depression. The adsasa.org.uk—
Xinyu International Trading Ltd t/a consumertestreports.org2026-04-22Search (paid)A paid-for search ad for a vacuum review website failed to make their commercial intent clear and falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their trade by presenting websites used for markasa.org.uk—
Shop TJC Ltd t/a Ideal World2026-04-22TelevisionTwo teleshopping presentations advertising watches made misleading claims about price, savings and availability.asa.org.uk—
HGV Learning2026-04-22Website (own site)A website for a Heavy Goods Vehicle (HGV) training service provider made misleading claims about HGV test pass rates.asa.org.uk—
Pets Corner UK Ltd t/a Pet Food Expert2026-04-22Website (own site)A homepage for a website providing information about pet food falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their trade by misleadingly presenting the website as independent.asa.org.uk—
L'Oréal (UK) Ltd2026-04-22Video on demandA Video-On-Demand ad for a serum made misleading claims that it was clinically proven to reduce hyperpigmentation in two weeks.asa.org.uk—
HGVT Ltd2026-04-22Website (own site)A website and pages for Heavy Goods Vehicle (HGV) training service providers made misleading claims about HGV test pass rates, the nature of a promotion and being the largest and best rated HGV trainiasa.org.uk—
Untamed Cat Food Ltd2026-04-15Social media (own site)An Instagram post on Untamed Cat Food’s account misleadingly made comparative claims with identifiable competitors and made misleading claims relating to the meat content of a cat’s diet and their proasa.org.uk—
Lidl Northern Ireland Ltd2026-04-15Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram post for Lidl by influencer Emma Kearney broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.asa.org.uk—
Iceland Foods Ltd t/a Iceland and The Food Warehouse2026-04-15Website (paid ad), Internet (display)A banner ad and a display ad for Iceland Foods broke the rules by featuring identifiable less healthy food products.asa.org.uk—
Juniper Technologies UK Ltd t/a Juniper2026-04-08Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Instagram ads for an online pharmacy promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, which is against the law and our rules. They also created an undue sense of urgency for members ofasa.org.uk—
Juniper Technologies UK Ltd t/a Juniper2026-04-08Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Posts in weight-loss support groups on Facebook didn't make clear they were paid for by the advertiser and they promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, which is against the law and our rulasa.org.uk—
Skill on Net Ltd t/a Gecko Play2026-04-08Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad for a gambling website portrayed, condoned and encouraged gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible and could lead to financial, social or emotional harm.asa.org.uk—
Juniper Technologies UK Ltd t/a Juniper2026-04-08Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)A paid-for Facebook ad for an online pharmacy was socially irresponsible and likely to cause harm or serious and widespread offence by exploiting new mothers’ insecurities about body image and perpetuasa.org.uk—
Persons unknown t/a Cloud Nine2026-04-01Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a clothing company made medical claims for a product that didn’t have the relevant compliance labels and wasn’t registered with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatasa.org.uk—
Sazerac UK Ltd t/a Hi-Spirits2026-04-01PosterA poster for an alcoholic drink was socially irresponsible by encouraging excessive drinking.asa.org.uk—
Mark Anthony Brands (UK) Ltd t/a White Claw UK2026-03-25Social media (own site)An Instagram Highlight on White Claw UK’s page, an alcohol brand, featured three Stories showing individuals who appeared to be under 25, breaching the alcohol advertising rules.asa.org.uk—
222 Collective Group Ltd t/a 222collectiveuk2026-03-25Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)A paid-for Facebook and Instagram ad for a food supplement brand made claims that their supplements could prevent, treat or cure the symptoms of the menopause and Pre-Menstrual Syndrome (PMS).asa.org.uk—
DrinkWell Beverages Ltd t/a Drinkwell2026-03-25Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for an online alcohol retailer misleadingly implied a drink may be preferred due to its alcohol content and made non-permitted health and nutrition claims about alcoholic drinks.asa.org.uk—
Gallaher Ltd t/a JTI UK2026-03-25App (paid ad)A paid-for in-app ad promoting awareness of illegal tobacco misleadingly claimed that half of shops in the given area sold illegal tobacco, without having adequate evidence to back up this claim.asa.org.uk—
Kaocommerce Ltd t/a Lunera2026-03-25Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Meta ads for a food supplement brand made claims that their supplements could prevent, treat or cure symptoms of the menopause and inflammation. The ad also made unauthorised health claimasa.org.uk—
Minerva Wellness Ltd2026-03-25Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)A paid-for Facebook ad and website for a supplement brand misleadingly implied their food supplements could prevent, treat or cure symptoms of the menopause. The ad also made unauthorised specific heaasa.org.uk—
Nova Relief t/a Nova Menopause Vitality2026-03-25Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads for a food supplement company misleadingly implied their food supplements could prevent, treat or cure symptoms of the menopause. The ad also made unauthorised specific healtasa.org.uk—
UAB CommerceCore t/a WiggyDog2026-03-25Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for a robot-dog toy misleadingly represented and exaggerated the functionality and appearance of the product through claims and images that it behaved and looked like a real dog.asa.org.uk—
Persons unknown t/a Charmfay Shop2026-03-25Social media (paid ad)A paid-for YouTube ad for a clothing company made misleading claims regarding a product including images and the materials used to make them.asa.org.uk—
Polybiotics Ltd t/a Polybiotics2026-03-25Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)A paid-for Facebook and Instagram ad and a website for a food supplement brand misleading implied their food supplements could prevent, cure or treat Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS). The ad also maasa.org.uk—
Riverside Credit Union Ltd2026-03-18Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook post for a credit union irresponsibly encouraged excessive spending through the use of credit, particularly in relation to funding non-essential Christmas purchases.asa.org.uk—
Saeta Tech Ltd t/a PixVideo – AI Video Maker2026-03-18Social media (paid ad)A paid-for YouTube ad for an AI video maker which condoned digitally altering and exposing women’s bodies without their consent, was irresponsible, included a harmful gender stereotype and was likely asa.org.uk—
Smart Money Cymru Community Bank2026-03-18Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook post for a credit union irresponsibly encouraged excessive spending through the use of credit, particularly in relation to Christmas.asa.org.uk—
TFS Buying Ltd2026-03-18Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a buy now pay later arrangement irresponsibly encouraged non-essential spending through the use of credit, particularly in relation to funding non-essential Christmas purchaasa.org.uk—
Centre of CPD Excellence2026-03-18Website (own site)A website for an accreditation company made misleading claims it had panels of specialists, independent industry experts, accreditation against internationally recognised standards and official relatiasa.org.uk—
Digital Vapers2026-03-18LeafletA leaflet for a vape retailer featuring colourful cartoon-style fruit characters broke the rules by being likely to appeal particularly to people under 18 years of age.asa.org.uk—
Eastern Savings and Loans Credit Union2026-03-18Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a credit union irresponsibly encouraged the purchase of non-essential items through the use of credit, particularly in relation to funding Black Friday and Christmas purchasasa.org.uk—
Grind Coffee Roasters Ltd t/a Grind2026-03-18Website (own site)An ad on Grind’s own website for its coffee pods failed to make the basis of a price comparison clear and misrepresented their competitor product’s end-of-life arrangements.asa.org.uk—
Humantra UK Operations Ltd t/a Humantra2026-03-18Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for electrolyte sachets broke rules prohibit claims that state or imply a food can prevent, treat or cure human disease.asa.org.uk—
ZOE Ltd2026-03-11Social media (paid ad)[Republished ruling] A paid-for Facebook ad misleadingly claimed that a supplement didn’t contain any ultra-processed ingredients.asa.org.uk—
Wild Nutrition Ltd2026-03-04PosterA poster for a supplement company misleadingly claimed their ingredients came from food or natural sources.asa.org.uk—
Centrica Hive Ltd t/a Hive2026-03-04National newspaper (paid ad)A national press ad for Hive promoting solar panels didn’t have enough evidence to demonstrate that ‘up to’ saving claims could be achieved by a significant proportion of people and also failed to incasa.org.ukview
British Gas Services Ltd t/a British Gas2026-03-04Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for British Gas, which promoted switching to a heat pump, didn’t have enough evidence to demonstrate that ‘up to’ saving claims could be achieved by a significant proportion of peopasa.org.ukview
persons unknown t/a Evora Official2026-02-25Social media (paid ad)Four paid-for Facebook ads and a website for a multi-sensory stuffed toy made unlicenced medicinal claims that weren’t backed up by robust evidence, including that the product could relieve symptoms oasa.org.uk—
Alliance Winds Ltd t/a linendaily2026-02-25Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad and a website listing for an online clothing company misleadingly claimed they were established and owned by armed forces veterans and that they donated a share of profits to PTSD sasa.org.uk—
WashWater UK Ltd2026-02-25BrochureA brochure for a water conditioning and purifying system manufacturer misleadingly implied their water treatment systems could target and remove existing limescale, reduce hot water bills and help impasa.org.uk—
Practice Pal t/a Involve Education (Involve)2026-02-25Website (own site)A website for a management information services software provider for schools made misleading and unverifiable comparative claims about competitors’ products.asa.org.uk—
Whaleco UK Ltd t/a Temu2026-02-18Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads for Temu were misleading by contradicting the terms and conditions that applied to an advertised promotion.asa.org.uk—
Surge International Ltd2026-02-18Website (commercial classified)A listing seen on the job website Indeed.com made misleading claims about the starting salary of a role and failed to make clear that the role was self-employed.asa.org.uk—
FlyDogGame t/a Love and Peace2026-02-18App (paid ad)A paid-for ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by trivialising and condoning violence, including domestic violence.asa.org.uk—
Health Bridge Ltd t/a Zava2026-02-18Website (ad feature)An advertorial promoting medicated weight-loss seen on the Mumsnet website didn’t make it clear it was an ad, used healthcare professionals to endorse a medicine and promoted prescription-only medicinasa.org.uk—
Pocket FM Private Ltd2026-02-18App (paid ad)A paid-for in-app ad for an audiobook app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by referencing sexual assault and sexual violence.asa.org.uk—
Skywork AI Pte t/a Dramawave2026-02-18App (paid ad)A video ad for a streaming platform was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by featuring content that was sexually explicit and suggested sexual violencasa.org.uk—
Transport For London t/a TFL2026-02-18Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for Transport for London was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence on the grounds of race by reinforcing a negative stereotype about black men.asa.org.uk—
Haikou Chengfa Technology Co Ltd t/a Aurai Ai2026-02-11Social media (paid ad)A paid-for YouTube ad for an AI role play app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence, including by featuring expletives and content that condoned sexually violenasa.org.uk—
MedExpress Enterprises Ltd t/a MedExpress2026-02-11Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Three Instagram posts and a TikTok video for weight-loss injections promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
Menwell Ltd t/a Voy2026-02-11Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Four Instagram ads for weight-loss injections promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
ZING Oral Care Ltd t/a ZING Toothpaste2026-02-11Social media (own site)Three paid-for Facebook ads for ZING Toothpaste misleadingly implied they had a five-star Trustpilot rating but didn't have the evidence to back this claim up.asa.org.uk—
On The Beach Ltd2026-02-11EmailAn email for On The Beach made misleading price comparison claims and failed to make clear if people needed to act quickly to benefit from an advertised lower price. The ad also failed to make the basasa.org.ukview
The Walt Disney Company Ltd t/a Twentieth Century Studios2026-02-11Poster (digital video)An outdoor digital video poster for the film Predator Badlands was likely to cause fear and distress for young children and was displayed in a place where it could be seen by people of all ages.asa.org.uk—
UK Meds Direct Ltd2026-02-11Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Two TikTok ads for weight-loss injections promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
Golden Vape UK Ltd2026-02-11Website (own site)Seven product listings on eBay promoted unlicenced nicotine containing e-cigarettes and their components in media where these products cannot be advertised.asa.org.uk—
Health Bridge Ltd t/a Zava2026-02-11Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram post, TikTok video and a Facebook post for weight-loss injections promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
Kit & Kin Ltd2026-02-04—A website for a baby product company failed to make the basis of environmental and comparative claims clear, didn’t have suitable evidence to support these claims and gave a misleading impression of tasa.org.uk—
Kind Patches Ltd2026-02-04Social media (paid ad)Four paid-for Facebook ads for a supplement company misleadingly implied their products had health benefits without having suitable evidence to back these claims up.asa.org.uk—
persons unknown t/a Animals Solitaire: Protect2026-02-04In-game (apps)An in-game ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by objectifying and sexualising women and featuring a harmful gender stereotasa.org.uk—
The Cheeky Panda Ltd2026-02-04Website (own site)A website for a baby product company failed to make the basis of environmental and comparative claims clear and didn’t have suitable evidence to support the claims made.asa.org.uk—
GJF Baron Nobilis Services Co. Ltd t/a Noble Titles2026-01-28Website (own site)A webpage for a title purchasing website misleadingly implied that the public could purchase a legal or officially recognised title through their service.asa.org.uk—
CB Payments Ltd t/a Coinbase2026-01-28Poster, Video on demandA video on demand ad and three posters for Coinbase, a cryptocurrency trading platform, irresponsibly trivialised the risks of cryptocurrency investment and implied it was a solution to financial concasa.org.uk—
TUI UK Ltd2026-01-28Website (own site)A holiday listing featured on the TUI website misleadingly advertised prices that weren’t available to the public.asa.org.ukview
Dreame International Hong Kong Ltd t/a Stary PTE Ltd2026-01-28App (own claim)Two in-app ads for a romantic fiction app were socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence including by trivialising or condoning violence against women and girls and feaasa.org.uk—
Mamedica Ltd2026-01-28Website (own site)A website for a medical cannabis clinic made misleading price comparison claims, failed to make the basis of comparisons with competitors clear and didn’t ensure that people would be able to verify coasa.org.uk—
Manchester Fertility Services Ltd t/a Egg Donors UK2026-01-28Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads for Egg Donors UK trivialised the decision to donate eggs by emphasising the financial compensation.asa.org.uk—
Whitworths Ltd2026-01-28Social media (own site)An Instagram carousel post for WhitworthsUK misleadingly implied that a product counted toward the Government’s recommended “five a day” portions of fruit and vegetables and made unauthorised comparatasa.org.uk—
easyJet Airline Co Ltd2026-01-28Website (own site)A webpage for easyJet used “from” price claims which misleadingly implied that large cabin bags were available at the advertised price across a significant proportion of their flights.asa.org.uk—
Tanbox Towcester Ltd2026-01-21Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a tanning studio misleadingly and irresponsibly claimed that sunbed use offered health benefits and that the use of sunbeds was healthy. The ad also discouraged essential trasa.org.uk—
The Sun Company (Horsham) Ltd t/a The Sun Company2026-01-21Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad for a tanning studio was socially irresponsible and misleading by suggesting that tanning could be obtained safely.asa.org.uk—
JD Tanning UK Ltd2026-01-21Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Meta ads for a sunbed hire company misleadingly and irresponsibly claimed that sunbed use offered health benefits and that the use of sunbeds was safe. The ads also discouraged essential asa.org.uk—
Whiskey & Wealth Club Ltd2026-01-21Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)A paid-for Facebook ad, landing page and website for a whiskey cask investment company made misleading claims about investment returns. The ad also failed to make clear that cask whiskey investments wasa.org.uk—
Byrokko2026-01-21Social media (paid ad)A paid for Facebook ad for a tanning accelerator misleadingly and irresponsibly implied that the use of sunbeds was safe, and that using their product during sunbed use could help people achieve a tanasa.org.uk—
SFJ Group Ltd t/a SunShine Co2026-01-21Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Google search ad for a tanning studio was socially irresponsible and misleading by suggesting that tanning could be obtained safely.asa.org.uk—
Freedom Debt Ltd2026-01-07Search (paid)Two paid-for Google search listings and two websites for an accident claims management company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business by implying they were a car insasa.org.uk—
Vodafone Ltd2026-01-07Poster, Social media (paid ad), TelevisionSix ads for Vodafone were misleading by making an implied comparative claim without objectively comparing one or more specific verifiable features.asa.org.ukview
Person(s) unknown t/a lst Central Insurance Claimline2026-01-07Search (paid), Website (own site)A paid-for Google search ad and a website landing page for an accident management company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business by implying they were a car insurancasa.org.uk—
Adamans Group Ltd2026-01-07Website (own site)A website page for a jeweller misleadingly gave the impression that products were included in a promotional offer and failed to make clear which products were included in the offer.asa.org.uk—
Dean Harrison2026-01-07Search (paid), Website (own site)Three paid-for Google search listings and three websites for an accident claims management company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business by implying they were a carasa.org.uk—
2025 (262 rulings)
AdvertiserDateMediumIssueRulingCompany page
Howserv Ltd t/a Staysure Travel2025-12-24—A TV ad for a travel insurance company misleadingly claimed that there was no age limit to their service.asa.org.uk—
Real Health Supplements Ltd2025-12-24—A website page for a supplement company made claims that their food supplements could prevent, treat or cure human diseases and conditions.asa.org.uk—
GA Trains Limited t/a Greater Anglia2025-12-24Website (own site)A website page for Greater Anglia misleadingly claimed that they offered the cheapest ticket prices.asa.org.uk—
Cult Wines Ltd2025-12-24—A website page for a wine investment company made misleading claims about investment returns. The ad also failed to make clear that wine investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was vasa.org.uk—
Abellio ScotRail Ltd t/a ScotRail2025-12-24—A website for ScotRail misleadingly claimed that they offered the cheapest ticket prices.asa.org.uk—
My Train Ticket Limited t/a mytrainticket.co.uk2025-12-24Website (own site)A website page for MyTrainTicket misleadingly claimed that they offered the cheapest ticket prices.asa.org.uk—
Chike Tech Ltd t/a Brainlab2025-12-17Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a cognitive test company misleadingly claimed that their product could detect the signs of Alzheimer’s and discouraged essential treatment for a condition for which medical asa.org.uk—
MedExpress Enterprises Ltd t/a Bark2025-12-17Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad promoted prescription-only medicines to the public against the law and our rules. The ad also encouraged new mothers to prioritise losing weight by using weight-loss medicationasa.org.uk—
Chequp Health Ltd2025-12-17Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for weight-loss medication promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules, and irresponsibly exploited people’s insecurities around body imageasa.org.uk—
OTTY Sleep Ltd2025-12-17Website (own site)A website page for a mattress company made misleading savings claims.asa.org.uk—
Vir Health Ltd t/a Numan2025-12-17TelevisionA TV ad for a weight-loss programme implied that a medicine could help users resist food temptation in a way that was inconsistent with what the medicine was approved to do and how it worked.asa.org.uk—
WLO Ltd t/a SkinnyJab2025-12-17Social media (paid ad)Two TikTok posts, a website and an Instagram post for weight-loss injections promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
Nutrisslim d o o t/a Nature’s Finest by Nutrisslim UK2025-12-10Search (paid), Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Meta ads and a website for a prostate health supplement made claims that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure enlarged prostate and the symptoms of prostate problems. The ads alasa.org.uk—
Starlink Internet Services Ltd2025-12-10Website (paid ad)A banner ad for an internet provider omitted material information about a promotional price offer.asa.org.uk—
TAYHLI ltd t/a C.A.T.2025-12-10Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad for a nutrition clinic made claims that a food supplement could help reduce traits of autism and made medicinal claims for products that weren’t authorised by the Medicines and Heasa.org.uk—
Healthbio Ltd2025-12-10Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a supplement brand made claims that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure ADHD and made medicinal claims for products that weren’t authorised by the Medicines and Hasa.org.uk—
Get Dopa Ltd2025-12-10Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a supplement brand make claims that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure ADHD and other neurodivergent conditions. The ad also made medicinal claims for products tasa.org.uk—
DSV Communications Ltd t/a The One Broadband2025-12-10Direct mailA direct mailing misleadingly suggested that people at a specific address had been identified as having poor broadband connectivity and speeds. Another issue about a circular was informally resolved aasa.org.uk—
EllaOla Brands Inc t/a EllaOlla2025-12-10Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a supplement retailer made claims that a food supplement could help reduce traits of autism and made medicinal claims for products that weren’t authorised by the Medicines aasa.org.uk—
Impact Herbs t/a Impact Subs2025-12-10Search (paid), Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for a prostate health supplement made claims that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure enlarged prostate and symptoms of prostate problems. The ad also made medicinal claiasa.org.uk—
JR Biomedical Ltd t/a SELFCHECK2025-12-10Search (paid)Two paid-for Google ads for a medical device company made claims that their at home Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) tests could make an accurate medical diagnosis of prostate problems, including prostasa.org.uk—
Lifelab Testing Ltd2025-12-10Search (paid), Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad and a website ad for an at home medical testing company made claims that their at home Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) tests could make an accurate medical diagnosis of prostateasa.org.uk—
Magic Tavern Inc2025-12-10In-game (apps)Three paid-for Meta ads for a mobile app game were socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by normalising, condoning and making light of domestic violence, asa.org.uk—
Muxue Trade Limited t/a Alphacut2025-12-10Search (paid), Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for a prostate health supplement made claims that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure the symptoms of prostate problems and made medicinal claims for products that weren’asa.org.uk—
Nutreance LLC t/a Top 5 Supplements2025-12-10Search (paid), Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Google ads for a prostate health supplement made claims that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure the symptoms of prostate problems and made medicinal claims for products that wasa.org.uk—
Onecare Wellness Pte Ltd2025-12-10Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a supplement brand made claims that a food supplement could help reduce traits of autism, anxiety and learning difficulties. The ad also made medicinal claims for products tasa.org.uk—
Artscapy Ltd2025-12-03Search (paid), Website (own site)A paid-for Google ad for an art investment company failed to make clear that art investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.asa.org.uk—
Woodbury House Ltd2025-12-03Search (paid), Website (own site)Two paid-for Google search ads for an art investment company failed to make clear that art investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.asa.org.uk—
Supergroup Internet Ltd2025-12-03Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad for Superdry made misleading environmental claims.asa.org.uk—
Nike Retail BV2025-12-03Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad for Nike made misleading environmental claims.asa.org.uk—
Lacoste E-commerce t/a Lacoste2025-12-03Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad for Lacoste made misleading environmental claims.asa.org.uk—
Hartco Consultancy2025-12-03Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads for an art investment company failed to make clear that art investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance werenasa.org.uk—
HER Galleries Ltd t/a Her Fine Art2025-12-03Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for an art investment company failed to make clear that art investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t asa.org.uk—
Betway Ltd2025-12-03Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for Betway featured Sir Lewis Hamilton, a person who had strong appeal to under-18s.asa.org.uk—
Storage Giant Ltd2025-11-26Email, Website (own site)Two web pages and an email for a self-storage company made best price guaranteed claims without evidence to support them. They also failed to make sure that quoted prices reflected the total cost peopasa.org.uk—
Good Energy Ltd2025-11-26Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for Good Energy made unsubstantiated savings claims about greener home installation and failed to include all material information.asa.org.ukview
AGN Events t/a Rock N Roll Circus2025-11-26Social media (own site)An Instagram post by Rock N Roll Circus failed to include all the significant conditions of a promotion.asa.org.uk—
Domestika Inc2025-11-26Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook post for an online course provider misleadingly gave the impression that an offer was a one-off purchase when it was only available when signing up to a free trial of a subscriptioasa.org.uk—
Dribble Media Ltd t/a Midnite2025-11-26Social media (own site)A post on Midnite’s X page featured a person who was likely to have strong appeal to under-18s.asa.org.uk—
Ecom7 Ltd t/a BrizaAC2025-11-26Website (paid ad)A paid-for online display ad for a mini-cooler misleadingly exaggerated the effectiveness of a product.asa.org.uk—
FlixBus UK Ltd2025-11-26Social media (own site)A website for FlixBus UK made misleading claims about the price of coach tickets.asa.org.uk—
GGRS Energie Ltd2025-11-26Local or regional newspaper (paid ad)A regional press ad for GGRS Energie made exaggerated and unsubstantiated savings claims about solar installation and failed to include all material information.asa.org.uk—
HydroChill2025-11-26Social media (paid ad)A paid-for YouTube ad for a mini-cooler made exaggerated and unsubstantiated claims about their product’s cooling abilities, cost effectiveness and that their product was a viable and economical alterasa.org.uk—
Trip.com Travel Singapore Pte. Ltd t/a Trip.com2025-11-26Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Meta ads for Trip.com for a promotion caused unnecessary disappointment and didn’t provide people with sufficient information to make an informed decision on whether or not to participateasa.org.uk—
UAB CommerceCore t/a NuraBreeze2025-11-26Social media (paid ad)A paid-for YouTube ad for a mini-cooler made exaggerated and unsubstantiated claims about their product’s cooling abilities, cost effectiveness and that their product was a viable and economical alterasa.org.uk—
UAB Rara Digital t/a Airabreeze2025-11-26Social media (paid ad), Internet (display)Two paid-for online display ads and a paid-for YouTube ad for a mini-cooler made exaggerated and unsubstantiated claims about their product’s cooling abilities, cost effectiveness and that their produasa.org.uk—
Nexters Global Ltd2025-11-19In-game (apps)An app store listing for the ‘Hero Wars: Alliance RPG’ game failed to make clear that it contained loot boxes.asa.org.uk—
Butlins Skyline Ltd t/a Butlins2025-11-19EmailAn email promotion for Butlins wasn’t administered fairly because the closing date of the promotion was changedasa.org.uk—
Travelodge Hotels Ltd2025-11-19Search (paid)Two paid-for search ads for Travelodge made misleading claims about the price of hotel rooms.asa.org.uk—
Booking.com BV2025-11-19Search (paid)A paid-for search ad for Booking.com made misleading claims about the price of hotel rooms.asa.org.uk—
Kabam Games Inc2025-11-19In-game (apps)An app store listing for the ‘Marvel Contest of Champions’ game failed to make clear that it contained loot boxes.asa.org.uk—
Hilton Worldwide Ltd2025-11-19Search (paid)Two paid-for search ads for Hilton made misleading claims about the price of hotel rooms.asa.org.uk—
Select Specs Ltd2025-11-12Television, Social media (own site)A TV and YouTube ad for a glasses retailer made misleading and unverifiable price comparisons with competitor products. The ads also made misleading pricing claims, including by failing to make minimuasa.org.uk—
persons unknown t/a Arthur Mystery Book2025-11-05In-game (apps)An in-game ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence by objectifying and sexualising women and featuring a harmful gender stereotype.asa.org.uk—
Banquist Ltd t/a Winedrops2025-11-05Social media (paid ad), EmailTwo emails and a paid-for Instagram ad for an online wine retailer made misleading and unsubstantiated claims about the origin of their wine. They also failed to make clear the basis of the price compasa.org.uk—
Beautaholics Ltd2025-11-05Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)A paid-for Meta ad and a website page for a hair and skincare retailer which featured an LED facemask made medicinal claims for a product that was not registered with the Medicines and Healthcare prodasa.org.uk—
Cleriva t/a NovaFlow2025-11-05Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads for a sinus clearing device made medical claims for a product that did not have the applicable conformity marking and was not registered with the Medicines and Healthcare proasa.org.uk—
Invention Works BV t/a Silk’n2025-11-05Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)A paid-for Meta ad and website page for a hair and skincare tool retailer, which featured an LED facemask, made medicinal claims for a product that was not registered with the Medicines and Healthcareasa.org.uk—
Luyors Retail Inc2025-11-05Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for a retailer of LED therapy tools, which featured an LED facemask, made medicinal claims for a product that was not registered with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatorasa.org.uk—
On The Beach Ltd2025-11-05Website (own site), TelevisionA TV ad and two website pages for On the Beach misleadingly implied that all consumers with eligible bookings would receive free airport lounge access.asa.org.ukview
Project E Beauty LLC2025-11-05Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)A paid-for Meta ad and a website page for a hair and skincare retailer, which featured an LED facemask made medicinal claims for a product that was not registered with the Medicines and Healthcare proasa.org.uk—
WHG (International) Ltd t/a William Hill Online2025-10-29App (own claim)An in-app ad promoting an offer for a game in the William Hill app misleadingly contradicted the terms and conditions that applied to the offer.asa.org.uk—
Supreme CBD Ltd2025-10-29Social media (own site)A post for SupremeCBD on Anthony Fowler’s Instagram account implied that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure chronic anxiety and depression. It also discouraged essential treatment for condasa.org.uk—
Sweet Bee Organics Ltd2025-10-29Website (own site)A website for a beauty products retailer made medicinal claims about an unlicensed product.asa.org.uk—
Zzoomm plc2025-10-22CircularA circular letter for a broadband provider wasn’t obviously identifiable as marketing material and misled consumers by presenting it in a way that implied they were important notices on broadband disrasa.org.uk—
Betway Ltd2025-10-22Social media (paid ad)A pre-roll ad on YouTube for Betway featured the Chelsea FC logo in a manner which was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.asa.org.uk—
Bonne Terre Ltd t/a Sky Bet2025-10-22Social media (paid ad)[Republished ruling] A promoted tweet for Sky Bet featured Gary Neville, a person who was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.asa.org.uk—
Eaton Gate Gaming Ltd t/a Kwiff2025-10-22Social media (own site)A post on Kwiff’s X account featured Sir Lewis Hamilton, a person who was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.asa.org.uk—
Procter & Gamble UK t/a Ariel2025-10-15TelevisionA TV ad for Ariel laundry pods made an unsubstantiated claim that their product was as effective at cleaning clothes as other products, or when used in combination with laundry additives, and made unvasa.org.uk—
Self Made Girl Boss Ltd2025-10-15Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram post for a business coaching company, misleadingly implied that stated lifestyle and earning results were typical, included qualifications that contradicted the claims that they qasa.org.uk—
Jessica Crane Ltd2025-10-15Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)A paid-for Facebook and Instagram ad for a wealth and business coach company, run by Jessica Crane, misleadingly implied that lifestyle and earnings results were typical, misled in relation to the conasa.org.uk—
Assured Food Standards t/a Red Tractor2025-10-15TelevisionA TV ad for Assured Food Standard’s Red Tractor Scheme failed to make clear exactly which standards it was referring to, or the degree to which those standards were being met when using the claim “farasa.org.uk—
Robbins Research International Inc t/a Tony Robbins2025-10-15Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook post by Tony Robbins advertising a business coaching course misleadingly implied that claimed earnings results were typical.asa.org.uk—
Charlie Johnson2025-10-15Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for social media ads by Charlie Johnson, a business coach in the fitness industry, misleadingly implied that claimed lifestyle and earning results were typical and that a promotion was time lasa.org.uk—
Grant Cardone Training Technologies Inc t/a Grant Cardone2025-10-15Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for an online business event by businessman Grant Cardone misleadingly implied that claimed earnings results were typical.asa.org.uk—
HW Fantasy Ltd t/a My Passion2025-10-15In-game (apps)An in-game ad for an online romantic novel service, seen in a puzzle game was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence, including by trivialising violence against womeasa.org.uk—
Hammonds Furniture Ltd t/a Hammonds2025-10-08Website (own site)A banner ad and a page on the Hammonds Furniture website, misleadingly implied that discount offers were time limited and also made unsubstantiated and unverifiable comparative claims with identifiablasa.org.uk—
Community Fibre Ltd2025-10-08Website (own site)Two pages on the Community Fibre website misleadingly implied that they were the number one rated for internet provider and that they had the most 5 star reviews on third party website.asa.org.uk—
BCCR Ltd t/a Belief Coding Cognitive Rewiring2025-10-01Social media (own site)Two posts on Jessica Cunningham’s Facebook page advertising belief coding discouraged essential treatment for conditions for which medical supervision should be sought and made unsubstantiated claims asa.org.uk—
KP Law Ltd2025-09-24Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)A website and a paid-for Facebook ad for Join the Claim, relating to group action compensation claims by people who had been affected by a data breach, falsely implied that the advertiser was acting fasa.org.uk—
Currys Group Ltd t/a Currys2025-09-24Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for Currys was misleading and socially irresponsible by implying that e-scooters could be ridden on public roads.asa.org.uk—
William Hill Organization Ltd t/a William Hill2025-09-24Point of saleA promotional voucher for William Hill encouraged irresponsible use.asa.org.ukview
Au Vodka Ltd2025-09-24Social media (paid ad), Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A TikTok post by influencer Lucinda Strafford, a paid-for Facebook post featuring influencer Kai Cenat and another paid-for Facebook post advertising AU Vodka were inappropriately targeted, directed aasa.org.uk—
JLG Legal Ltd t/a Johnson Law Group2025-09-24Search (paid), Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)A Google paid-for search ad, a paid-for Facebook ad and website for Johnson Law Group, relating to group action compensation claims by diesel vehicle owners and lessees, failed to make clear that by pasa.org.uk—
Jones Whyte Law Ltd t/a Jones Whyte2025-09-24Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)A website and paid-for Facebook ad for James Whyte, relating to group action compensation claims for people who had been affected by a data breach, failed to present material information clearly and aasa.org.uk—
Marble Muse2025-09-24Website (own site)A website for a clothing company misleadingly implied that they were UK based and omitted the identity and geographical address of the company.asa.org.uk—
Voodoo Doll Ltd t/a MOJO Manchester2025-09-24Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for a bar, which referenced alcoholic drinks, was irresponsible by being likely to have particular appeal to under-18s and by encouraging excessive drinking.asa.org.uk—
Person(s) Unknown t/a YourDailyPatch2025-09-17Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad for diet patches made unsubstantiated and misleading claims that their patch could assist with fat burning and weight-loss.asa.org.uk—
Gorgeous Shard Puzzle Studio2025-09-17In-game (apps)An in-game ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence, including by objectifying and sexualising women and featuring a harmful gender stereoasa.org.uk—
Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Ltd t/a AliExpress2025-09-17Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for the AliExpress shopping app was misleading by showing a product as part of a promotion when it was not actually available at the price stated.asa.org.uk—
Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Ltd t/a AliExpress2025-09-17Search (paid), EmailAn email and paid-for Google search ad for AliExpress made misleading price statements.asa.org.uk—
Indigo Sun Retail Ltd t/a Indigo Sun2025-09-17Website (own site)A website for a sunbed tanning salon company made misleading and irresponsible claims about the health benefits that could be obtained from the use of sunbeds.asa.org.uk—
Dribble Media Ltd t/a Midnite2025-09-17Social media (own site)A post on Midnite’s X page featuring an AI generated video depicting footballer Trent Alexander-Arnold had strong appeal to under-18s.asa.org.uk—
Simmer Ltd2025-09-17Social media (paid ad)A paid-for TikTok ad for a meal prep service misleadingly implied that their menu was curated by chefs who had been awarded a Michelin star.asa.org.uk—
Menwell Ltd t/a Voy2025-09-17Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad for weight-loss treatments promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
Dr Vegan Ltd2025-09-10Social media (own site)An Instagram post for Dr Vegan Ltd claimed that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure symptoms of the menopause and made medicinal claims for products that weren’t authorised by the Medicinesasa.org.uk—
Mast-Jagermeister UK t/a Jägermeister2025-09-10Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook and Instagram ads for Jägermeister were socially irresponsible and implied that alcohol was a key component of the success of a social event.asa.org.uk—
Heineken UK Ltd2025-09-10Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram post by the comedian Al Nash advertising Strongbow, implied that alcohol was indispensable and took priority in life.asa.org.uk—
Barrhead Travel Service Ltd t/a Barrhead Travel2025-09-03Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad for a travel agency gave a misleading impression of the advertised cruises’ environmental impact by failing to make the basis of environmental claims clear and not holding robust asa.org.ukview
BetterVits LLC2025-09-03Social media (own site)An Instagram post by the influencer Doctor Shireen made unauthorised health claims in relation to food supplements, exaggerated authorised health claims and made health claims that referred to the recasa.org.uk—
Easytek Ltd t/a Vape Superstore2025-09-03Website (own site)A website for a vape retailer misleadingly implied that their products had been tested and endorsed by the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency.asa.org.uk—
Imperial Tobacco Ltd t/a Rizla UK2025-09-03Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for Rizla UK was socially irresponsible and condoned the use of illegal drugs by trivialising recreational drug use.asa.org.uk—
KamaGames Ltd t/a Blackjackist2025-09-03Social media (paid ad)A paid-for X ad for the Blackjack 21: Blackjackist game misleadingly stated that the game didn’t contain in-game purchases, including random-item purchases.asa.org.uk—
Sunshine Cruise Holidays Ltd t/a cruise 1st2025-09-03Website (own site)A webpage advertising a cruise operator failed to make the basis of environmental and comparative claims clear, didn’t hold appropriate evidence to support such claims and omitted material informationasa.org.uk—
TravelCircle Ltd t/a Cruise Circle2025-09-03Website (own site)A webpage advertising cruise operator failed to make the basis of environmental and comparative claims clear and didn’t substantiate the environmental claims made in relation to the full life cycle ofasa.org.uk—
www.Cruise.co.uk Ltd t/a SeaScanner2025-09-03Website (own site)A webpage advertising a cruise operator made misleading environmental and comparative claims, including by omitting material information about the environmental impact of the advertised cruise ship.asa.org.uk—
SP Graham Retail Ltd2025-08-27CircularA voucher for Sean Graham bookmakers didn’t include all the significant conditions of the promotion and also failed to administer the promotion fairly.asa.org.uk—
Trainline.com Ltd2025-08-27Video on demand, RadioA Video on Demand ad and a radio ad for Trainline made misleading and unsubstantiated claims that they offered the cheapest ticket prices.asa.org.uk—
Team RH Fitness Ltd2025-08-27Website (own site)A webpage advertising a health and fitness app was misleading as it failed to make clear that a subscription had a minimum commitment period of a 12-months.asa.org.uk—
Locksley Distilling Co Ltd2025-08-27Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook and Instagram ad for a bottle of gin implied that a drink may be preferred because of its higher alcohol content.asa.org.uk—
Ambassador Cruise Holidays Ltd2025-08-27EmailAn email advertising offers on cruises made misleading savings claims.asa.org.uk—
CTW Inc2025-08-27Social media (paid ad)Three paid-for YouTube ads for a video-game company were socially irresponsible, likely to cause serious or widespread offence and featured harmful gender stereotypes by objectifying and sexualising wasa.org.uk—
Contact Solar Ltd2025-08-27Search (paid)A paid-for Bing search ad for a solar panel installation company made unsubstantiated price claims and omitted material information that was likely to affect consumers’ understanding of the price claiasa.org.uk—
Domino's Pizza UK & Ireland Ltd2025-08-27Social media (paid ad)A paid-for YouTube ad for a HFSS product wasn’t appropriately targeted and appeared in media that was likely to appeal to under-16s.asa.org.uk—
Formulapower/fuelcat Ltd t/a Fuel Cat2025-08-27Website (own site)A website for a company selling fuel catalysts made unsubstantiated claims that their products could improve engine efficiency.asa.org.uk—
Lloyds Bank plc t/a Lloyds Banking Group (LBG)2025-08-20National pressA national press ad for Lloyds Bank misleadingly implied that they had made donations to social housing projects and omitted significant information that put these claims into context.asa.org.uk—
LanguageNut Ltd2025-08-20Website (own site)A blog page featured on a language learning platform made unsubstantiated comparative claims against competitors and failed to included information to allow consumers to verify these claims.asa.org.uk—
Colgate-Palmolive (UK) Ltd2025-08-20—A TV ad for Sanex shower gel was likely to cause serious offence by featuring a racial stereotype.asa.org.uk—
Thomas Keith Ltd t/a Thomas Keith Independent School2025-08-13Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad made misleading claims about the location and ranking of a school.asa.org.uk—
Amazing Giveaways Ltd2025-08-13Social media (own site)A Facebook post for a prize draw wasn't administered fairly and caused unnecessary disappointment.asa.org.uk—
Cheeky Baby Products Ltd2025-08-06Website (own site)A blog post misleadingly implied that reusable nappies could help earlier toilet training.asa.org.uk—
EDF Energy Ltd t/a EDF2025-08-06Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad for heat pump installation omitted material information about the eligibility criteria for government funding available for installing the pumps.asa.org.ukview
Evolution Slimming Ltd2025-08-06Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for food supplements made unauthorised and misleading medical and health claims for weight loss.asa.org.uk—
Inkitt GmbH t/a Inkitt2025-08-06In-game (apps)An in-app ad was not appropriately targeted and contained scenes that condoned sexually violent behaviour and were likely to cause serious and widespread offence.asa.org.uk—
Myota GmbH2025-08-06Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads for food supplements made unauthorised and misleading medical and health claims for weight loss.asa.org.uk—
We Buy Any Car Ltd t/a webuyanycar.com2025-08-06Television, Internet (video)A TV and YouTube ad made misleading comparative claims with identifiable competitors.asa.org.uk—
The Clean Supps LLC t/a Inno Supps2025-08-06Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Meta ads for food supplements made unauthorised and misleading medical and health claims for weight loss.asa.org.uk—
Pheon Inc2025-08-06In-game advertising, Social media (paid ad)An in-game ad and a paid-for social media ad for an AI Chat Bot, portrayed the character as under-18 and was likely to cause serious or widespread offence by stereotyping women as sexual objects.asa.org.uk—
Ovira Australia t/a Ovira UK2025-08-06Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Meta ads for food supplements made unauthorised and misleading medical and health claims for weight loss.asa.org.uk—
Aira Home UK Ltd2025-08-06Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for heat pump installation omitted material information about the eligibility criteria for government funding available for installing the pumps.asa.org.uk—
Amazon Europe Core Sarl t/a Amazon.co.uk2025-08-06Website (own site)A webpage on Amazon.co.uk showed unclear options to purchase Amazon Prime and was misleading for consumers.asa.org.uk—
Arrae Inc2025-08-06Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Meta ads for food supplements made unauthorised and misleading medical and health claims for weight loss.asa.org.uk—
BrewDog plc2025-08-06PosterA poster broke the strict alcohol advertising rules because it implied that alcohol could overcome boredom, loneliness or other problems.asa.org.uk—
Energystore Ltd2025-08-06Local or regional newspaper (paid ad)A local press ad for a loft and wall cavity insulation installation company was misleading because it omitted material information about the government funding available for installing insulation prodasa.org.uk—
Octopus Energy Ltd2025-07-30Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for heat pump installation made unsubstantiated price claims and failed to include material information about a government grant, including eligibility criteria.asa.org.ukview
Viridian International Ltd t/a Viridian2025-07-30Magazine (paid ad), Website (own site)A website and magazine ad made unsubstantiated claims that a supplement didn't contain any ultra-processed ingredients and also discredited and denigrated other nutritional supplements.asa.org.uk—
Reform Technologies Ltd t/a Reformed2025-07-30Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Pinterest ad for a matcha drink was socially irresponsible, including by encouraging irresponsible dietary habits.asa.org.uk—
Origin Sleep UK Ltd t/a Origin Mattress2025-07-30Website (own site)A website for Origin Mattress made misleading claims about reference prices and associated savings.asa.org.uk—
We Love Holidays Ltd t/a LoveHolidays2025-07-23Website (own site)Two holiday listings on the loveholidays website made misleading price claims.asa.org.ukview
Hollywoodbets International UK Ltd t/a Hollywoodbets2025-07-23Website (paid ad)A banner ad for Hollywood bets seen on the Virtual Football League website was inappropriately targeted to under-18s.asa.org.uk—
Viva!2025-07-16Cinema (ad)A cinema ad for the vegan charity Viva!, featuring scenes of a human baby being taken from its mother and equating that with dairy calves being separated from their mothers, was irresponsible, distresasa.org.uk—
Trip Drink Ltd2025-07-16Website (own site)A website for TRIP drinks, made unauthorised claims that the drink could prevent, cure or treat human disease. As well as unauthorised nutrition and health claims.asa.org.uk—
Tonic Nutrition Ltd t/a Tonic Health2025-07-16Internet (website content), Social media (own site)A website review page and an Instagram reel, for a sleep supplement, featured misleading customer reviews and made unauthorised specific and comparative health claims.asa.org.uk—
Play’n GO Malta Ltd2025-07-16Internet (display)Three banner ads promoting casino gaming content were likely to have strong appeal to under-18s and were therefore irresponsible.asa.org.uk—
PharmaRx Ltd t/a Cloud Pharmacy2025-07-09Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for weight-loss treatments promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
Detox Today2025-07-09Website (own site)A website homepage for an alcohol addiction help and support service misleadingly implied that the advertiser directly provided registered medical treatment.asa.org.uk—
Yazen Health AB t/a Yazen2025-07-09Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram post by Gemma Collins promoting a weight-loss app and medication advertised prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
SemaPen Ltd2025-07-09Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad for a weight-loss pen program promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
Phlo Technologies Ltd t/a Phlo Clinic2025-07-09Search (paid)A paid-for Google search ad for weight-loss injections promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
Chequp Health Ltd2025-07-09Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for weight-loss treatments promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
Express Healthcare Ltd t/a pharmacyonline.co.uk2025-07-09Search (paid)A paid-for Google search ad for obesity treatment jabs promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
Glamour Shots2025-07-09Search (paid)A paid-for Google search ad for eBay was irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence by objectifying and sexualising women.asa.org.uk—
Hexpress Healthcare Ltd t/a HealthExpress.co.uk2025-07-09Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for weight-loss injections promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
Juniper Technologies UK Ltd2025-07-09Search (paid)A paid-for Google search ad for weight-loss injections promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
MyFlowers Ltd t/a MyFlowers2025-07-09Search (paid)A paid-for Google search ad and a website for a flower delivery service misleadingly implied that same-day delivery was available in all instances and for all UK addresses.asa.org.uk—
Nipper&Co Ltd t/a Nipper & Co2025-07-09Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a lactation tea made unauthorised specific health claims.asa.org.uk—
PepsiCo International Ltd t/a Lipton Tea2025-07-09Social media (own site)An Instagram and TikTok post by Lipton Ice Tea misleadingly gave the impression that the Peach Lipton Ice Tea was being discontinued.asa.org.uk—
Phlo Technologies Ltd t/a Phlo Clinic2025-07-09Search (paid)A paid-for Google search ad for weight-loss treatments promoted prescription-only medicines to the public, against the law and our rules.asa.org.uk—
Mondelez UK Ltd t/a Cadbury2025-07-02RadioA radio ad made nutrition and comparative nutrition claims that didn’t meet the conditions of use for those claims.asa.org.uk—
Wuxi Zhan'ao E-commerce Co Ltd t/a Lpows.com2025-07-02Website (paid ad)A paid-for YouTube ad featured a gender stereotype that was likely to cause harm or serious offence.asa.org.uk—
Wowcher Ltd2025-07-02Website (own site)A website made misleading savings claims.asa.org.ukview
Wowcher Ltd2025-07-02Website (own site)A website failed to administer a promotion fairly and caused unnecessary disappointment.asa.org.ukview
Cosmos Oyun Yazilim Sanayi Ticaret Ltd Sirketi t/a Filter AI2025-07-02In-game (apps)An in-game ad was socially irresponsible and caused serious offence, including by featuring a harmful gender stereotype that objectified women.asa.org.uk—
GTOHero Ltd t/a GTO Hero2025-07-02Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Reddit ad misleadingly suggested that a poker Real Time Assistance app could legitimately be used during live play on sites that prohibited their use.asa.org.uk—
Good Guru Ltd t/a Protein World2025-07-02EmailAn email made claims that a food could treat anorexia.asa.org.uk—
Kenvue UK Ltd t/a Listerine2025-07-02TelevisionA TV ad misleadingly exaggerated the performance of a product.asa.org.uk—
LEBOM Ltd2025-07-02Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad and a paid-for X ad encouraged gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible and encouraged excessive drinking.asa.org.uk—
HOMA Games SAS2025-06-25—An in-game ad was socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence, including by featuring a harmful stereotype by objectifying women.asa.org.uk—
SaffPro2025-06-25—A TikTok post and a paid-for Facebook ad made unauthorised specific health claims, claimed that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure ADHD and irresponsibly encouraged people to stop taking masa.org.uk—
Bodystreet Franchise (UK) Ltd t/a Bodystreet2025-06-25—A website made unsubstantiated claims that 20 minutes of exercise at their studio was enough for a week, that Electro Muscle Stimulation (EMS) training would lead to a reduction in body fat in a shortasa.org.uk—
Honeytech Ltd t/a Honeytoon2025-06-25—Two paid-for X ads were socially irresponsible, featured harmful gender stereotypes and caused serious or widespread offence, including referencing incest, featuring scenes that depicted women as objeasa.org.uk—
Koi Footwear Ltd2025-06-18EmailAn email was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence by condoning drug use.asa.org.uk—
CLF Distribution Ltd2025-06-11EmailAn email misleadingly claimed that products only contained “naturally sweet ingredients”.asa.org.uk—
Navi Organics Ltd2025-06-11Website (own site)A website made unsubstantiated efficacy claims and discouraged essential treatment for conditions for which medical supervision should be sought.asa.org.uk—
Mars Wrigley Confectionery UK Ltd2025-06-11Television, Video on demandA TV and Video on Demand ad condoned unsafe driving.asa.org.uk—
Menwell Ltd t/a Manual2025-06-04Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad promoted a prescription-only medicine to the general public.asa.org.uk—
LiveScore Betting & Gaming (Gibraltar) Ltd t/a LiveScore Bet2025-06-04App (paid ad)Two in-app ads seen on the LiveScore app were inappropriately targeted towards under-18s.asa.org.uk—
air up GmbH2025-05-28Social media (paid ad)A paid-for TikTok ad was irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offense.asa.org.uk—
AirDoctor LLC t/a AmazingAir2025-05-28—A post on the health.detective Garstang Health Food Store’s TikTok account wasn't obviously identifiable as an ad and made medical claims for an unlicensed product.asa.org.uk—
Turner Lewis Ltd2025-05-28Social media (own site)A TikTok post and a website misled people about the nature of their business, omitted material information, took advantage of people's inexperience and credulity and failed to be upfront about signifiasa.org.uk—
UAB Convenity t/a Huusk2025-05-28—A TV ad for Huusk Knives was irresponsibly scheduled.asa.org.uk—
Viva Research Ltd t/a Vivanmn2025-05-28Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads claimed that a food supplement could treat or cure ADHD, made medicinal claims for an unlicensed product and made unauthorised specific health claims.asa.org.uk—
GreenPixel Ltd t/a Hotel Merge Empire2025-05-21Game (mobile/app)An in-game ad was likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by condoning domestic violence.asa.org.uk—
Insulet International Limited t/a Omnipod2025-05-21Internet (video)A video on demand ad failed to present qualifying text clearly.asa.org.uk—
Phusion Projects LLC t/a FourLoko2025-05-21Social media (own site)An Instagram ad was socially irresponsible and encouraged people to adopt an unwise drinking style.asa.org.uk—
Vodafone Ltd t/a vodafone2025-05-21Internet (on own site)A website made misleading savings claims and implied that a promotional price was time-limited when this wasn't the case.asa.org.ukview
Golden Vape UK Ltd t/a Golden Vape2025-05-14Search (paid)A paid for Google ad promoted unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes through a sponsored link.asa.org.uk—
UK Electronic Cigarette Ltd t/a UKVAPINGSTORE2025-05-14Search (paid)A paid for Google ad promoted unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes through a sponsored link.asa.org.uk—
Cloud Whale Interactive Technology2025-05-07In-game (apps)An in-game ad was socially irresponsible, likely to cause serious or widespread offence and was irresponsibly targetedasa.org.uk—
Whaleco UK Ltd t/a Temu2025-05-07In-game (apps)An in-game ad was likely to cause serious or widespread offence.asa.org.uk—
Living and Home Ltd2025-05-07Website (commercial classified)A product listing made misleading and unsubstantiated savings claims.asa.org.uk—
Rosenthal Capital Ltd t/a ULEZProsperity2025-05-07Website (own site)A website made misleading and unsubstantiated investment returns claims and promoted a financial product in a way that couldn't be easily understood.asa.org.uk—
Groupon International Ltd2025-04-30Website (own site)A website made misleading pricing and savings claims.asa.org.uk—
Lavazza Coffee (UK) Ltd2025-04-30Search (paid)A paid-for search ad misleadingly implied that coffee pods could be composted at home when this wasn't the case.asa.org.uk—
Dualit Ltd2025-04-30Search (paid)A paid-for search ad misleadingly implied that coffee bags could be composted at home when this wasn't the case.asa.org.uk—
FX Compared Ltd t/a FXcompared2025-04-23Website (own site)A website made misleading savings claims and implied that the international money transfer providers they recommended were the top providers compared to all other providers when they only included proasa.org.uk—
ABD Supplies Ltd2025-04-23Email, Website (own site)Two emails and two product listings misleadingly and irresponsibly suggested that HID and LED conversion kits could be used by most vehicles on public roads.asa.org.uk—
Holiday Gems Ltd2025-04-23Website (own site)A booking webpage for a holiday made misleading price claims.asa.org.uk—
NKD Medical Ltd t/a Dr Ducu London2025-04-16Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad for Dr. Ducu, a cosmetic treatment provider, irresponsibly pressured consumers into booking, and trivialised the risks of, “liquid BBLs” (Brazilian Butt Lift).asa.org.uk—
2XU UK Limited2025-04-16Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad for 2xu Recovery Compression Tights made medical claims without holding the applicable conformity marking and were not registered with the MHRA.asa.org.uk—
Beautyjenics Ltd2025-04-16Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for Beautyjenics, a cosmetic treatment provider, irresponsibly pressured consumers into booking, and trivialised the risks of, “liquid BBLs” (Brazilian Butt Lift) and exploited asa.org.uk—
Bomb Doll Aesthetics2025-04-16Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for Bomb Doll Aesthetics, a Black Friday promotion, irresponsibly pressured consumers into booking, and trivialised the risks of, “liquid BBLs” (Brazilian Butt Lift).asa.org.uk—
CCskinlondondubai2025-04-16Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for CCskinlondondubai, a cosmetic treatment provider, irresponsibly pressured consumers into booking, and trivialised the risks of, “liquid BBLs” (Brazilian Butt Lift) and exploasa.org.uk—
Cambridge Corporate Consultants Ltd t/a The Claims Guide2025-04-16Social media (own site)An post on X by The Claims Guide misleadingly implied that their company was approved, endorsed or authorised by the UK Government.asa.org.uk—
EME Aesthetics & Beauty Academy Ltd2025-04-16Social media (paid ad)An Instagram ad for EME Aesthetics, a Black Friday promotion, irresponsibly pressured consumers into booking, and trivialised the risks of, “liquid BBLs” (Brazilian Butt Lift).asa.org.uk—
Global Brands Ltd t/a VK2025-04-16Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram story posted by @vkdrink was socially irresponsible by implying that drinking alcohol could overcome boredom.asa.org.uk—
Groupe SEB UK Ltd t/a Tefal2025-04-16Website (own site)A website product page for a set of pans misleadingly implied that a discount offer could be used for particular products when that was not the case.asa.org.uk—
Montdog Ltd t/a Wild Pack2025-04-16Social media (own site)Two posts for dogfood company on their Instagram page featured videos of Geogia Toffolo made misleading claims that other pet food products posed significant health risks or led to chronic diseases, tasa.org.uk—
Pressplay Ltd2025-04-16Press other (paid ad)A press ad for anti-glare driving glasses misleadingly implied they could prevent glare while driving and could make driving safer.asa.org.uk—
Rejuvenate Academy Ltd t/a Rejuvenate Clinics2025-04-16Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for Rejuvenate Clinics, a cosmetic treatment provider, irresponsibly pressured consumers into booking, and trivialised the risks of, “liquid BBLs” (Brazilian Butt Lift).asa.org.uk—
The Innovative Brewing Company Ltd t/a Prime Time Lager2025-04-16PosterA poster ad for Prime Time Lager made health and nutrition claims not permitted for alcoholic drinks.asa.org.uk—
Belle Baby Ltd2025-04-09Website (own site)A website, which featured a product listing for a swimsuit, included an image of a child portrayed in a sexual way.asa.org.uk—
Person(s) Unknown t/a Henry’s Boots2025-04-09Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad and website made misleading claims including that their products were handmade and that they were closing down and also failed to include the geographical address from which theasa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a Rosely London2025-04-09Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad and website made misleading claims including about the materials used to make products and money-back guarantees and also failed to include the geographical address from which tasa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a Velora London2025-04-09App (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad and website made misleading claims including about where the business was based, materials used to make products, delivery times and money-back guarantees and also failed to incasa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a Luxelle-London2025-04-09Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)Two paid-for Facebook ads and a website misleadingly implied they were a UK-based company and failed to include the geographical address from which they operated.asa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a Muse2025-04-09Internet (website content)A website misleadingly implied they were a UK-based company and failed to include the geographical address from which they operated.asa.org.uk—
TotalEnergies SE2025-04-09Social media (paid ad)A paid-for X ad for TotalEnergies omitted material information about the proportion of their overall business activities that comprised lower-carbon activities.asa.org.uk—
Viagogo GmbH2025-04-09Audio (podcast)A podcast ad claimed that over half the events listed on Viagogo had tickets selling below face value when this wasn’t the case.asa.org.uk—
OceanSaver Ltd2025-04-02Website (own site), TelevisionA website and TV ad made unsubstantiated environmental claims.asa.org.uk—
Rosenthal Capital Ltd t/a ULEZPROSPERITY2025-04-02RadioTwo radio ads which implied that buying and letting cars had investment potential were broadcast on a non-specialist station.asa.org.uk—
John Mills Ltd t/a JML Direct2025-03-26TelevisionA TV ad made unsubstantiated claims about the efficacy of a shapewear product.asa.org.uk—
Stars Interactive Ltd t/a PokerStars2025-03-26Social media (own site)An Instagram ad portrayed gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible by trivialising gambling, encouraging repetitive participation and describing gambling as an investment.asa.org.uk—
EE Ltd t/a EE2025-03-26Social media (paid ad), Television, RadioA TV, radio, paid-for social media and digital poster ad for EE made unsubstantiated claims about the performance and capabilities of a Wi-Fi router.asa.org.ukview
A3 Games Pte Ltd t/a Top Girl2025-03-26Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad was socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence, including by featuring a harmful gender stereotype by objectifying and sexualising women.asa.org.uk—
Bestway Retail Ltd t/a Bargain Booze2025-03-19Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram and Facebook ad for alcohol which featured Father Christmas was of particular appeal to under-18s.asa.org.uk—
Haven Leisure Ltd2025-03-19Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad and website made misleading price claims.asa.org.uk—
Shop TJC Ltd t/a Ideal World2025-03-12TelevisionA teleshopping presentation made unsubstantiated price and savings claims.asa.org.uk—
Dawn Hazeldine t/a Stockport Counselling Services2025-03-12Internet (website content)A webpage misleadingly claimed that they were associated with the BACP and implied that they’d received training and qualifications from them when this wasn't the case.asa.org.uk—
Petchip.Network2025-03-12Search (paid)Two paid-for Google search ads for Petchip.Network misleadingly implied they were an approved database to comply with the legal requirements for microchipping cats and dogs.asa.org.uk—
Shenzhenshi Senyi Dianzi Shangwu Youxiangongsi t/a Plum-Marketing2025-03-12Internet (classified)An Amazon product listing was socially irresponsible as it condoned an unsafe practice and featured very young children playing with a toy that was likely to cause them physical harm.asa.org.uk—
Gemporia Ltd2025-03-05TelevisionA teleshopping presentation misleadingly compared the price of a product to the price of a non-identical competitor product and failed to substantiate price statements.asa.org.uk—
Maki Online Services Ltd2025-02-26EmailAn email misrepresented the consequences of not renewing an expired document and didn't make clear that an eVisa could be obtained for free via the Government’s website.asa.org.uk—
Secret Escapes Ltd2025-02-19Website (own site)A website made misleading price comparisons and failed to make the basis of price comparisons clear.asa.org.uk—
EDF Energy Ltd2025-02-19RadioA radio ad was misleading as it omitted information and didn’t make the basis of the claims made in the ad clear.asa.org.ukview
Floor Design Ltd t/a Flooring by Nature2025-02-19Website (own site)A website failed to substantiate environmental claims and didn’t make clear that these claims referred to only part of a carpet, and the actions people would need to take for their carpet to successfuasa.org.uk—
Intelligent Lending Ltd t/a Ocean Finance2025-02-19Social media (paid ad), Internet (display)A paid-for Meta ad and display ad irresponsibly encouraged consumers to spend regularly on non-essential purchases using a credit card.asa.org.uk—
Meggan Kirkland2025-02-19Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A promotion on Meggan Kirkland’s Instagram account wasn’t administered fairly.asa.org.uk—
Supplylife Group Ltd t/a SUPPLYlife2025-02-19Website (own site)A website misleadingly stated that, informed by their testing, an elimination diet could help food related energy dips, unwanted weight and IBS or its symptoms.asa.org.uk—
Luxury Lodge Estates Company Ltd t/a Luxury Lodges2025-02-12Magazine (paid ad)A magazine ad didn’t make clear that the value of investments was variable, and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future. It also failed to make the nature of a guarasa.org.uk—
Connect UK Sales Ltd2025-02-12Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)A paid-for Facebook ad and website landing page didn’t make clear that the value of investments was variable and failed to provide evidence to substantiate investment claims and price comparisons.asa.org.uk—
Family Vision Ltd2025-02-12Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad irresponsibly encouraged the use of credit agreements to fund Christmas spending.asa.org.uk—
High Seat Ltd t/a HSL2025-02-12Email, Website (own site), LeafletA website, two emails and a leaflet didn’t make the limitations for guaranteed Christmas delivery clear.asa.org.uk—
INSTITUTO NATURVITA S.L. t/a Natur Vital2025-02-12Website (own site)A webpage misleadingly and irresponsibly implied that hair colourants were safe for people with an allergy to PPD.asa.org.uk—
Land Profits EDU Ltd t/a Land Profits2025-02-12Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)Two paid-for Facebook posts and a website didn’t make clear that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future and also failed tasa.org.uk—
SteadyPay Ltd2025-02-12Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad irresponsibly encouraged people to borrow money for the Black Friday sales and to spend more than they could afford.asa.org.uk—
Wilton Bradley Ltd t/a Xootz2025-02-12Website (own site), TelevisionA TV ad and product page was misleading and socially irresponsible by failing to disclose that private e-scooters couldn’t be legally used in public places.asa.org.uk—
Next Retail Ltd t/a NEXT2025-02-12Website (own site)A product listing on the NEXT website irresponsibly portrayed a model as being unhealthily thin.asa.org.ukview
DragonPlus Game Ltd t/a Happy Hospital2025-02-05In-game (apps)An in-app ad was socially irresponsible and caused unjustified distress and serious offence by trivialising miscarriage and stillbirth.asa.org.uk—
ScottishPower Energy Retail Ltd t/a Scottish Power2025-02-05TelevisionA TV ad featuring George Clarke wasn't quickly recognisable as an ad and led viewers to believe they were watching a programme.asa.org.ukview
Wireless Group Media (GB) Ltd t/a Virgin Radio2025-02-05Website (own site)A promotion on Virgin Radio's website wasn't administered fairly and caused unnecessary disappointment.asa.org.uk—
Astrasoft Projects Ltd t/a Sofiadate.com2025-02-05Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad featured harmful stereotypes likely to cause serious or widespread offence.asa.org.uk—
Banquist Ltd t/a Winedrops2025-02-05Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad and sponsored Instagram story made unsubstantiated price comparison claims and misleadingly implied that reviews and ratings were from a third-party review website when this wasasa.org.uk—
Visual Stress Consultancy Ltd2025-01-29Website (own site)A website made unsubstantiated claims that tinted glasses could be used for driving at night and condoned unsafe driving.asa.org.uk—
Health Line2025-01-22Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads misleadingly exaggerated the capabilities of laser eye treatment, falsely implied that they directly provided laser eye treatment themselves and didn't make clear that they rasa.org.uk—
Zimran Ltd t/a Prosperi Academy2025-01-15Social media (paid ad), Internet (video)A paid-for YouTube ad for an app offering financial investment training courses didn't make clear that the value of investments was variable and irresponsibly took advantage of people's lack of experiasa.org.uk—
The Essence Vault Ltd2025-01-15Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad made misleading pricing claims.asa.org.uk—
Royalux Competitions Ltd2025-01-15Website (own site)A prize draw wasn't administered fairly and caused unnecessary disappointment.asa.org.uk—
Marren Healthcare Ltd2025-01-08Website (own site)A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they owned clinics and that local rehab centres could be accessed using thasa.org.uk—
Wahed Invest Ltd2025-01-08PosterSix posters which appeared on the TfL network caused serious offence by featuring images of burning US dollar and Euro banknotes.asa.org.uk—
Vacaciones eDreams, S.L. t/a eDreams2025-01-08Internet (display)Two paid-for online display ads made unsubstantiated environmental claims.asa.org.uk—
Endrick Clothing Ltd2025-01-08Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Two Instagram posts were not clearly identifiable as marketing communication and portrayed smoking in an appealing manner which is against the ad rules.asa.org.uk—
2024 (254 rulings)
AdvertiserDateMediumIssueRulingCompany page
Person(s) unknown t/a Sereni2024-12-18Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad made medical claims for a product which didn’t have the relevant compliance labels.asa.org.uk—
Action Rehab2024-12-18Website (own site)A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they owned clinics and that they had been approved by a public body. It alasa.org.uk—
Addiction Recovery Systems Ltd t/a Rehab Guide2024-12-18Internet (website content)A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business and that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated and also failasa.org.uk—
Auto Finesse Ltd2024-12-18Social media (own site)An Instagram ad was socially irresponsible and caused serious offence by featuring a harmful stereotype by objectifying and sexualising women.asa.org.uk—
Beer52 Ltd2024-12-18EmailTwo email promotions omitted significant conditions.asa.org.uk—
Better Health and Wellness2024-12-18Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad was misleading as it didn’t make clear the nature of the content people would be served if they engaged with the ad.asa.org.uk—
Health and Wellness2024-12-18Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad was misleading as it didn’t make clear the nature of the content people would be served if they engaged with the ad and also exaggerated the capability of laser eye treatment.asa.org.uk—
Help 4 Addiction Ltd2024-12-18Website (own site)A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated and that a localasa.org.uk—
IT Career Change Ltd2024-12-18InternetA listing on a job vacancy website misleadingly implied they were offering genuine job vacancies.asa.org.uk—
Marketing VF Ltd t/a The Eco Experts2024-12-18Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a laser eye surgery referral company falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their business and that they directly provided laser eye surgery when this wasn’t asa.org.uk—
Oakever Games PTE Ltd2024-12-18In-game (apps)Two in-game ads made medical claims for an unregistered device which didn’t hold the relevant compliance labels and made unsubstantiated claims that an app could improve memory and sleep.asa.org.uk—
Origin Sleep UK Ltd t/a Origin Mattress2024-12-18Website (own site)A website implied that a promotion was time limited when this wasn’t the case, made misleading and unsubstantiated savings claims and made unsubstantiated claims about the health properties of their pasa.org.uk—
Rehabs.uk2024-12-18Website (own site)A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business and that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated and also failasa.org.uk—
Serenity Rehabilitation Ltd t/a Serenity Addiction Centres2024-12-18Website (own site)A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated and that they haasa.org.uk—
UK Addiction Treatment Ltd t/a UKAT2024-12-18Website (own site)A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business and misleadingly suggested that their service was impartial and that they offereasa.org.uk—
Valterous Ltd t/a Therapie Clinic2024-12-18Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad indirectly advertised a prescription only medicine to the public.asa.org.uk—
Vivostore Ltd t/a Vivo Life2024-12-18Social media (own site)Two TikTok ads stated that a food supplement could treat vitamin B12 deficiency or its symptoms, irresponsibly encouraged people to stop taking medically prescribed vitamin B12 injections and made unaasa.org.uk—
Which Rehab Ltd2024-12-18Website (own site)A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated, that they had aasa.org.uk—
ECO4U LTD2024-12-11Social media (paid ad)Four paid-for Facebook ads offering a home efficiency scheme grant misleadingly implied that the company was endorsed by or associated with the UK Government, falsely implied that they themselves wereasa.org.uk—
Ovira Australia t/a Ovira UK2024-12-11Social media (paid ad)Three paid-for Meta ads made unauthorised specific health claims, referred to an amount of weight loss, implied a food could prevent, treat or cure PCOS and symptoms of the menopause and made medicinaasa.org.uk—
Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd t/a Samsung2024-12-11Website (own site)A cashback promotion on the Samsung website caused unnecessary disappointment and wasn’t administered fairly.asa.org.uk—
Sparring Partners Ltd t/a Gymbox2024-12-11Social media (own site)An Instagram ad was socially irresponsible and caused undue distress.asa.org.uk—
get_0ut_0f_debt Ltd2024-12-11Social media (own site)A video on the get_0ut_0f_debt TikTok account was irresponsible and caused serious offense and unjustified distress.asa.org.uk—
Ignite Sustainable Energy Ltd t/a ignitese.co.uk2024-12-11Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook and Instagram ads offering a home efficiency scheme grant misleadingly implied that the company was endorsed by or associated with the UK Government.asa.org.uk—
Impact Energy Ltd2024-12-11Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Meta ads offering a home efficiency scheme grant misleadingly implied that the company was endorsed by or associated with the UK Government.asa.org.uk—
Jaded London Ltd2024-12-11Social media (own site)An Instagram post was socially irresponsible and caused serious offense by featuring a harmful stereotype by objectifying and sexualising women.asa.org.uk—
Lead Pronto Ltd t/a LeadPronto2024-12-11Social media (paid ad)Four paid-for Meta ads offering a home efficiency scheme grant misleadingly implied that the company was endorsed by or associated with the UK Government, falsely implied that they themselves were offasa.org.uk—
Alchemy Bros Ltd t/a Energy Grant Access2024-12-11Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad offering a home efficiency scheme grant misleadingly implied that the company was endorsed by or associated with the Scottish Government, falsely implied that they were acting for pasa.org.uk—
Pulsio Ltd2024-12-11Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad made misleading and unsubstantiated savings claims.asa.org.uk—
Metamind AI Ltd t/a AI Persona2024-12-11In-game advertisingAn in-game ad was socially irresponsible, caused offense by harmfully stereotyping women as sexual objects and portrayed someone who seemed to be under-18 in a sexual way.asa.org.uk—
Guangzhou Shimo Culture Media Co Ltd2024-12-11In-game (apps)An in-game ad was irresponsibly targeted, socially irresponsible and caused serious offense by featuring a harmful stereotype by objectifying and sexualising women.asa.org.uk—
Bodystreet Franchise (UK) Ltd2024-12-04Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad for a fitness centre made misleading claims that a 20-minute session per week was equivalent to three one-hour sessions at a regular gym.asa.org.uk—
Churchill Retirement Living Ltd2024-12-04National newspaper (paid ad)A national newspaper ad failed to include the significant conditions of a promotion, including a closing date.asa.org.uk—
Vita Studio Pte Ltd2024-12-04In-game advertisingAn in-game ad for a mobile app game discouraged essential treatment for a condition for which medical supervision should be sought and misleadingly claimed the app could help treat sleep loss problemsasa.org.uk—
Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd2024-11-27Internet (website content)A website promotion misleadingly described a promotional item as “free”, did not make clear promotional items would have to be purchased upfront before being redeemed via a cashback mechanism and omitasa.org.uk—
Wizz Air Hungary Ltd2024-11-27Website (paid ad)A paid-for Google ad for Wizz Air gave a misleading impression of their flights’ environmental impact by not making the basis of comparative claims clear or providing verifying information.asa.org.uk—
The Pure Gold Group Ltd t/a The Pure Gold Company2024-11-20Website (paid ad)Two paid-for Google ads failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.asa.org.uk—
Aurum & Argenti Ltd t/a Bullion Club, bullionclub.co.uk2024-11-20Website (paid ad)A paid-for Google ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the futuasa.org.uk—
Fern Brady2024-11-20Website (paid ad)A paid-for ad for the comedian Fern Brady, seen on the Sky News website, was likely to cause serious offence to some within the Christian faith.asa.org.uk—
Gold Warehouse Ltd t/a Gold Bank2024-11-20RadioThree radio ads, which implied that gold had investment potential, were broadcast on a non-specialist radio channel.asa.org.uk—
Gold Warehouse Ltd t/a Gold Bank2024-11-20Press other (paid ad)A press ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.asa.org.uk—
Harrington & Byrne Ltd2024-11-20Press other (paid ad)A press ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future.asa.org.uk—
Solomon Global Ltd t/a Buy Bullion2024-11-20Social media (paid ad)A paid for Facebook ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the fuasa.org.uk—
Stirling Health Ltd2024-11-20Press other (paid ad)A press ad made medicinal claims for an unauthorised product.asa.org.uk—
Cult & Boutique (Wine Management) Ltd2024-11-13Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad failed to make sufficiently clear that wine investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guasa.org.uk—
DeVosVoorzieningen BVBA t/a Qinux TitanPG2024-11-13Internet (video)A pre-roll YouTube ad made unsubstantiated claims about the features and popularity of a smart watch.asa.org.uk—
Cult Wines Ltd2024-11-13Search (paid)Two paid-for Google ads failed to make sufficiently clear that wine investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a gasa.org.uk—
Vintage Associates Fine Wine Merchants Ltd2024-11-13Social media (paid ad)Two paid for social media ads failed to make sufficiently clear that wine investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessariasa.org.uk—
Vinverum Ltd2024-11-13Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad failed to make sufficiently clear that wine investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable and also made unsubstantiated investment claims.asa.org.uk—
Great Grass MCR Ltd t/a Great Grass2024-11-13PosterA poster was socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence by featuring a harmful gender stereotype and objectifying women.asa.org.uk—
Pegasus Homes Ltd t/a Pegasus Homes2024-11-13National newspaper (paid ad)A national newspaper ad for a retirement property company failed to include the significant conditions of a promotion and misleadingly omitted information regarding the price of a service charge.asa.org.uk—
Pegasus Homes Ltd t/a Pegasus Homes2024-11-13National newspaper (paid ad)A national newspaper ad for a retirement property company failed to include the significant conditions of a promotion.asa.org.uk—
Prime Star Shop Ltd t/a Branshaws2024-11-13Press other (paid ad)A press ad made medical claims for an unlicenced product which didn’t hold the relevant compliance labels.asa.org.uk—
Supreme CBD Ltd t/a Supreme CBD2024-11-13Social media (own site)A post on Anthony Fowler’s X account made unauthorised health claims about CBD.asa.org.uk—
Eurostar International Ltd2024-11-06Social media (paid ad), Social media (own site)A paid for Instagram post and a post on Eurostar’s Facebook page exaggerated the number of tickets available at a certain price and omitted material information about the dates tickets were available asa.org.uk—
CurrencyWave Ltd t/a CurrencyWave2024-11-06Website (own site)A website for a foreign currency payments service misleadingly implied they conducted foreign exchange payments and were FCA authorised, and also used inaccurate cost comparison information.asa.org.uk—
Wickes Building Supplies Ltd t/a Wickes2024-10-30Social media (own site)An X post failed to include the significant conditions and judging criteria for a competition it was promoting.asa.org.uk—
Go Night Night (unconfirmed)2024-10-30Website (own site)A website for a sleep consultancy company misleadingly featured the logo of a professional standards body that it wasn't registered with.asa.org.uk—
The Boots Company plc2024-10-30Television, Video on demandA TV and Video on Demand (VOD) ad condoned not using sunscreen.asa.org.uk—
Just Eat.co.uk Ltd2024-10-23Email, Website (own site)A webpage and an email promotion for Just Eat didn't include all significant conditions of the promotion and caused unnecessary disappointment to participants.asa.org.uk—
Webloyalty International Ltd t/a Webloyalty, Complete Savings2024-10-23Website (own site)Three webpages on a website for a shopper reward programme failed to make clear the steps that people had to take to obtain a 'welcome reward'.asa.org.uk—
Webloyalty International Ltd t/a Webloyalty, Complete Savings2024-10-23App (paid ad)Two in-app ads and a pop-up banner ad for a shopper reward programme weren't clearly identifiable as ads and didn't make the presentation of choices clear.asa.org.uk—
Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd t/a Sainsbury's2024-10-16Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram story posted by Kayleigh Johnson linked to a product listing on Sainsbury’s website which had the effect of marketing infant formula to the general public, which is prohibited under the Casa.org.uk—
Trav Expert Ltd t/a Travelcrew2024-10-16Website (own site)Prices on a website for a retailer of flights and holidays were misleading because the advertiser did not hold evidence to show they were genuine and included all non-optional taxes, duties, fees and asa.org.uk—
W8 Tech Cyprus Ltd t/a Seeking2024-10-16Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Reddit ad for a dating website perpetuated sexist and negative gender stereotypes and was likely to cause harm and widespread offence.asa.org.uk—
Suntory Global Spirits UK Ltd2024-10-16Social media (own site)A post on Bowmore Single Malt Whisky’s Facebook page in partnership with Aston Martin linked alcohol with driving and was irresponsible.asa.org.uk—
Pall Mall Medical (Manchester) Ltd t/a Pall Mall Cosmetics2024-10-09Social media (own site)An Instagram ad was irresponsible as it trivialised the decision to undergo cosmetic surgery and linked cosmetic surgery with happiness and confidence.asa.org.uk—
British Telecommunications plc t/a BT2024-10-09Website (own site)A webpage on the BT website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases.asa.org.ukview
EE Ltd t/a EE2024-10-09Website (own site)A webpage on the EE website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases.asa.org.ukview
Ashlen Inc2024-10-09Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad misleadingly stated that a hair pin collection was being withdrawn and failed to include an end date for a promotion.asa.org.uk—
Fanfinders Ltd2024-10-09Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad promoting a free baby box featured an image which didn’t accurately represent what customers received.asa.org.uk—
Telefonica UK Ltd t/a O22024-10-09Website (own site)A webpage on the O2 website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increase.asa.org.ukview
Kentesh Ltd2024-10-09Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad misleadingly stated that a clothing collection was being withdrawn and failed to include an end date for a promotion.asa.org.uk—
Kerry Foods Ltd2024-10-09Video on demandA video on demand ad for a HFSS product featuring the licensed character Garfield and a promotion broke the rules by being directly targeted at pre-school or primary school children.asa.org.uk—
TalkTalk Telecom Ltd t/a TalkTalk2024-10-09Website (own site)A webpage on the TalkTalk website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases.asa.org.ukview
Moderny Inc t/a Moderny.co2024-10-09Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad misleadingly stated that a home-wear collection was being withdrawn and failed to include an end date for a promotion.asa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a Goodysee2024-10-09Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad misleadingly stated that a clothing collection was being withdrawn and failed to include an end date for a promotion.asa.org.uk—
Plusnet plc2024-10-09Website (own site)A webpage on the Plusnet plc website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases.asa.org.ukview
PlymGlow Ltd2024-10-09CircularA circular for a tanning salon discouraged essential treatment for conditions for which medical supervision should be sought and irresponsibly claimed that health benefits could be obtained from sunbeasa.org.uk—
Virgin Media Ltd2024-10-09Website (own site)A webpage on the Virgin Media website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases.asa.org.ukview
Sunspot Tours Ltd t/a Mercury Holidays2024-10-02National newspaper (ad feature)A national press ad for a package holiday misleadingly described a holiday as including a "free" week.asa.org.uk—
The BLAC Awards (UK) C.I.C t/a The BLAC Awards2024-10-02Social media (own site)Four Facebook posts on The BLAC Awards page, and a website for The BLAC Awards misleadingly implied that they had an official partnership with the Royal Air Force.asa.org.uk—
Wenzhou Xinyu Maoyi Youxian Gongsi t/a XINYU TRADE2024-09-25Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Two Instagram stories on Mel Lloyd’s account featuring affiliate links weren't obviously identifiable as ads.asa.org.uk—
THG Beauty Ltd t/a Look Fantastic2024-09-25Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram story highlight on Erim Kaur’s account wasn’t obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
SpinX Games Ltd2024-09-25Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for TikTok ads for a social casino game app misleadingly implied that people could win real-world money or tangible prizes through gameplay when this wasn’t the case.asa.org.uk—
Shop TJC Ltd t/a The Jewellery Channel2024-09-25TelevisionA teleshopping ad promoted a product that was a medical treatment for humans and also made medical claims for an unlicensed device.asa.org.uk—
Reiss Ltd2024-09-25Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram reel on Lydia Millen’s account posted together with Instagram stories featuring affiliate links to the products shown in the reel weren’t obviously identifiable as ads.asa.org.uk—
Not Guilty Food Co Ltd t/a The Skinny Food Co2024-09-25Social media (own site)A Facebook ad made "low calorie" nutrition claim and comparing calorie content with a competitor broke the ad rules by making unsubstantiated nutrition claims and failing to meet the required conditioasa.org.uk—
Nike Retail BV2024-09-25Social media (paid ad)A paid-for X ad for The Sole Supplier, featuring Nike trainers, was misleading as most people would reasonably assume that the trainers were for adults when, in fact, they were intended for older chilasa.org.uk—
Moreham Wood Ltd t/a Oak Furniture Superstore2024-09-25InternetA website for Oak Furniture Superstore failed to make the basis of a promotion clear and made misleading and unsubstantiated savings claims.asa.org.uk—
Mobee Co Ltd t/a Ignite Classic Slots2024-09-25Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for TikTok ads for a social casino game app misleadingly implied that people could win real-world money or tangible prizes through gameplay when this wasn’t the case.asa.org.uk—
Zeroo Gravity Games LLC t/a Cash Tornado2024-09-25Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for TikTok ads for a social casino game app misleadingly implied that people could win real-world money or tangible prizes through gameplay when this wasn’t the case.asa.org.uk—
Adidas UK Ltd2024-09-25Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram story on Tanya Burr’s account featuring affiliate links wasn’t obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
DAMM 1876 LTD2024-09-25Social media (own site)Two Instagram reels on alcohol brand Estrella Damm’s own account linked alcohol with activities or locations in which drinking would be unsafe or unwise.asa.org.uk—
Dataverse Co. Limited t/a Gamehaus2024-09-25Social media (paid ad)Three paid-for TikTok ads for a social casino game app misleadingly implied that people could win real-world money or tangible prizes through gameplay when this wasn’t the case.asa.org.uk—
Guang Zhou Shi Chen Ming Ke Ji You Xian Gong Si t/a MENGCOOL2024-09-25Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Two Instagram stories on Jess Sheppard’s account featuring affiliate links weren't obviously identifiable as ads.asa.org.uk—
Huel Ltd2024-09-25Social media (own site)An Instagram video made non-permitted comparative nutrition claims and compared foods that weren’t in the same category. It also made misleading pricing claims and contained general health claims thatasa.org.uk—
Huuuge Global Limited t/a Billionaire Casino2024-09-25Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for TikTok ads for a social casino game app misleadingly implied that people could win real-world money or tangible prizes through gameplay when this wasn’t the case.asa.org.uk—
Sky UK Ltd t/a NOW2024-09-25Internet (website content)A website for Now TV was misleading as it didn’t make it sufficiently clear that free trials, which were automatically added to the basket, would auto-renew at a fee unless cancelled.asa.org.ukview
Mazda Motors UK Ltd2024-09-25Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for the Mazda2 Hybrid car gave a misleading impression of the vehicle’s environment impact and made absolute claims that couldn’t be evidenced.asa.org.uk—
Vape Life Ltd t/a CBDLife UK2024-09-18Internet (website content)A website made misleading claims that CBD was suitable for consumption by children and incorrectly stated that the recommended maximum consumption of CBD per day for adults was 70 mg.asa.org.uk—
Vodafone Ltd2024-09-18Social media (paid ad), TelevisionA TV ad, paid-for X ad and website for Vodafone made unsubstantiated claims that their broadband services provided a nearly identical performance to BT's services, and that millions of BT broadband cuasa.org.ukview
Excite For Life Ltd2024-09-18Internet (website content)A website made misleading claims that CBD was suitable for consumption by children, incorrectly stated that the recommended maximum consumption of CBD per day for adults was 70 mg and made general heaasa.org.uk—
NothingFishy Ltd2024-09-18Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad made claims that a food supplement could treat symptoms of Covid-19 and also made unauthorised specific health claims.asa.org.uk—
Sterling Wholesale Ltd t/a Moncrief2024-09-18Internet (website content)A website made misleading claims that all of its products were handmade in Italy, and that they had frequently been featured in top international fashion magazines.asa.org.uk—
Femgroup Ltd t/a Feminapause2024-09-11Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad made claims that a supplement could treat symptoms of the menopause and misleadingly implied that the supplement had been approved by the Food Standards Agency.asa.org.uk—
Nasty Gal Ltd2024-09-11Social media (own site)A promotion on the Nasty Gal Instagram page failed to clearly publish the winner of a competition.asa.org.uk—
Mayborn (UK) Ltd t/a Tommee Tippee2024-09-04Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad for a device for removing air particles from milk made unsubstantiated efficacy claims for treating colic and its symptoms.asa.org.uk—
247 Home Furnishings Ltd t/a 247Blinds2024-09-04Internet (website content)A website ad which made references to blindness were likely to cause serious or widespread offence on the grounds of disability.asa.org.uk—
Sports Supplements Ltd t/a Bulk2024-09-04EmailAn email contained a promotion which wasn't capable of being used and so wasn't administered fairly.asa.org.uk—
Hike Future Ltd t/a Hike Footwear2024-08-28Social media (paid ad)Three paid-for Facebook ads made misleading claims about a money back guarantee, made medical claims for unlicensed products and featured testimonials that weren’t genuine.asa.org.uk—
CPD Regulatory Office2024-08-28InternetA website made misleading claims about being affiliated with government bodies, misleading claims to have accreditation providers that met government-approved standards, and misleadingly using organisasa.org.uk—
Just Eat.co.uk Ltd t/a Just-Eat.co.uk2024-08-21InternetA paid-for Facebook ad for Just Eat failed to use appropriate targeting to ensure an ad featuring HFSS products wasn't directed at under 16s.asa.org.uk—
Valterous Ltd t/a Therapie Clinic2024-08-21InternetA website and Instagram ad made misleading and unsubstantiated saving claims.asa.org.uk—
Quintain Living Ltd2024-08-14Internet (website content)A website made misleading claims about the average saving customers would make on energy costs and claimed that a package included free Wi-Fi and work from home areas, when these were just included inasa.org.uk—
The Edinburgh Herbal Dispensary Ltd t/a Napiers Edinburgh2024-08-14Social media (paid ad)Five TikTok ads made medicinal claims for an unlicenced product.asa.org.uk—
ZOE Ltd2024-08-14Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for Zoe featuring a testimonial from Steven Bartlett misleadingly omitted that he was an investor in the company.asa.org.uk—
Huel Ltd2024-08-14Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads for Huel featuring a testimonial from Steven Bartlett misleadingly omitted that he was one of the company's directors.asa.org.uk—
Flow Neuroscience AB t/a Flow2024-08-07InternetAn ad on Gemma Collins' Instagram account discouraged treatment for depression, a condition for which medical supervision should be sought.asa.org.uk—
Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd t/a Virgin Atlantic2024-08-07RadioA radio ad for Virgin Atlantic included the unqualified claim "100% sustainable aviation fuel", which gave a misleading impression of the fuel's environmental impact.asa.org.ukview
MedTech Global LLP t/a Orthoback2024-08-07InternetA website and Facebook ad made unsubstantiated savings claims, made misleading claims about the advertiser's money-back guarantee and returns policy, and made medical claims for an unlicenced product asa.org.uk—
Debenhams Brands Ltd t/a Debenhams2024-07-31Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for Debenhams made misleading and unsubstantiated savings claimsasa.org.uk—
WHG (International) Ltd t/a William Hill Online2024-07-31Internet (sponsored search)A paid-for search ad and a website for William Hill advertising a new customer welcome bonus misled consumers by failing to include all significant conditions of the promotion and by not positioning tasa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a Cishx GB2024-07-31Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad which claimed that underwear could treat prostate issues made medical claims for a device that didn’t hold the applicable conformity marking and was not registered with the MHRA.asa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a Cheerchest Cove2024-07-31Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for prostate cream made medicinal claims for an unlicensed product.asa.org.uk—
Gelcard Ltd t/a Water22024-07-31EmailAn email advertising a water filter caused unjustified fear or distress on the basis of misleading claims.asa.org.uk—
MYA Clinics Ltd t/a MYA Cosmetic Surgery2024-07-31Website (paid ad)Two display ads for cosmetic surgery shown on the Quizlet website were inappropriately targeted.asa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a Gauge B-Ready Locks, Guardian Tech Locksmith Cranleigh, ApexCraft Locksmith Frimley and Alex the Locksmith West Molesey2024-07-31Internet (website content)Four websites for locksmiths misleadingly stated that they were a local business and that they had physical premises in certain locations when this wasn’t the case.asa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a Mendio Life2024-07-31Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad which claimed that an acupressure clip could treat prostate issues made medical claims for a device that didn’t hold the applicable conformity marking and was not registered with thasa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a Nultqh GB2024-07-31Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad for a prostate patch made medicinal claims for an unlicensed product.asa.org.uk—
Sky UK Ltd t/a NOW2024-07-31Website (ad feature)A website ad for NOW TV omitted material information about the inclusion of ads in basic streaming membership plans.asa.org.ukview
The Benenden Healthcare Society Ltd2024-07-24Television, RadioA TV and Radio ad for private health insurance mislead consumers by omitting material information about a healthcare plan, including significant exclusions relating to treatment options.asa.org.uk—
Well Gummies2024-07-24InternetTwo Facebook ads and a TikTok ad made claims that a supplement could treat multiple conditions including anxiety, made unauthorised specific and general health claims, and advertised a products contaiasa.org.uk—
Wild Cosmetics Ltd2024-07-24InternetA pre-roll YouTube ad for Wild deodorant misleadingly implied that there was a link between competing deodorant products and breast cancer.asa.org.uk—
Innocent Health Ltd t/a Novomins Nutrition2024-07-24InternetA paid-for Facebook ad made claims that a supplement could treat anxiety and also made unauthorised specific health claims and general health claims.asa.org.uk—
Ejec Ventures LLC t/a Auri Nutrition2024-07-24InternetA paid-for Facebook ad made claims that a supplement could eliminate stress and also made unauthorised specific health claims and general health claims.asa.org.uk—
Nowt Ventures Ltd t/a Feel Güd2024-07-24Social media (paid ad)Four paid-for Facebook ads made claims that a supplement could treat anxiety and also made unauthorised specific health claims and general health claims.asa.org.uk—
Nutriburst Ltd t/a Nutriburst Vitamins2024-07-24InternetA paid-for Facebook ad made claims that a supplement could treat anxiety and also made unauthorised specific health claims and general health claims.asa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a Vitality Greens2024-07-24Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads made claims that a supplement could treat anxiety, made unauthorised specific and general health claims, and advertised a products containing unauthorised novel foods.asa.org.uk—
Feel Holdings Ltd t/a Feel2024-07-17InternetA paid-for Facebook ad claimed that a supplement could cure symptoms of the menopause.asa.org.uk—
GB Sports Advisors Ltd t/a Geoff Banks Online2024-07-17Internet (on own site)A website ad offering a free bet failed to include all the significant conditions of the promotion.asa.org.uk—
Simmer Ltd2024-07-17Internet (display)A Facebook post and paid-for TikTok ad misleadingly implied that an endorsement was genuine and related to their product.asa.org.uk—
Happy Koala LLC t/a MenoDaily2024-07-17InternetA paid-for Facebook ad claimed that a supplement could cure symptoms of the menopause and also made health claims that referred to a rate or amount of weight loss.asa.org.uk—
Hurtigruten UK Ltd t/a HX Hurtigruten Expeditions2024-07-17InternetA paid-for ad in a digital newspaper for a cruise made misleading and unsubstantiated claims about the environmental impact of the expedition and failed to make the basis of these environmental claimsasa.org.uk—
Wessex Water Services Ltd2024-07-10TelevisionA TV ad for Wessex Water did not adequately qualify the environmental claims made in the ad and omitted material information about the company’s environmental impact.asa.org.uk—
Electronic Arts Ltd t/a EA2024-07-10Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a mobile app game did not make it sufficiently clear that the game contained loot boxes.asa.org.uk—
Mommy n Toys2024-07-10—A paid-for website ad was socially irresponsible as it encouraged the unsafe practice of using an anti-roll pillow for newborn babies.asa.org.uk—
London Luton Airport Ltd t/a Luton Rising2024-07-10—A magazine ad and a poster for Luton Rising did not adequately qualify the claims made in the ad and omitted material information about the environmental impact of London Luton Airport’s expansion.asa.org.uk—
The Clean Supps LLC t/a Inno Supps2024-07-03Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a weight-loss supplement made unauthorised health claims, made claims that people could lose fat from specific parts of the body and referred to a rate or amount of weight lasa.org.uk—
Aspire Nutrition2024-07-03Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad made claims that a supplement could help to prevent, treat or cure autism.asa.org.uk—
Happy Koala LLC t/a Happy Mammoth2024-07-03Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a weight-loss supplement made unauthorised health claims, made claims that people could lose fat from specific parts of the body and referred to a rate or amount of weight lasa.org.uk—
Mitchells & Butlers Leisure Retail Ltd t/a Harvester2024-07-03—A website promotion for the Harvester app misleadingly omitted material information about the significant limitations and qualifications of the promotionasa.org.uk—
Spectrum Awakening2024-07-03Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad made claims that a supplement could help to prevent, treat or cure developmental language disorder, autism and ADHD.asa.org.uk—
The Big Table Group Ltd t/a Las Iguanas2024-07-03Social media (own site)A TikTok ad encouraged excessive or irresponsible consumption of alcohol, and featured someone under the age of 25 playing a significant role which is prohibited by our strict alcohol rules.asa.org.uk—
The Drop Supplements Ltd t/a Drop2024-07-03Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a supplement made claims that it could prevent, treat or cure stress, anxiety and ADHD and made unauthorised specific health claims.asa.org.uk—
air up GmbH2024-07-03Internet (video)A YouTube ad featuring public urination condoned anti-social and potentially unlawful behaviour.asa.org.uk—
Rejuvit Labs, LLC2024-06-26Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads claimed that a supplement could cure symptoms of the menopause.asa.org.uk—
Apollo Future Technology Ltd2024-06-26Website (own site)A webpage for an affiliate programme for vaping products broke the rules by indirectly promoting unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.asa.org.uk—
Lyma Life Ltd2024-06-26Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad for an at home beauty device misleadingly claimed that it was the ‘world’s most powerful home beauty device’ and that it was a hundred times more effective and powerful than coasa.org.uk—
Femtech Healthcare Ltd t/a KeyForHer2024-06-26Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad claimed that a supplement could cure symptoms of the menopause and also made unauthorised general health claims.asa.org.uk—
Magflo Ltd t/a JAC Vapour2024-06-26Website (own site)A webpage for an affiliate programme for vaping products broke the rules by indirectly promoting unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.asa.org.uk—
Pixus Online Ltd t/a Juicemate2024-06-26—A webpage for an affiliate programme for vaping products broke the rules by indirectly promoting unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.asa.org.uk—
Nutritional Sciences Ltd t/a Physical Nutrition2024-06-19—Nutritional Sciences Ltd: An ad made unauthorised health claims, implied that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure human disease and made misleading claims regarding an alleged testimonial fasa.org.uk—
BetterMe Ltd2024-06-19Social media (paid ad)A paid-for TikTok ad misleadingly represented and exaggerated the physique that could be obtained by using an exercise programme.asa.org.uk—
Fussy Ltd2024-06-19—Fussy Ltd: A LinkedIn and Instagram ad for Fussy deodorant discredited and denigrated a competitor's brand and products.asa.org.uk—
Online Classifieds AG t/a PURE2024-06-12—Two posters for the PURE Dating App, seen in March 2024: a. The poster depicted four images of cartoon style heads, next to text that stated, “IT’S A GOOD DAY TO GET SOME HEAD” and “ON PURE DATING asa.org.uk—
Portable Multimedia Ltd2024-06-05—A website made misleading and exaggerated claims about the performance of three advertised dash cams.asa.org.uk—
iVape London Ltd2024-06-05EmailAn email broke the rules by directly promoting to consumers unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.asa.org.uk—
Future Farm Plant-Based Food UK Ltd t/a Future Farm2024-05-29PackagingThe product packaging for a Future Farm Future Burger, seen on 9 February 2024, featured a promotion. Text on the front of the packaging stated, “WIN £1000 BUY ME AND SCAN TO ENTER *T&C’S APPLY”. A QRasa.org.uk—
Avensure Ltd t/a Employment Law Advice Bureau2024-05-22—A direct mailing to a business was not obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
We Are TALA Ltd2024-05-22—Two Instagram reels and four TikToks on influencer Grace Beverly's accounts were not obviously identifiable as ads.asa.org.uk—
Pink Self Storage Ltd2024-05-22—A website ad made misleading claims about price and hidden fees.asa.org.uk—
AHK Designs Ltd t/a Victoriaplum.com2024-05-22—A website, Instragram account and X account for Victoria Plum made misleaing claims about the longevity of the brand, its customer service reviews and its total number of customers served.asa.org.uk—
Kingsland Drinks Ltd t/a Kingsland Wines & Spirits2024-05-22—A label on a bottle mislead consumers by failing to disclose the significant conditions of a competition.asa.org.uk—
Prettylittlething.com Ltd t/a Prettylittlething.com2024-05-15Social media (own site)A series of tweets misleadingly implied that a promotion included all product lines, failed to include the closing dates or times of the promotion and misleadingly implied that further discounts wouldasa.org.uk—
Tonic Nutrition Ltd t/a Tonic Health2024-05-15Website (own site), Social media (own site)A website and Instagram reel made unauthorised nutrition and comparative nutrition claims, and discredited competitors' products.asa.org.uk—
Festival Free Bets2024-05-15Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A post on Astrid Wett’s X (formerly Twitter) page, advertising a company that collated betting offers, broke gambling ad rules by featuring someone under 25.asa.org.uk—
Hangcure Ltd t/a Hangcure2024-05-15Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A TikTok ad for a hangover cure claimed that a food supplement could treat human disease.asa.org.uk—
ProgressPlay Ltd2024-05-08Internet (website content)A website advertising a gambling promotion failed to disclose significant conditions of entry.asa.org.uk—
Tecnología Sostenible y Responsable SL (TSR) t/a Sustainable and Responsible Technology SL2024-05-08Social media (paid ad)A paid-for X ad made misleading claims about the effect of blue light on eyes.asa.org.uk—
Lark Holdings Limited2024-05-01Website (own site)A website misleadingly claimed that a programme could permanently eliminate an array of mental health disorders and discouraged essential treatment for conditions for which medical supervision should asa.org.uk—
Whitbread Group plc t/a Premier Inn, Beefeater2024-05-01Search (paid)A paid-for search ad made misleading claims about the price of hotel rooms.asa.org.uk—
Independent British Vape Trade Association t/a IBVTA2024-05-01National newspaper (ad feature)A newspaper advertorial indirectly promoted unlicenced e-cigarettes.asa.org.uk—
Dr Bunny Aesthetics2024-04-24Internet (website content)An online listing for a cosmetic surgery practitioner advertised prescription-only medicines and misleadingly implied a doctor or someone with a general medical qualification ran the service.asa.org.uk—
GKOnlineCo Pty Ltd t/a Pups Den, Official Aida Store2024-04-24Internet (website content)A paid-for social media ad made medicinal claims about an unlicenced product.asa.org.uk—
infirst Ltd t/a Flarin2024-04-17TelevisionA TV ad misleadingly implied that Flarin was better for treating joint pain than other ibuprofen products.asa.org.uk—
Hismile Pty Ltd2024-04-03Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for TikTok ads made misleading claims about the range of flavours produced and sold by the advertiser.asa.org.uk—
John Mills Ltd t/a JML Direct2024-04-03TelevisionA TV ad featured a testimonial which misleadingly implied a heated drying pod could prevent condensation form forming.asa.org.uk—
Mous Products Ltd2024-04-03TelevisionA TV ad made misleading claims about the efficacy of a range of phone cases.asa.org.uk—
Nationwide Building Society t/a Nationwide2024-04-03Press general, Television, RadioTV, radio and press ads for Nationwide were misleading as consumers were likely to understand that the building society had made a long-term decision not to close their branches and that they had not asa.org.uk—
Not Guilty Food Co Ltd t/a The Skinny Food Co2024-04-03Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram Reel on Katie Price’s account was not obviously recognisable as an ad, irresponsibly promoted a diet that fell below 800 calories a day, and made weight loss claims for the products shownasa.org.uk—
Sparks Information PTE Ltd t/a Hunting Sniper2024-04-03Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for Hunting Sniper, a mobile app game, featured realistic footage of harm to animals, which was likely to cause widespread offence and unjustified distress.asa.org.uk—
Top Games Inc2024-04-03Social media (paid ad)A paid-for X ad for the game Evony: The King’s Return featured gameplay that was not representative of the actual game.asa.org.uk—
Vytaliving Ltd2024-03-27Press generalA press ad for nutritional tablets claimed a food could treat, prevent or cure human disease, featured claims that were not authorised on the GB NHC Register, and made misleading claims around savingsasa.org.uk—
John Mills Ltd t/a JML Direct2024-03-27TelevisionA TV ad for a cleaning tool presented gender stereotypes in a way that was likely to cause harm.asa.org.uk—
Easigrass (Distribution) Ltd2024-03-27Website (own site), Social media (own site)A Facebook post and website for artificial grass made misleading claims about recyclability, and misleadingly implied the product was eco friendly.asa.org.uk—
Miniclip (UK) Ltd2024-03-20Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for an online game omitted material information about the inclusion of loot boxes.asa.org.uk—
Worldwide Trademarks sro t/a Worldwide Trademarks2024-03-20Direct mailA direct mailing was not obviously identifiable as an ad, and misleadingly had the appearance of an invoice.asa.org.uk—
Jagex Ltd2024-03-20Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for online game RuneScape omitted material information about the inclusion of loot boxes.asa.org.uk—
Lindar Media Ltd t/a MRQ.com2024-03-20Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for gaming website MrQ.com featured cartoon imagery that was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.asa.org.uk—
MNG-Mango UK Ltd2024-03-20App (own claim)A product listing for a sweater featured a model who appeared to be unhealthily thin.asa.org.uk—
Aldi Stores Ltd t/a Aldi2024-03-20National pressA wrap around national press ad made misleading comparative claims which could not be verified, as well as a misleading claim about prices compared to last year.asa.org.uk—
Electronic Arts Ltd t/a EA2024-03-20Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads for Golf Clash, a mobile app game, omitted material information about the inclusion of loot boxes.asa.org.uk—
LeoVegas Gaming plc t/a BetUK2024-03-13RadioA radio ad for BetUK featuring Adebayo Akinfenwa was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.asa.org.uk—
Global Brands Ltd2024-03-13Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A TikTok post on Danielle Walsh’s account irresponsibly encouraged excessive drinking and wasn’t obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
6G Internet Ltd t/a 6Gi2024-03-06LeafletA leaflet for a home broadband provider made misleading claims about providing full fibre broadband.asa.org.uk—
Banquist Ltd t/a Banquist, Winedrops2024-03-06Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a wine retailer irresponsibly encouraged drinking unwisely.asa.org.uk—
Volkswagen Group United Kingdom Ltd t/a Audi2024-03-06VODA Video on Demand ad for an electric car featured misleading claims about charging time and mileage.asa.org.uk—
Vir Health Ltd t/a Numan2024-03-06TelevisionA TV ad for a hair loss treatment guaranteed the efficacy of the product, breaking the Code.asa.org.uk—
Simba Sleep Ltd2024-03-06Internet (website content)A website featured misleading claims around reference prices and associated savings.asa.org.ukview
OneCompress2024-03-06Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads for bamboo gloves and socks made medical claims for unlicensed products.asa.org.uk—
BPerfect Ltd2024-03-06Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A TikTok video on Stephanie Vavron’s account was not obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
Space NK Ltd t/a Space.NK2024-02-28Social media (own site)A competition via an Instagram post did not award a prize in accordance with change, was not administered fairly and omitted significant conditions.asa.org.uk—
Strafe Esports Ltd t/a LevelTap2024-02-28Social media (paid ad)A paid-for ad on Facebook linked alcohol with an activity where drinking would be unsafe or unwise, and was irresponsible.asa.org.uk—
Brown-Forman Beverages Europe Ltd t/a Jack Daniel's2024-02-28PosterA poster irresponsibly implied that drinking alcohol could overcome boredom and promoted adopting unwise drinking styles.asa.org.uk—
Capital Credit Union Ltd2024-02-28Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta post irresponsibly encouraged consumers to spend more than they could afford by taking out a loan to fund Christmas spending.asa.org.uk—
Lenovo Technology (UK) Ltd2024-02-28EmailAn email contained the misleading claim “Get 10% off any product”.asa.org.uk—
Pennine Community Credit Union Ltd t/a PCCU2024-02-28Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta post irresponsibly encouraged consumers to spend more than they could afford by taking out a loan to fund Christmas spending.asa.org.uk—
Rebecca Louise t/a rebeccalouise952024-02-21PosterA poster for a model’s OnlyFans account was inappropriately targeted and likely to cause widespread offence.asa.org.uk—
Happyo2024-02-21Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a behaviour programme aimed at those with ADHD made medical claims without being registered with the MHRA and discouraged people from seeking essential treatment for a condiasa.org.uk—
GMRD Apps Ltd t/a Impulse Brain Training2024-02-21Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a puzzle game app made medical claims without being registered with the MHRA and discouraged people from seeking essential treatment for ADHD.asa.org.uk—
Supreme CBD Ltd t/a Supreme CBD2024-02-14Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Four posts on X (formerly Twitter) were not obviously identifiable as ads, and claimed that a food could treat insomnia and anxiety.asa.org.uk—
BMW (UK) Ltd2024-02-07Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad misleadingly represented a vehicle’s environmental impact.asa.org.uk—
MG Motor UK Ltd2024-02-07Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad misleadingly represented a vehicle’s environmental impact.asa.org.uk—
Greater London Authority2024-02-07RadioA radio ad about the ULEZ expansion misleadingly claimed that one of the most polluted places in London is inside people’s cars.asa.org.uk—
Vizor Apps Ltd2024-02-07Internet (video)A pre-roll YouTube ad for a mobile app game was likely to cause serious or widespread offence, included a gender stereotype in a way that was likely to cause harm and was socially irresponsible.asa.org.uk—
Witcombe Festival2024-02-07Social media (own site)A competition via Instagram post didn’t award the winner the promised prize or a reasonable equivalent.asa.org.uk—
BKUK Group Ltd t/a Burger King2024-02-07EmailThree emails for foods in high in fat, salt or sugar (HFSS) were directed at children through the media in which they appeared.asa.org.uk—
Brooksdale Ltd2024-01-31Social media (paid ad)Three paid-for Facebook ads for PPI tax rebates misleadingly implied they were from HMRC or an official government service, and irresponsibly took advantage of people’s concerns about the cost of liviasa.org.uk—
Churchill Retirement Living Ltd t/a Churchill Retirement Living2024-01-31Internet (website content), Social media (own site)A website and a paid-for Facebook ad made misleading claims about savings, and was irresponsible for exploiting the cost of living crisis.asa.org.uk—
LifeSafe Technologies Ltd2024-01-31Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for TikTok ads misleadingly implied a fire extinguisher was suitable for all sizes and types of fires.asa.org.uk—
Lynne McTaggart2024-01-31Email, Internet (website content)Two marketing emails and a website made misleading claims about alternative medicine treating medical conditions, and discouraged people seeking essential treatment for conditions for which medical suasa.org.uk—
Reclaim My PPI Tax Ltd t/a Reclaim My PPI Tax2024-01-31Social media (paid ad)Three paid-for Facebook ads for PPI tax rebates misleadingly implied they were from HMRC or an official government service, and irresponsibly took advantage of people’s concerns about the cost of liviasa.org.uk—
Team RH Fitness Ltd2024-01-31Social media (own site)A TikTok video did not make it clear that an advertised subscription was for a minimum term of 12 months.asa.org.uk—
May Health Tourism Services t/a MAYCLINIK2024-01-24Search (paid)A paid-for Google search ad made misleading and irresponsible claims about safety, and made references that trivialised the decision to undergo cosmetic surgery.asa.org.uk—
Medi Supplies Ltd2024-01-24Internet (website content)A website made two pricing claims that were misleading and could not be substantiated.asa.org.uk—
Grandbing Technology Co Ltd t/a On Fancy2024-01-24Internet (website content)A website for an online clothing retailer portrayed a child in a sexual way and was irresponsible.asa.org.uk—
HJ Heinz Foods UK Ltd t/a Heinz2024-01-24Packaging (promotion)A packaging promotion for ‘free days out’ omitted significant conditions.asa.org.uk—
Outsourceful Ltd t/a Outsourceful2024-01-24Email, Internet (website content)An email and website for a recruitment agency perpetuated harmful racial stereotypes and were likely to cause serious offence.asa.org.uk—
Pasifik Health Services Inc t/a Care In Turkey2024-01-24Search (paid)A paid-for Google search ad made misleading claims about ‘world-class doctors’ that could not be substantiated, and made misleading and irresponsible claims about safety.asa.org.uk—
AGA Rangemaster Ltd t/a AGA2024-01-24Internet (website content)A website that claimed a cooker had “the lowest running costs for any heat-storage cast-iron range cooker” was misleading, unverifiable and could not be substantiated.asa.org.uk—
Gamehaus Network Technology Co Ltd2024-01-24App (paid ad)An in-app ad for a mobile game featuring an incestuous relationship, suggesting a child had been sexualised and groomed by an adult and portraying a child in a sexual way was likely to cause serious aasa.org.uk—
Marble Corporation Ltd t/a The Little Ones2024-01-17Internet (website content)A product page for a pillow irresponsibly shows an infant in an unsafe sleep position associated with Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (SUDI).asa.org.uk—
FunPlus International AG t/a Funplus2024-01-17Game (mobile/app)An in-app ad for a mobile game was likely to cause serious offence by trivialising and condoning sexual assault and sexual violence.asa.org.uk—
E-Scooters 4 Less (unconfirmed) t/a E-Scooters 4 Less2024-01-17Internet (website content)A website for electric scooters, which suggested products could be ridden on UK roads despite legal restrictions, was misleading and irresponsible.asa.org.uk—
Viagogo AG2024-01-10Internet (website content)Two advertorials misleadingly omitted material information about the validity of tickets bought through viagogo.asa.org.uk—
GIRLvsCANCER2024-01-10PosterAn outdoor poster that referenced a swear word was likely to cause serious or widespread offence and was inappropriate for an untargeted medium.asa.org.uk—
Happytiger ApS2024-01-10TelevisionA TV ad for bingo featured someone who appeared to be under the age of 25.asa.org.uk—
Planet Computers Ltd2024-01-10Internet (website content)A website misleadingly stated when a smartphone would be in stock.asa.org.uk—
Zzoomm plc2024-01-10Direct mailA direct mailing misleadingly stated the savings someone could make with their broadband service.asa.org.uk—
Buzz Group Ltd2024-01-03Social media (own site)A post on Buzz Bingo’s Facebook page contained imagery that was likely to appeal strongly to under-18s.asa.org.uk—
Em Rose2024-01-03PosterA poster for an OnlyFans account was irresponsibly placed and likely to cause widespread offence.asa.org.uk—
Erdem Clinic2024-01-03Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Four posts on Millie Bracewell’s TikTok account were not obviously identifiable as ads, trivialised the decision to undergo cosmetic surgery and were directed at under-18s through the context they appasa.org.uk—
Eurostar International Ltd2024-01-03EmailA promotional email that advertised trips for £39 was misleading for not having enough tickets at that price point.asa.org.uk—
2023 (291 rulings)
AdvertiserDateMediumIssueRulingCompany page
EFL Digital Ltd t/a EFL2023-12-20—Two online calendar events for The English Football League (EFL) and Papa John’s: a. The first calendar event, seen on 21 October 2022, featured the headline “[football emoji] Papa Johns Trophy: Stasa.org.uk—
Ben's Gutters Ltd2023-12-20—Four leaflets, from Ben’s Gutters, presented in the form of a compliment slip: a. The first leaflet from Ben’s Gutters Ltd, was delivered to homes in Powys, Carmarthenshire, Kent and Warwickshire iasa.org.uk—
BrewDog plc2023-12-20—An Instagram post by Brewdog, published on 31 July 2023, featured an image of a poster, containing a childlike drawing of Earth covered in flames. Text accompanying the drawing stated “drink it for measa.org.uk—
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd2023-12-20—A prize promotion on the Cathay Pacific website www.cathaypacific.com, was seen on 4 June 2023. Text stated “We have 3,260 tickets to give away! Successful entries will be awarded one return Economy tasa.org.uk—
Charles Tyrwhitt Shirts Ltd2023-12-20—A paid-for Facebook ad for Charles Tyrwhitt, a clothing retailer, seen on 28 July 2023, featured an image of a print cotton shirt. Text on the post stated “[…] We’re proud to be a Carbon Neutral businasa.org.uk—
Coty UK Ltd t/a Coty UK Ltd2023-12-20—A paid-for Facebook ad for Rimmel London, seen on 9 September 2023, included the caption “Get ready to slay this back to school season [books emoji] [stars emoji] Get 25% off Multi-Tasker Concealer anasa.org.uk—
Equinor ASA2023-12-20—A national press ad for energy company Equinor, seen in June 2023, stated “Wind, oil, gas, carbon capture […]” and “IT’S ALL PART OF THE BROADER ENERGY PICTURE”. A footnote at the bottom of the ad staasa.org.uk—
GMG Pharmacy Ltd t/a The IV Clinic2023-12-20—The website for The IV Clinic, www.iv.ghoshmedicalgroup.com, seen 1 April 2019, featured a section on its homepage titled “IV DRIPS MENU” which listed the intravenous (IV) drips services it offered: “asa.org.uk—
Get A Drip Ltd2023-12-20—The Get A Drip website www.getadrip.co.uk, seen 7 February 2019, listed the intravenous (IV) drip services it offered on a page headed “Our Menu”: “Bolt-Ons”; “Basic Hydration”; “MultiVit Drip”; “Enerasa.org.uk—
Howe Tools Ltd2023-12-20RadioTwo radio ads for Howe Tools, a power tool supplier, heard in October on Greatest Hits Radio and Heart Radio: a. In the first radio ad, a voice-over said, “At Howe Tools, we swear by our reliabilitasa.org.uk—
Kellogg Europe Trading Ltd t/a Kellogg Company2023-12-20—The product packaging for Kellogg’s Crunchy Nut Clusters, seen on 17 July 2023, featured a promotion. Text on the back of the packaging stated “FREE ADULT TICKET” next to a triangle symbol. Below, texasa.org.uk—
Kia UK Ltd2023-12-20—A paid-for Google ad and a website for Kia, seen on 13 March 2023: a. The paid-for Google ad stated “The all-new Kia Niro – Niro EV up to 285 mile range”. b. The website www.kia.com, featured a asa.org.uk—
Mercedes-Benz UK Ltd t/a Smart Car, Mercedes Benz2023-12-20—A website and e-brochure for Mercedes Benz, seen on 1 June: a. The website https://www.mercedes-benz.co.uk/ stated “Highlights … EQC”. Below this was the text, “Introducing the EQC … All-electric rasa.org.uk—
Petfre (Gibraltar) Ltd t/a Betfred2023-12-20—An ad for Live Betfred Casino seen during the programme PrestonPlayz on The Roku Channel, an over-the-top streaming service, on 17 April 2023. The ad included a voice-over which stated, “Welcome to Beasa.org.uk—
REVIV UK Ltd t/a REVIV2023-12-20—The website for REVIV UK, www.revivme.com/london, seen 1 April 2019, stated on the main page for its London clinic “REVIV IV infusion therapies deliver hydration, vitamins, and antioxidants helping toasa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a House of Beauty2023-12-13Social media (own site)A TikTok post misleadingly and irresponsibly linked health claims to using a tanning bed, discouraged seeking essential treatment for conditions where medical supervision should be sought, and was inaasa.org.uk—
Virgin Media Ltd t/a Virgin Media2023-12-13Internet (website content)A website claiming that the provider offered "the fastest WiFi Guarantee of any major provider" was misleading.asa.org.ukview
Golden Tanning Salon Ltd t/a Golden Tanning Salon2023-12-13Social media (own site)A TikTok post linked health claims to using a tanning bed, which was misleading, irresponsible and inappropriately targeted.asa.org.uk—
Etihad Airways2023-12-06Internet (display)A paid-for Google ad gave a misleading impression of the airline’s environmental impact.asa.org.uk—
Air France-KLM2023-12-06Internet (display)A paid-for Google ad gave a misleading impression of the airline’s environmental impact.asa.org.uk—
GetAgent Ltd2023-12-06Internet (website content)A website for estate agent referrals did not make it clear that some results were marketing communications, and claimed to make ‘impartial recommendations’ which was misleading.asa.org.uk—
Deutsche Lufthansa AG t/a Lufthansa2023-12-06Internet (display)A paid-for Google ad gave a misleading impression of the airline’s environmental impact.asa.org.uk—
Polyverse Inc2023-12-06App (paid ad)An in-game mobile app ad was irresponsible, likely to cause serious and widespread offence and had been irresponsibly targeted for overly sexualising and objectifying women.asa.org.uk—
South African Foods Ltd t/a Candy Store 4 You2023-12-06Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A TikTok post on Saira Hayati’s account for sea salt made health and nutrition claims that were in breach of the rules and claimed to prevent, treat or cure human disease, which broke the rules.asa.org.uk—
Merlin Attractions Operations Ltd t/a Alton Towers Resort2023-11-29Internet (website content)A website ad for Alton Towers Theme Park’s ‘Rainy Day Guarantee’ omitted material information about how it would be invoked.asa.org.uk—
Renault UK Ltd t/a Dacia, Renault2023-11-29Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Meta ad misleading claimed that a hybrid car drove “Up to 80% electric driving in the city”, which was unclear.asa.org.uk—
Procter & Gamble UK t/a Always2023-11-29TelevisionA TV ad for Always Discreet incontinence pads did not compare the product to the most appropriate version from the leading brand, and contained on-screen text whose placement misleading implied that 9asa.org.uk—
Imiracle (HK) Ltd t/a ELFBAR2023-11-29Poster, Digital outdoorA poster ad and digital billboard ad for Elfbar vapes misleadingly omitted information about limited recycling options, mislead about the environmental benefit the products offered and misleadingly hiasa.org.uk—
Play&Date Entertainment Zone2023-11-29App (paid ad)An in-app ad was irresponsible and likely to cause serious, widespread offence for trivialising and condoning sexual violence towards women, and was targeted irresponsibly.asa.org.uk—
Kollo Health Ltd2023-11-22Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for liquid collagen claimed it could reduce wrinkles and cause thicker hair, which could not be substantiated, and made specific health claims which had not been authorised on tasa.org.uk—
ACME Vape Ltd2023-11-22Social media (own site)Two TikTok posts on the IVG TikTok account promoted unlicensed, nicotine-containing e-cigarettesasa.org.uk—
Cloud City Vapez UK Ltd2023-11-22Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A TikTok post on Harleigh Perez’s account promoted unlicensed, nicotine-containing e-cigarettes.asa.org.uk—
CrypticKits2023-11-22Social media (own site)A TikTok post and Instagram post misleadingly implied that people could buy football shirts for £1asa.org.uk—
D&A Cosmetics Ltd2023-11-22Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A TikTok post on Aimee Crowder’s account exaggerated the efficacy of a lip plumper.asa.org.uk—
Organic Burst World SA t/a Organic Burst2023-11-22Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad claimed that food supplement spirulina could treat vitamin B12 deficiency and therefore reverse the growth of grey hair, which breached the rules on claiming a food supplement casa.org.uk—
Toyota (GB) plc2023-11-22Poster, Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook post and a poster ad condoned using vehicles in a way that disregarded their impact on nature and the environment, and as such were socially irresponsible.asa.org.uk—
Uppholdings Ltd t/a CluedUpp Games2023-11-22—A website, https://www.cluedupp.com/, for CluedUpp Games, an events business, was seen on 3 June 2023. The ad contained the text “WITCHCRAFT & WIZARDRY STRATFORD UPON AVON 18TH NOVEMBER 2023 … Embark asa.org.uk—
ZING Oral Care Ltd2023-11-15Social media (paid ad), Internet (website content)A website and paid-for Facebook ad misleadingly implied that titanium dioxide-containing toothpastes are potentially harmful.asa.org.uk—
GM Unicorn Corporation Ltd2023-11-15App (paid ad)An in-game ad for a mobile app game was inappropriately targeted and was irresponsible, likely to cause serious and widespread offence and included a gender stereotype in a way that was likely to causasa.org.uk—
Norfolk Dinosaur Park Ltd t/a PrimEvil2023-11-15PosterA poster for a horror-themed Halloween event was likely to cause children fear or distress.asa.org.uk—
SpiderfarmerLED2023-11-15App (paid ad)An in-app ad irresponsibly condoned growing cannabis.asa.org.uk—
Harvey Water Softeners Ltd2023-11-15Internet (website content)A website that claimed consumers could “save up to £1100” and reduce energy bills by 30% was misleading and couldn’t be substantiated.asa.org.uk—
Studiocanal Ltd t/a Studiocanal2023-11-15VODTwo video-on-demand ads contained images and a level of jeopardy not suitable for general audiences, and was likely to cause unjustifiable fear and distress.asa.org.uk—
TMS Legal Ltd2023-11-15Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for TikTok posts were misleading, as they implied testimonials featured were from genuine customers of Vanquis Bank and Moneybarn No.1.asa.org.uk—
The Heal Air2023-11-15Internet (website content), Social media (own site)A website, Facebook post and Instagram post claimed that hyperbaric oxygen therapy could treat long COVID, which was misleading and could not be substantiated.asa.org.uk—
WHM Hair Transplant and Aesthetics t/a WHM Clinic2023-11-15Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for cosmetic surgery abroad was irresponsible for exploiting insecurities around body image, trivialised the decision to undergo cosmetic surgery and omitted information about tasa.org.uk—
Borthwick Group (Energy) Ltd2023-11-15Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad from a credit broker misleadingly suggested that it had been endorsed or approved by the BBC.asa.org.uk—
FanCraze Technologies Inc2023-11-15Social media (own site)A Tweet from Essex County Cricket Club for NFTs wasn’t obviously identifiable as a marketing communication; didn’t make it clear which cryptowallet a prospective buyer would need; didn’t make it clearasa.org.uk—
Mecca Bingo Ltd2023-11-15Social media (own site)An Instagram post featuring Baga Chipz irresponsibly suggested gambling could enhance a person’s self-image or self-esteem.asa.org.uk—
Naked Wolfe Ltd2023-11-15Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad featured a model who appeared unhealthily thin.asa.org.uk—
Nimaya Mindstation Ltd2023-11-15Internet (website content), Social media (own site)A website and Instagram post claimed that hyperbaric oxygen therapy could treat long COVID, which was misleading and could not be substantiated, and discouaraged essential treatment for conditions forasa.org.uk—
Voopoo International Inc2023-11-08Internet (video)Three TikTok posts on Chantel Surge, Charlie Morrison and Lorenx’s accounts promoted unlicensed, nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.asa.org.uk—
TJC & BLC Aesthetics Clinic & Training Academy2023-11-08Social media (own site)A Facebook post misleadingly did not make clear the nature, requirements, qualifications and possible registration details of a course, and contained the claims that the course was “Fully Accredited”,asa.org.uk—
NUMA Ltd2023-11-08Internet (website content), Social media (own site)A website and Facebook post claimed that hyperbaric oxygen therapy could treat long Covid, which was misleading and couldn’t be substantiated.asa.org.uk—
Indiralaxmi Vignesh Ltd t/a Hale Clinic2023-11-08Search (paid), Internet (website content)A website and paid-for search listing claimed that hyperbaric oxygen therapy could treat long Covid, which was misleading and couldn’t be substantiated.asa.org.uk—
Geekvape Electronic Cigarettes (UK) Ltd2023-11-08Internet (video)A TikTok post on Lucci Love’s account promoted unlicensed, nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.asa.org.uk—
Emma Matratzen GmbH t/a Emma Mattress2023-11-08Internet (website content)Two paid-for YouTube ads failed to make it clear that a mattress comparison site was owned by a mattress company.asa.org.uk—
Vaporesso2023-11-08Internet (video)Two TikTok posts on Ethan Overton and Lucky Ben’s accounts promoted unlicensed, nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.asa.org.uk—
Essential Sounds Hearing2023-11-01Internet (website content)A website for hearing aids misleadingly stated their products were invisible in the ear, did not provide a refund within the advertised thirty days and made a misleading claim about stock availabilityasa.org.uk—
Chengyi Daily Department Store t/a Shop1102829235 Store2023-11-01Website (paid ad)A paid-for ad on AliExpress was irresponsible for featuring a model that appeared unhealthily thin and made medicinal claims for an unlicensed product.asa.org.uk—
Daniels Vapes t/a danielsvapes12023-11-01Social media (paid ad)A paid-for TikTok ad promoted unlicensed nicotine-containing vapes, and TikTok breached the rules for Video Sharing Platforms regulated by statute by an including an ad for electronic cigarettes.asa.org.uk—
Dr Rani Ltd t/a Daily Chemist2023-11-01Search (paid)A paid-for search ad promoted asthma inhalers, which are prescription-only medicines, to the general public.asa.org.uk—
Petfre (Gibraltar) Ltd t/a Betfred2023-11-01Social media (own site)Three tweets for Betfred featured Anthony Joshua, who is of inherent strong appeal to under-18s.asa.org.uk—
Shenzhen Guangming District Kangshuo E-Commerce Firm t/a Health Support Store2023-11-01Website (paid ad)A paid-for ad on AliExpress was irresponsible for featuring a model that appeared unhealthily thin and made medicinal claims for an unlicensed product.asa.org.uk—
THG Nutrition Limited t/a My Protein2023-11-01Social media (own site)A TikTok post for a MyProtein promotion did not set out qualifying criteria for entry clearly and omitted significant conditions.asa.org.uk—
TheGreatEvape Ltd2023-11-01Social media (own site)A paid-for TikTok ad promoted unlicensed nicotine-containing vapes, and TikTok breached the rules for Video Sharing Platforms regulated by statute by an including an ad for electronic cigarettes.asa.org.uk—
Whaleco UK Ltd t/a Temu2023-11-01Internet (display), App (paid ad)Four display ads and an in-app ad for Temu were sexually graphic and likely to cause widespread offence; sexualised someone who was a child; sexually objectified women; and were inappropriately targetasa.org.uk—
Hurtigruten UK Ltd t/a Hurtigruten2023-10-25Internet (website content)A website for Hurtigruten, an expedition cruise company, featured a misleading savings claim.asa.org.uk—
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd t/a Royal Caribbean International2023-10-25Internet (website content)A website for Royal Caribbean Cruises misleadingly implied that a cruise would depart from Venice when that was not the case.asa.org.uk—
HMK V AG t/a Windsor Mint2023-10-18TelevisionA TV ad for Windsor Mint misleadingly implied that a commemorative coin took the form a normal 40mm coin, when this was not the case.asa.org.uk—
Codeway Dijital Hizmetler Anonim Sirketi t/a Codeway2023-10-18Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram ad misleadingly exaggerated the capabilities of an AI photo-editing app.asa.org.uk—
Nexusbird Inc t/a Motion2023-10-18Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for an AI-powered calendar made medical claims for a device that had not been registered for those claims, and discouraged essential treatment for ADHD, a condition where medicaasa.org.uk—
Imiracle (HK) Ltd t/a Elfbar2023-10-18Messaging appA post for Elf Bar on Discord directly promoted unlicensed nicotine-containing e-liquids in online media.asa.org.uk—
Repsol SA2023-10-18Internet (display)A paid-for online display ad omitted significant information about the overall impact of the business’ carbon footprint.asa.org.uk—
Shop TJC Ltd t/a TJC, The Jewellery Channel Ltd2023-10-18TelevisionA teleshopping presentation for a light machine made medical claims for a device that had not been registered for those claims.asa.org.uk—
Nissan Motor (GB) Ltd t/a Nissan Motor (GB) Ltd2023-10-18TelevisionTwo TV ads for a hybrid car didn’t not make sufficiently clear the extent to which it required petrol as a power source.asa.org.uk—
ThruDark Ltd2023-10-18Social media (own site)An Instagram post for a clothing brand was irresponsible, offensive and condoned and encouraged violence, particularly against women, as well as glamourising guns and gun violence.asa.org.uk—
Grand Clinic2023-10-11Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a cosmetic clinic in Türkiye was irresponsible for exploiting mothers’ insecurities around body image; making time limited special offers, pressuring consumers into purchasiasa.org.uk—
Rosecrab Ltd2023-10-11In-game (apps)An in-game ad for a mobile game app Love Paradise – Merge Makeover was irresponsible, offensive and harmful.asa.org.uk—
UAB Forma Perfecta t/a fi clinica2023-10-11Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a cosmetic clinic in Lithuania was irresponsible for exploiting mothers’ insecurities around body image; claiming “Guaranteed Safety”, which ignored the fact that all cosmetasa.org.uk—
Accor (UK) Ltd2023-10-11Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A TikTok post on Lydia Elise Millen’s account did not obviously identifiable as an ad for the Savoy.asa.org.uk—
Aestheal Clinic2023-10-11Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a cosmetic clinic in Türkiye was irresponsible for exploiting women’s insecurities around body image; trivialising the decision to book a surgical appointment; and misleadinasa.org.uk—
BMORvape2023-10-11Social media (own site), Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Four TikTok posts, three on BMOR’s account and one on Amelia Beavis’ account, promoted unlicensed, nicotine-containing e-cigarettes.asa.org.uk—
Dakik Saglik Medikal Turizm A.S. t/a Clincexpert Hospital2023-10-11Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook ads for a cosmetic clinic in Türkiye was irresponsible for pressuring consumers into purchasing cosmetic interventions; making the claim “Defined and strong hair in just one day”asa.org.uk—
GET DHI Hair Clinic2023-10-11Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a cosmetic clinic in Türkiye was used cartoon imagery of a man that misleadingly exaggerated the effectiveness of hair transplant procedures; referenced “99% successful resuasa.org.uk—
Hutch Games Ltd2023-10-04App (own claim)A listing for the game "F1 Clash - Car Racing Manager" on the Apple App store did not make it sufficiently clear that the game contained loot boxes.asa.org.uk—
Jaguar Land Rover Ltd2023-10-04Social media (own site)A tweet about the Range Rover Sport SV was banned for making speed and acceleration the main message of the ad.asa.org.uk—
Action First Holding Ltd t/a ToChat2023-10-04App (paid ad)Two in-game ads for a chat and dating service, seen on two apps, were inappropriately targeted.asa.org.uk—
Hutch Games Ltd2023-10-04App (own claim)A listing for the game "Rebel Racing" on the Google Play store did not make it sufficiently clear that the game contained loot boxes.asa.org.uk—
G-force2023-09-27Search (paid)A paid for ad on the Google app for a bike that did not meet legal standards was misleading and irresponsible.asa.org.uk—
The Diesel Car Company2023-09-27Internet (website content)A listing for a car had a misleading pricing quote.asa.org.uk—
MEP LLC t/a O2HyperHealth2023-09-27Internet (website content), LeafletA website and leaflet for hyperbaric oxygen therapy discouraged essential treatment for conditions for which medical supervision should be sought.asa.org.uk—
Hamilton Direct Ltd2023-09-27Internet (website content)A website that claimed pellets for fuel tanks could restore lost performance and reduce emissions was misleading.asa.org.uk—
Prettylittlething.com Ltd t/a Prettylittlething.com2023-09-27EmailAn email ad failed to administer a pricing promotion via a discount code fairly.asa.org.uk—
Erdem Clinic2023-09-27Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for cosmetic surgery abroad irresponsibly pressured consumers into undertaking cosmetic interventions, exploited insecurities around body image and misleadingly omitted informatasa.org.uk—
Aspro Atlantic Medikal Turizm Ticaret Limited Şirketi t/a AsproMED2023-09-27Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for cosmetic surgery abroad was irresponsible, trivialised the decision to undergo surgery, contained misleading claims about bariatic surgery and misleadingly omitted informatiasa.org.uk—
Relx (UK) Ltd2023-09-27Internet (display)A paid-for online display ad promoted unlicensed, nicotine containing e-cigarettes.asa.org.uk—
Ersoy Health Services Tourism Ltd t/a Clinic Haus2023-09-27Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for cosmetic surgery abroad irresponsibly implied a time-limited promotion, trivialised the decision to undergo surgery and misleadingly omitted information regarding the need fasa.org.uk—
XLMedia plc t/a freebetsdotcom2023-09-27Social media (own site)An Instagram post for freebetsdotcom was banned for featuring Mason Mount, who is under 25 years old.asa.org.uk—
Flavour Warehouse Ltd t/a Elfbar2023-09-20Internet (website content)A website advertising the Elfbar vape was banned for featuring ten promotional claims.asa.org.uk—
London and Quadrant Housing Trust2023-09-20PosterA poster for shared ownership property was not administered fairly and did not make the terms of the promotion sufficiently clear.asa.org.uk—
Maje SAS t/a Maje SAS2023-09-20Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram post featured a model who appeared unhealthy thin and was irresponsible.asa.org.uk—
Postcode Lottery Ltd t/a People's Postcode Lottery2023-09-20National pressA national press ad suggested that participating in a lottery could be a solution to financial concerns.asa.org.uk—
Alibaba.com Singapore E-commerce Private Ltd t/a Alibaba.com2023-09-20Website (paid ad)A paid-for ad on a newspaper website portrayed a child in a sexualised way and was harmful and socially irresponsible.asa.org.uk—
Celine SA2023-09-20National pressAn ad in a magazine featured a model who appeared unhealthy thin and was irresponsible.asa.org.uk—
Direct Response Marketing Group Ltd t/a Wellform2023-09-20Press general, CircularFour press ads and two circulars were banned for making unsubstantiated claims that a supplement could treat human disease, including Alzheimer’s, featuring false testimonials and increasing fear and asa.org.uk—
Global Brands Ltd2023-09-20Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A TikTok ad for alcohol on Charly Anne Collard’s account was not immediately identifiable as an ad, was not appropriately targeted, irresponsibly condoned excessive drinking and featured individuals uasa.org.uk—
ZOVOO (Shenzhen) Technology Co Ltd2023-09-13Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A TikTok post on Izzi Alice Mitchell’s account promoted nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components in non-permitted media.asa.org.uk—
Bronte Ryan t/a Birmingham Aesthetics, bee_enhanced2023-09-13Social media (own site)An Instagram post by an Aesthetic clinic breached our rules by advertising a prescription-only medicine (POM) to the public.asa.org.uk—
DFDS Seaways Ltd t/a DFDS, dfdsseaways.co.uk2023-09-13Internet (website content)A website for a ferry operator misleadingly claimed that fares were from £47, when the £47 one-way ticket was only available when booked as part of a four-person cabin.asa.org.uk—
Innofly HK Ltd2023-09-13Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A TikTok post from the account @vanillaspit promoted nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components in non-permitted media.asa.org.uk—
Just Spices GmbH2023-09-13Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Two TikTok posts on Sevda Ela’s account which promoted Just Spices were not obviously identifiable as ads.asa.org.uk—
Key Retirement Solutions Ltd t/a Key Equity Release2023-09-13TelevisionA TV ad for an equity release mortgage product exploited the financial fears of the audience and did not make the risks and suitability of the product sufficiently clear.asa.org.uk—
OrganicSupplies GB2023-09-13Internet (website content)A product listing for a B12 vitamin injection kit promoted a prescription-only medicine (POM) to the public.asa.org.uk—
The Disposable Vape Store2023-09-13Social media (own site)A TikTok post from the account @tdvsbackup promoted nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components in non-permitted media.asa.org.uk—
Tony Parker t/a Dr Tony, AbilityBack2023-09-13LeafletA leaflet for Ability Back Centres misleadingly claimed that a practitioner was a registered Chiropractor who held a general medical qualification.asa.org.uk—
Vapes-Bars Ltd2023-09-13Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Five TikTok posts seen on five influencers accounts promoted nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components in non-permitted media as they offered vapes from Vapes Bars as a prize to passers-byasa.org.uk—
The Chrysalis Effect Ltd2023-09-06—A website for a health coach provider misleadingly claimed that their recovery programme could aid in the recovery of chronic fatigue syndrome or provide full clinical recovery from it.asa.org.uk—
Viva! t/a Viva!2023-09-06—Two paid-for social media ads for Viva! were irresponsibly targeted and were likely to cause unnecessary distress and serious and widespread offence.asa.org.uk—
eSky.pl SA2023-09-06—A paid-for search ad for eSky.co.uk, which appeared under the search term “Ryanair” did not make their status as a third-party travel agency clear upfront.asa.org.uk—
AOS Trading Ltd t/a Rattan Hut2023-09-06—An email, website, and paid-for Instagram story for a garden furniture retailer misleadingly claimed that items were free despite consumers having to meet a minimum order value to use the voucher codeasa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a Noozier2023-09-06—A paid-for Facebook ad for a foetal doppler retailer misleadingly implied that the device could help detect health issues early, provided parents with reassurance that an unborn baby was healthy and dasa.org.uk—
4AIR LLC2023-08-30Search (paid)A paid-for Google ad, for 4AIR LLC misleadingly understated the environmental impact of their service.asa.org.uk—
Jo Llewellyn Craniosacral Therapist2023-08-30Social media (paid ad), Social media (own site)A paid-for Facebook ad and an Instagram post for a craniosacral therapist implied that craniosacral therapists could treat long covid without robust evidence.asa.org.uk—
JD Sports Fashion plc2023-08-30PosterA poster for JD Sports and Adidas irresponsibly portrayed unsafe driving practices.asa.org.uk—
Mitu Inc Ltd2023-08-30Internet (website content)A paid-for ad for an adult video chat app portrayed someone who seemed to be under 18 years of age in a sexual way.asa.org.uk—
Peachy Acupuncture2023-08-30Social media (paid ad), Social media (own site)An Instagram post for an Acupuncturist’s page implied that acupuncture could contribute to the treatment of long covid or symptoms of it without robust evidence and promoted prescription-only medicineasa.org.uk—
Serenity Acupuncture2023-08-30Internet (website content), Social media (own site)A paid-for Facebook ad and website for an Acupuncturist implied that acupuncture could contribute to the treatment of long covid without robust evidence.asa.org.uk—
Versus Law Ltd2023-08-30Social media (own site)A page on the Flight Delay Claim website implied that passengers of flights cancelled or delayed over three hours were guaranteed compensation and did not make clear that there were advertiser’s fees asa.org.uk—
Blackford Casks Ltd t/a Whisky Investment Partners2023-08-23Internet (website content), Social media (own site), Internet (display)An online display ad, website and two paid-for Facebook posts for a whisky cask investment company made misleading and unsubstantiated investment return claims, did not make the risks involved in whisasa.org.uk—
Au Vodka Ltd2023-08-23Social media (own site)Three Instagram posts by Au Vodka irresponsibly referred to aggressive behaviour, linked alcohol with illicit drugs and tough and daring behaviour.asa.org.uk—
Boots UK Ltd t/a boots.com2023-08-23Search (paid)Four paid-for Google ads for Boots breached our rules by promoting infant formula.asa.org.uk—
London Cask Co Ltd t/a London Cask Company2023-08-23National newspaper (paid ad), Search (paid), Internet (website content)Two national newspaper ads, a website and a paid-for Google ad for a whisky cask investment company made misleading and unsubstantiated investment return claims and did not make the risks involved in asa.org.uk—
Rebel Wine Ltd2023-08-23Social media (own site)An Instagram post advertising a CBD infused wine made non-permitted health claims.asa.org.uk—
AB InBev UK Ltd t/a Camden Town Brewery2023-08-23TelevisionA TV ad for Camden Town Brewery was of strong appeal to people under 18 years of age as it featured animated characters in a fun and engaging way that would appeal to a younger audience.asa.org.uk—
Heritage Park Estates Ltd t/a Bendochy Park2023-08-16National pressA holiday homes and Lodges estate misleadingly implied that their holiday units could be used for main residential purposes.asa.org.uk—
Hillside (UK Sports) ENC t/a bet3652023-08-16Social media (own site)A tweet published by Sky Sports Premier League’s Twitter account, promoted by bet365 broke our strict rules, by featuring Granit Xhaka who has a strong appeal to those under 18 years of age.asa.org.uk—
MH Optical Limited t/a Panoptica Opticians2023-08-16Internet (website content)A website for an opticians claimed their products could treat dyslexia.asa.org.uk—
One Source Digital Ltd2023-08-16Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for an ECO funding and government grant scheme misleadingly implied that the company was endorsed by or affiliated with the UK Government.asa.org.uk—
Sisters & Seekers Ltd t/a Sisters & Seekers2023-08-16Internet (website content)A website for a clothing brand irresponsibly glamorised smoking and featured people who appeared to be under 25 years of age.asa.org.uk—
6G Internet Ltd2023-08-16Internet (website content), LeafletA leaflet and a website for a broadband provider misleadingly implied that a sixth-generation mobile network existed and was able to be used by consumers.asa.org.uk—
Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd t/a Playstation2023-08-09Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A tweet by Ozzy Osbourne which promoted the PlayStation VR2 was not obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
FancyDrops Co2023-08-09Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook post for an online retailer of cosmetic eye products misleadingly claimed that the eye drops could change the colour of eyes.asa.org.uk—
LC International Ltd t/a Ladbrokes2023-08-09Social media (paid ad)Four promoted tweets for Ladbrokes broke our strict ‘strong appeal’ rules, by featuring prominent tennis players.asa.org.uk—
Pirate's Grog Rum Ltd2023-08-09Social media (paid ad)A paid for Facebook ad for a rum company irresponsibly implied that alcohol could overcome problems and that it had therapeutic qualities.asa.org.uk—
The Fibro Guy Ltd t/a The Fibro Guy2023-08-09Internet (website content)The website for a chronic pain and hypermobility syndrome support and coaching programme claimed that the treatments and techniques they used could treat chronic pain and various health conditions.asa.org.uk—
Kellogg Europe Trading Ltd t/a Kellogg Company2023-08-02Internet (website content)A listing for the “All-Bran Prebiotic Oaty Clusters” on Kellogg’s website made unauthorised health claims.asa.org.uk—
Booksy UK Ltd t/a Booksy2023-08-02App (own claim)Recommended venue listings on the Booksy app were not obviously identifiable as adsasa.org.uk—
Fugo Information Technology and Software LLC t/a Fugo Games2023-07-26App (paid ad)An in-app ad for a gaming app was socially irresponsible and was likely to cause serious or widespread offence as it referenced expletives.asa.org.uk—
BBC Studios Productions Ltd t/a BBC Studios2023-07-26Email, Internet (website content)Four pages on the BBC and Ticketmaster websites, and an email from Ticketmaster, misleadingly omitted that tickets for the Coronation Concert would be allocated on a first-come first-served basis and asa.org.uk—
Au Vodka Ltd2023-07-26Social media (own site)A user-generated tweet which was retweeted by Au Vodka was socially irresponsible as it linked alcohol to driving.asa.org.uk—
Age Partnership Ltd2023-07-26TelevisionA TV ad for an equity release advisor and retirement income service provider misleadingly offered financial advice which they were unauthorised to provide.asa.org.uk—
WeShop Holdings Ltd t/a WeShop2023-07-19Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Ads for a shopping app, posted to Instagram Stories, were found to be not clearly labelled as ads, with one ad also making misleading claims about the future value of shares.asa.org.uk—
Red Miracle Group t/a Domino’s Pizza2023-07-19LeafletA promotion offered in a leaflet for Domino’s Pizza was not administered fairly and was likely to have caused participants unnecessary disappointment.asa.org.uk—
Lipstick Gangster Ltd t/a The Lipstick Gangster2023-07-12Social media (own site)A post on a beauty clinic’s Facebook page promoted an unlicensed medicinal product and made misleading and unsubstantiated claims about the efficacy of a treatment.asa.org.uk—
LC International Ltd t/a Ladbrokes2023-07-12Social media (own site)Two promoted tweets for Ladbrokes broke our strict ‘strong appeal’ rules, by featuring five Premier League managers.asa.org.uk—
Jumpman Gaming Ltd t/a Lights Camera Bingo2023-07-12Internet (website content)A website for an online bingo site encouraged irresponsible gambling behaviour.asa.org.uk—
ITAE Productions Ltd t/a The Post-Mortem Live2023-07-05EmailTwo emails for a live post-mortem event were misleading and were likely to cause offence.asa.org.uk—
Gemporia Ltd2023-07-05TelevisionTwo teleshopping presentations for a jewellery retailer made misleading saving claims and price statements.asa.org.uk—
Guru Smart Holding Ltd2023-07-05App (paid ad)An in-app ad was overly sexual and irresponsibly objectified women, which was likely to cause serious and widespread offence.asa.org.uk—
LC International Ltd t/a Ladbrokes2023-07-05Social media (own site)A promoted tweet for Ladbrokes broke our strict rules, by including an image that featured Jake Paul who has a strong appeal to those under 18 years of age.asa.org.uk—
The Belvedere Clinic Ltd2023-07-05Internet (website content)The home page of a cosmetic surgery clinic website, irresponsibly put consumers under pressure to book a surgical procedure and misleadingly claimed to be one of the most successful cosmetic surgery casa.org.uk—
UK Bi-Fold Door Factory Ltd2023-07-05Internet (website content)A website for a window and door fitting company misleadingly claimed to have an official partnership with Schüco and Cortizo.asa.org.uk—
Vodafone Ltd t/a Vodafone2023-07-05National press, Television, Internet (website content), Social media (own site), RadioPages on Vodafone’s website, two national press ads, a promoted Tweet, a TV ad and a radio ad misleadingly claimed to offer “The UK’s only Phone Buy-Back Guarantee.”asa.org.ukview
Parkwood Learning Ltd t/a The Cognitive Health Coach2023-06-28Social media (own site)A Facebook post on a health coach’s page misleadingly claimed to treat the symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease.asa.org.uk—
Toyota (GB) plc2023-06-28Internet (website content)A website for Toyota misleadingly claimed its bZ4X model could reach 80% charge in around 30 minutes with a 150 kW fast-charging system when using rapid public charging.asa.org.uk—
Team RH Fitness Ltd2023-06-28Social media (own site)A post on fitness company’s Facebook page objectified women, which was likely to cause serious and widespread offence.asa.org.uk—
London School of Planning and Management Ltd2023-06-28Internet (website content)A website for a higher education institution misleadingly implied that they offered a Master of Business Administration (MBA).asa.org.uk—
Dirtea Ltd t/a Dirtea2023-06-28Social media (own site)Five Instagram posts on the Dirtea Instagram page and a paid-for Facebook ad claimed the product could prevent, treat or cure various human diseases.asa.org.uk—
Fortress Energy Solutions Ltd2023-06-28LeafletA leaflet for a voltage optimiser products retailer misleadingly claimed the product could save on energy bills.asa.org.uk—
Hyundai Motor UK Ltd2023-06-28Brochure, Internet (video), Poster (digital video)A digital billboard, YouTube video and marketing brochure advertising Hyundai’s IONIQ 5 model, misleadingly claimed that the vehicle could charge from 10% to 80% in 18 minutes using a 350 kW charger.asa.org.uk—
We Fit Any Furniture Ltd t/a We Fit Any Furniture; My Fitted Bedroom2023-06-28Internet (website content)A website for a fitted bed specialist made misleading savings claims.asa.org.uk—
BBNJ Ltd t/a Traveldecorum2023-06-21Search (paid)A paid-for search listing and a booking webpage for a travel agent made misleading price claims.asa.org.uk—
Holiday Extras Ltd t/a Purple Parking2023-06-21Website (own site)A travel website misleadingly claimed to offer free cancellations and did not include material information clearly and prominently.asa.org.uk—
John Mills Ltd t/a JML Direct2023-06-21TelevisionA TV ad for a draught seal misleadingly exaggerated the efficacy of the product.asa.org.uk—
Menar Jimmy Georgiou2023-06-21Social media (own site)A post on a beauty clinic’s Facebook page promoted prescription-only medicines to the general public.asa.org.uk—
Warehouse Fashions Online Ltd t/a Warehouse2023-06-21Website (own site)A product listing on a fashion retailer’s website irresponsibly featured a model who appeared unhealthily thin.asa.org.uk—
Serenity Rehabilitation Ltd t/a Serenity Addition Centres2023-06-21Website (own site)A website for a rehabilitation centre did not make clear that they were a referral company and implied that they owned clinics.asa.org.uk—
Shop TJC Ltd t/a The Jewellery Channel2023-06-21TelevisionA teleshopping presentation for a body contouring slimming device exaggerated the capabilities and performance of the device and made unsubstantiated claims.asa.org.uk—
Blenheim Sales & Lettings Ltd2023-06-21Social media (own site)A promotion on a letting agent’s Facebook page was not administered fairly and omitted significant information about how to claim the prize.asa.org.uk—
Anglian Water Services Ltd t/a Anglian Water2023-06-14Television, Video on demandA TV ad and video on demand (VOD) ad for a water company misleadingly omitted material information about its history of releasing sewage into the environment.asa.org.uk—
The Business Catalyst Ltd2023-06-14Website (own site)A blog post on the website for a business software provider made claims about the functionality of another software without holding adequate substantiation for those claims.asa.org.uk—
Shop TJC Ltd t/a The Jewellery Channel2023-06-14TelevisionA teleshopping presentation promoting a sphere and a pyramid clock containing the mineraloid shungite irresponsibly exploited consumer concerns and made misleading and unsubstantiated health claims.asa.org.uk—
Qatar Tourism2023-06-14Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram post on Rio Ferdinand’s account which promoted the Visit Qatar website was not obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
Petroliam Nasional Berhad t/a PETRONAS2023-06-07TelevisionA TV ad for Petronas misleadingly omitted material information about the balance of its current activities, its emissions, and the pathway to reducing them.asa.org.uk—
Novielo London t/a Novielo London2023-06-07Internet (website content), Social media (own site)An Instagram post and website for an online home retailer irresponsibly encouraged the excessive consumption of alcohol and implied that alcohol had therapeutic qualities.asa.org.uk—
Procter & Gamble2023-06-07TelevisionA TV ad for an intense pulsed light (IPL) device, misleadingly implied that their product could remove hair permanently.asa.org.uk—
Repsol SA2023-06-07Internet (display)A paid-for online display ad for Repsol, misleadingly omitted material information including how and when Repsol would achieve net zero emissions, and the role that the development of biofuels would pasa.org.uk—
Dochsa Ltd t/a Dochsa2023-06-07Internet (website content)A website for a food supplement provider implied the supplements could help prevent, treat or cure various conditions and made unauthorised health claims.asa.org.uk—
Getir UK Limited2023-06-07EmailAn email promotion from an online grocery app was unfairly administered.asa.org.uk—
Intrepid Travel Group UK Ltd2023-05-31PosterA poster for a travel company misleadingly minimised the impact of their holidays on the environment.asa.org.uk—
Litty Liquor2023-05-31Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Three posts on an alcohol brand’s Instagram account broke our rules by featuring the rapper ArrDee who is under 25 years of age and encouraged excessive and irresponsible consumption of alcohol.asa.org.uk—
Phillipson Hardwick Advisory Ltd t/a The Tax Hero2023-05-31Social media (paid ad), Internet (website content)A paid for Facebook ad and website for a tax repayment agent made claims about available refund amounts without supporting evidence, omitted significant conditions and didn’t make clear that consumersasa.org.uk—
Quickly Finance Ltd t/a Fast Track Reclaim2023-05-31Search (paid), Internet (website content)A paid for Google ad and website for a tax repayment agent made claims about available refund amounts without supporting evidence, omitted significant conditions and didn’t make clear that consumers casa.org.uk—
Total Tax Claims Ltd t/a Total Tax Refunds2023-05-31Internet (website content), Social media (own site)A paid for Facebook ad and website, for a tax repayment agent, made claims about available refund amounts without supporting evidence, omitted significant conditions and didn’t make clear that consumeasa.org.uk—
Braincare Ltd2023-05-31Email, Internet (website content), Social media (own site)An email, website and Instagram post for an online food supplement provider, made unauthorised health claims and claimed to prevent, treat, or cure human disease.asa.org.uk—
ASEA LLC2023-05-24Press generalA press ad featuring a lifestyle supplement made unauthorised health claims and claimed to prevent, treat, or cure human disease.asa.org.uk—
Person(s) Unknown t/a pr.couches-sofas-94612.com2023-05-24Internet (website content)A content discovery network ad seen on a national newspaper’s website, falsely implied that the marketer was acting for purposes outside its business and made misleading claims regarding the nature ofasa.org.uk—
Person(s) Unknown t/a Nimble2023-05-24Internet (website content)Two content discovery network ads seen on a national newspaper website, falsely implied that the marketer was acting for purposes outside its business and made misleading claims regarding the nature oasa.org.uk—
Sky UK Ltd2023-05-24TelevisionA TV ad for Sky misleadingly exaggerated the performance of Sky’s fibre broadband in its capability to provide coverage throughout a home and improve patchy Wi-Fi.asa.org.ukview
Red Gobo Inc.2023-05-24Internet (website content)A content discovery network ad seen on a national newspaper’s website, falsely implied that the marketer was acting for purposes outside its business and made misleading claims regarding the nature ofasa.org.uk—
Marshall Motor Group Ltd2023-05-24Internet (website content)A listing on a car dealer’s network website made misleading savings claims.asa.org.uk—
Redbubble Ltd2023-05-17Internet (display)A paid-for-display ad online was likely to cause serious or widespread offence through its use of language and trivialising of domestic violence, and was irresponsibly targeted.asa.org.uk—
JD Sports Fashion plc2023-05-17Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram post on KSI’s account was not obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
Eaton Gate Gaming Ltd t/a Kwiff2023-05-17Internet (website content)An ad for a gambling app on Portsmouth FC’s website was inappropriately targeted towards under-18s.asa.org.uk—
Wild Cosmetics Ltd2023-05-17Internet (video)A YouTube ad for deodorant made misleading claims about other brands preventing the release of toxins, and that aluminium salts are potentially harmful.asa.org.uk—
LIFT Aesthetics t/a lift.aesthetics2023-05-17Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Six ads on Carl Woods’ and the advertiser’s Instagram accounts advertised prescription-only medicine to the public, used a celebrity to endorse a medicine, and were not obviously identifiable as ads.asa.org.uk—
Egemed Hastaneleri2023-05-10Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad promoting cosmetic surgery in Turkey irresponsibly trivialised the decision to have cosmetic surgery, omitted material information regarding cosmetic surgery procedures abroad aasa.org.uk—
Green Fun Alliance Ltd t/a Elf Bar2023-05-10Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A TikTok post breached our rules by promoting e-cigarettes, which are not permitted to be promoted online and in some other forms of electronic media.asa.org.uk—
HQD Tech UK2023-05-10Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A TikTok post from George Baggs account promoted e-cigarettes in breach of our rules and featured someone with an e-cigarette who appeared to be under 25 years of age.asa.org.uk—
Pure Clear Minds Ltd t/a Clear Minds Hypnotherapy2023-05-10Social media (paid ad)A paid for Facebook ad for a Hypnotherapy company misleadingly implied that the advertised product would have the same impact as a gastric band and that it would have a noticeable impact on weight witasa.org.uk—
Estheday2023-05-10Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Instagram story promoting cosmetic surgery trivialised the decision to have cosmetic surgery, misleadingly exaggerated the effectiveness of the two promoted cosmetic procedures and omitted asa.org.uk—
Ultrasound London Ltd t/a London Private Ultrasound2023-05-03Internet (website content)A website for a medical ultrasound service misleadingly misrepresented the extent to which scans could provide reassurance or determine the wellbeing of an unborn baby.asa.org.uk—
Professional Antenatal Services Ltd t/a Meet Your Miracle2023-05-03Internet (website content)A website for a private pregnancy ultrasound scan studio misleadingly misrepresented the extent to which scans could provide reassurance or determine the wellbeing of an unborn baby.asa.org.uk—
Dreame Media2023-05-03Game (mobile/app)An in-app ad for a reading app was likely to cause serious or widespread offence or harm as it irresponsibly made references to physical assault and sexual acts.asa.org.uk—
Decido LLC t/a History All Day2023-05-03Internet (website content)An ad for a general interest website that appeared on Mumsnet’s website misleadingly misrepresented the extent to which scans could provide reassurance or determine the wellbeing of an unborn baby.asa.org.uk—
The Ministry of Justice2023-05-03Social media (paid ad)REPUBLISHED RULING: A paid-for Facebook ad for The Ministry of Justice was likely to cause serious offence on the grounds of race, by reinforcing negative stereotypes about black men.asa.org.uk—
First Contact Health2023-04-26LeafletA leaflet for a physiotherapist practitioner made misleading and unsubstantiated health claims.asa.org.uk—
Venus Beauty & Aesthetics2023-04-26Social media (paid ad)A post on the Facebook page of a beauty salon advertised a sclerotherapy treatment, which is a prescription-only medicine, to the public.asa.org.uk—
Victoria Anne Beauty2023-04-26Social media (own site)A post on the Facebook page of a beauty salon advertised a sclerotherapy treatment, which is a prescription-only medicine, to the public.asa.org.uk—
The Secret Diamond Academy2023-04-26Social media (own site)Two posts on the Facebook page of a beauty salon advertised training courses for sclerotherapy, without making clear the nature, requirements, qualifications and professional registration details of tasa.org.uk—
Legacy 369 Ltd2023-04-26Social media (own site)A Facebook post and a website for a health and beauty range made medicinal claims for a CBD product.asa.org.uk—
Helen Taylor Aesthetics Ltd t/a Helen Taylor Aesthetics & Wellness Clinic2023-04-26Magazine (paid ad)A magazine ad for an Aesthetic and Wellness Clinic misleadingly suggested that they could reverse ageing and extend lifespan.asa.org.uk—
Chala's Beauty Box2023-04-26Social media (own site)A Facebook reel and a Facebook post on the page of a beauty salon advertised a sclerotherapy treatment, which is a prescription-only medicine, to the public.asa.org.uk—
THG Nutrition Limited t/a My Protein2023-04-19Internet (website content)The website for a sports nutrition retailer omitted significant information relating to promotions and implied certain products were included in the promotion when this was not the case.asa.org.uk—
BV Gaming Ltd t/a betvictor2023-04-19Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for a bookmaker broke the strict gambling rules by featuring footballers Jordi Alba and Sergio Busquets who were of strong appeal to under-18s.asa.org.uk—
Balmer Lawn Garage Ltd t/a BalmerLawnMotorrad2023-04-19Press generalA press ad by a car retailer irresponsibly condoned and encouraged unsafe driving.asa.org.uk—
Brilliant Minds Ltd t/a EssayMills2023-04-19Internet (website content)A website for an essay writing service misleadingly implied that students who used their service could submit an essay they had bought as their own without risk.asa.org.uk—
British Dissertation Help2023-04-19Internet (website content)A website for an essay writing service misleadingly implied that students who used their service could submit an essay they had bought as their own without risk.asa.org.uk—
Everyday Lending Ltd t/a Everyday Loans2023-04-19TelevisionA TV ad for a loan company irresponsibly encouraged the use of a debt consolidation loan to manage existing debt without stating the risks of doing so.asa.org.uk—
Home of Dissertations2023-04-19Internet (website content)A website for an essay writing service misleadingly implied that students who used their service could submit an essay they had bought as their own without risk.asa.org.uk—
Premium Health Europe BV t/a Prima2023-04-19Internet (website content), App (paid ad)An in-app ad and a website for a food supplement manufacturer promoted weight loss products in an irresponsible manner, made unauthorised health claims and claimed to prevent, treat, or cure human disasa.org.uk—
THG Nutrition Limited t/a My Protein2023-04-19Internet (website content)The website for a sports nutrition retailer made misleading savings claims which suggested that a significant proportion of products would be discounted by 80%.asa.org.uk—
Treat Assignment Help2023-04-19Internet (website content)A website for an essay writing service misleadingly implied that students who used their service could submit an essay they had bought as their own without risk.asa.org.uk—
Universal Music Operations Ltd2023-04-19Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A TikTok post on Tasha Ghouri’s account broke the rules as it was not obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
Etihad Airways2023-04-12Social media (own site)Two Facebook ads for an airline made misleading environmental claims about the impact of flying.asa.org.uk—
Viva Doors Ltd2023-04-12Internet (website content)A website misleadingly claimed a company had been working for fifty years, when they were established in 2012.asa.org.uk—
Glowery Ltd t/a Glowday2023-04-12Internet (website content)A website for Botox treatments advertised prescription-only medicine, in breach of the rules, and was irresponsible in exploiting women’s insecurities around ageing.asa.org.uk—
Argos Ltd t/a Argos2023-04-05Website (ad feature)A Facebook post and a website landing page were not obviously identifiable as ads and misleadingly claimed that a portable heater provided a viable and cheaper alternative to gas central heating.asa.org.uk—
Kendal Nutricare Ltd t/a Kendamil2023-04-05Social media (own site), App (paid ad)A post on a formula milk manufacturer’s LinkedIn account and an in-app ad had the effect of marketing infant formula, confused between infant and follow-on formulas and made unauthorised health claimsasa.org.uk—
Uber BV2023-04-05App (paid ad), National newspaper (ad feature)REPUBLISHED RULING: A paid-for ad and a national press ad for Uber made misleading and unsubstantiated claims about the staff benefits the company provided.asa.org.uk—
Amazon Europe Core Sarl t/a Amazon.co.uk2023-04-05Internet (website content)REPUBLISHED RULING: A page on Amazon.co.uk which formed part of the checkout process, presented options relating to signing up to Amazon Prime that were likely to mislead.asa.org.uk—
Grip Media Ltd t/a Save the Student2023-04-05Internet (website content)A student advice website misleadingly exaggerated the amount of money that an individual could likely expect to make when matched betting and was inappropriately targeted.asa.org.uk—
Frank's Ice Cream Ltd2023-03-29Internet (website content)The homepage of an Ice Cream website misleading implied that their products were suitable for diabetics and made unauthorised health claims.asa.org.uk—
DFDS Seaways Ltd t/a DFDS2023-03-22Website (own site)The website for a ferry operator misleadingly claimed that trips were available from £39 when the offer was only available on certain days of the week.asa.org.uk—
Neafs UK Ltd2023-03-22Website (own site)A website for a heated cigarette sticks retailer broke the ad rules by featuring people who were, or seemed to be, under 25 years of age.asa.org.uk—
Riot Labs Ltd t/a Riot E-Liquid2023-03-15Internet (website content)Two pages on the website of a vaping retailer undermined the message that quitting tobacco was the best option for health.asa.org.uk—
Tonic Nutrition Ltd t/a Tonic Health2023-03-15Social media (own site)A TikTok post by vitamin drinks company broke the rules by implying that their food products could prevent, treat or cure human disease.asa.org.uk—
Willys Ltd t/a Willy's ACV2023-03-15Internet (website content), Social media (own site)Six ads for an apple cider vinegar made claims which were not authorised on the Great Britain nutrition and health claims register.asa.org.uk—
Butlins Skyline Ltd2023-03-08Social media (own site)A post on Butlin’s’ Facebook page for its ‘Showtime Breaks’ did not make clear that “from” prices referred to midweek, term- time breaks only and therefore excluded school holidays.asa.org.uk—
Vir Health Ltd t/a Numan2023-03-01Website (own site)A website for a company providing treatment for men’s health issues misleadingly claimed to offer a free blood test and omitted material information about the price of the test.asa.org.uk—
Nils Olav Nystog t/a AquaPure2023-03-01Social media (paid ad)Four paid for Facebook ads for a health and wellness retailer made misleading and exaggerated claims, including that using their product to remove pesticides from fruit and vegetables could increase tasa.org.uk—
A&T International Ltd t/a Bella&Toby2023-03-01Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad, a Facebook page, and a website ad, for a pet product company misleadingly claimed that their beds reduced stress or anxiety.asa.org.uk—
Deutsche Lufthansa AG t/a Lufthansa2023-03-01PosterA poster for Lufthansa made misleading claims about the airline’s environmental impact.asa.org.uk—
Fuero Games Sp zoo2023-02-22App (paid ad)Two in-game ads for a mobile app game were irresponsibly targeted and were likely to cause serious or widespread offence and likely to cause unjustifiable distress to some viewers.asa.org.uk—
Digital Results Group GmbH t/a UK Life Protection, British Life Cover Quotes, British Life Benefits2023-02-22Social media (paid ad)Three paid-for Facebook ads and a website for a life insurance provider made unsubstantiated claims and misleadingly omitted material information relating to the basis of the stated cover levels.asa.org.uk—
Swytch Technology Ltd t/a Swytch2023-02-22Internet (website content)A page on an electric bike conversion kit’s website made misleading future savings claims and misleadingly implied that discount offers were stock or time-limited.asa.org.uk—
Cyrusher Outdoors Sporting Ltd2023-02-22Internet (website content)Two product listings on an electric bike retailer’s website irresponsibly depicted the illegal use of the advertised bikes and misleadingly omitted material information.asa.org.uk—
Jiliang Gao t/a Match Tile Scenery - Matchscapes2023-02-22App (paid ad)An in-game ad for a mobile app game was socially responsible and caused serious or widespread offence by featuring a harmful gender stereotype and sexualising and objectifying women.asa.org.uk—
Huel Ltd2023-02-15Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)A Facebook ad and website page for a meal replacement retailer misleadingly implied that eating meal replacement products helped save money on food.asa.org.uk—
On That Ass International BV t/a On That Ass2023-02-15Website (own site), Social media (own site)An Instagram story post and a website for an underwear retailer misleadingly claimed to offer a free sample of the product and omitted significant conditions or information.asa.org.uk—
Gorillas Technologies UK Ltd t/a Gorillas2023-02-15Social media (paid ad), Television, Video on demandA TV, video on demand, TikTok and Instagram ad for a grocery delivery service irresponsibly featured references to drugs, sex and excessive or unhealthy drinking that were likely to cause serious or wasa.org.uk—
Charlotte Dawson2023-02-15Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Three Instagram stories on Charlotte Dawson’s account were not obviously identifiable as ads and misleadingly exaggerated the efficacy of the products being advertised.asa.org.uk—
CCHG Ltd t/a VPZ2023-02-15Website (own site)A website for an e-cigarette retailer made smoking cessation claims about their products in the absence of a relevant MHRA licence.asa.org.uk—
DeadHappy Ltd t/a DeadHappy2023-02-15Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for social media ads for a life insurance company irresponsibly caused serious and widespread offence and unjustified distress.asa.org.uk—
Juniper Technologies UK Ltd2023-02-15Internet (video)A YouTube pre-roll for a weight-loss programme broke the rules by promoting prescription-only medicines to the general public.asa.org.uk—
HomePPL Ltd2023-02-15Email, Website (own site)A website and an e-mail for a tenancy fraud prevention system made misleading comparative claims.asa.org.uk—
Gymshark Ltd2023-02-08Internet (website content)A website for a fitness brand misleadingly claimed that their express delivery option meant items would be delivered the next day.asa.org.uk—
Vodafone Ltd2023-02-08Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram post and an Instagram story on Alexandra Felstead’s account were not obviously identifiable as ads.asa.org.ukview
Hims & Hers UK Ltd2023-02-08Internet (website content)A website for a hair loss treatment retailer promoted unlicensed medicinal products and prescription-only medicines to the public.asa.org.uk—
Peak Performance Advertising LLC t/a ExpertsInMoney.Co2023-02-01Internet (display)A display ad for Experts in Money was misleading because it claimed or implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business and omitted material information.asa.org.uk—
Brightika Inc2023-02-01App (paid ad)An ad for a mobile app game was socially irresponsible and was likely to cause serious and widespread offence, as it included a gender stereotype in a way that was likely to cause harm.asa.org.uk—
Kick Ash Vapes Ltd2023-02-01Internet (website content), Social media (own site)A website and a Facebook post for an e-cigarettes retailer promoted unlicensed nicotine-containing e-liquids and their components.asa.org.uk—
MPJ Invest Ltd t/a Money Saving Tricks2023-02-01Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad and page for Emily Harding and two websites for Moneysaving tricks, misleadingly implied that the website was a comparison service that could directly provide online life insuraasa.org.uk—
Not Guilty Food Co Ltd t/a The Skinny Food Co2023-02-01Social media (own site)An Instagram post made comparative nutrition claims between foods that did not fall into the same food category, as it compared the sugar content of a product to various fruits.asa.org.uk—
Carpetright Ltd2023-01-25Internet (website content)Five banner ads and three pages on Carpetright’s website made misleading savings claims.asa.org.uk—
Tara Maynard t/a Taramays252023-01-25Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram Story on Tara Maynard’s account was not obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
Label Products BV t/a InstaHeat2023-01-25Internet (website content)A paid-for online display ad and a landing page promoting InstaHeat, a plug-in mini heater, misleadingly implied that the product could provide cheap heating and help save money.asa.org.uk—
Keilini Technology lnternational Co Ltd2023-01-25Internet (website content)A paid-for online display ad and a landing page on a website that promoted the Kelini Portable Heater, a plug-in mini heater, misleadingly implied that the product could provide cheap heating and helpasa.org.uk—
F&P GmbH2023-01-25Poster (digital static image)A digital billboard ad for an online sex community was likely to cause serious or widespread offence and was irresponsibly targeted as it was overtly sexual and displayed in a medium where children coasa.org.uk—
Ecomm Movadgency SL2023-01-25Internet (website content)A paid-for online display ad and a landing page that promoted the Heater Pro X, a plug-in mini heater, misleadingly implied that the product could provide cheap heating and help save money.asa.org.uk—
Ecom7 Ltd t/a Instacool, Heater Pro X2023-01-25Internet (website content)A paid-for online display ad and a landing page promoting Heater Pro, a plug-in mini heater, misleadingly implied that the product could provide cheap heating and help save money.asa.org.uk—
Surfshark B.V. t/a Surfshark2023-01-18VideoA paid-for ad in a YouTube video for a VPN service containing violent scenes was likely to cause unjustified distress to viewers, was irresponsibly targeted and unsuitable for delivery to a general auasa.org.uk—
Global Records SRL2023-01-18VideoAn in-stream ad on YouTube for Sickotoy’s single “2 High 2 Care” was inappropriately targeted as it was seen during a video which was of appeal to children.asa.org.uk—
Easy Consulting SL t/a Sky Breaks2023-01-11Internet (website content)A prize promotion on a travel agency’s website misleadingly omitted significant conditions.asa.org.uk—
RM Auctions Ltd2023-01-11Social media (own site)A tweet on a classic car auction company’s page depicted irresponsible driving practices that were likely to condone or encourage a breach of the rules of the Highway Code.asa.org.uk—
The Angel Clinic2023-01-11Social media (own site)Two WhatsApp broadcast messages and an Instagram Story for a Wellness Clinic promoted Ozempic injections, a prescription-only medicine that must not be advertised to the public.asa.org.uk—
Universal Music Operations Ltd2023-01-11PosterA poster promoting Demi Lovato’s new album featuring a swear word was targeted irresponsibly and was also likely to result in serious offence to Christians as it linked sexuality to the crucifix and tasa.org.uk—
DT Fitness t/a dtfitness_312023-01-11Social media (own site)A promotion in a post on a personal trainer’s Instagram page was not administered fairly.asa.org.uk—
Wild Cosmetics Ltd2023-01-11Internet (video)A pre-roll ad on YouTube for a natural deodorant and that featured a reference to masturbation was inappropriately targeted on a channel largely aimed at and featuring content that was likely to appeaasa.org.uk—
NordVPN SA t/a NordVPN, Norton 3602023-01-11RadioA Radio ad for an internet security company misleadingly claimed that the product could protect users against all malware attacks.asa.org.uk—
2022 (232 rulings)
AdvertiserDateMediumIssueRulingCompany page
FC Barcelona2022-12-21Search (paid)A Paid for Google search result for a Non-Fungible Token omitted material information regarding fees and charges on their platform, the limitations of ownership and by failing to state that NFTs are aasa.org.uk—
Associated Newspapers Ltd t/a MailOnline2022-12-21Website (own site)Articles on MailOnline that featured affiliated advertising links were not obviously identifiable as ads.asa.org.uk—
Foris DAX Global Ltd t/a Crypto.com2022-12-21Social media (paid ad)A paid for Facebook ad for a payment and cryptocurrency trading platform omitted material information regarding fees and charges on their platform and by falling to state that NFTs are an unregulated asa.org.uk—
LC International Ltd t/a Ladbrokes2022-12-21Social media (paid ad)A promoted tweet broke our strict gambling rules by including Premier League footballers who were likely to have strong appeal to those under-18 years of age.asa.org.uk—
Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd t/a Playstation Plus, playstation.com2022-12-21Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Two Twitter posts on Rio Ferdinand's account were not obviously identifiable as ads.asa.org.uk—
Turtle United NFT2022-12-21Social media (paid ad)A paid for Facebook ad for a Non-Fungible Token project misleadingly omitted material information on fees, implied there was a large, assured value and by failing to state that NFTs are an unregulatedasa.org.uk—
Emilyma Ltd t/a Saltdays2022-12-21Website (own site)A product listing on a website for an online retailer misleadingly claimed that a toothpaste was effective at whitening teeth and worked within minutes.asa.org.uk—
Happy Beds Ltd t/a Happy Beds2022-12-14Website (own site)A page on the website of an online bed retailer made misleading savings claims.asa.org.uk—
Rated People Ltd t/a RatedPeople.com2022-12-14PosterA poster for a tradesperson directory included a gender stereotype that was likely to cause harm and serious offence.asa.org.uk—
Taste Marketing Ltd2022-12-14App (own claim)An app for a discount club misleadingly claimed customers could get up to 40% off” cinema tickets.asa.org.uk—
Shop TJC Ltd2022-12-14TelevisionA teleshopping presentation made unauthorised health claims as well as prohibited claims that two Lashile Beauty food supplements could prevent, treat or cure human disease.asa.org.uk—
DrunkH Ltd2022-12-14Social media (paid ad), Internet (website content)A paid-for ad on Instagram and a website that promoted a drinking card game encouraged irresponsible or anti-social behaviour, portrayed drinking alcohol as a challenge and was inappropriately targeteasa.org.uk—
My Perfect Cosmetics Company Ltd2022-12-14Television, Internet (website content)A TV ad for an anti-aging serum and a product listing on its website included misleading delivery claims and a time-limited promotional offer.asa.org.uk—
BrewDog plc2022-12-07EmailA marketing email for a pub chain misleadingly implied that alcoholic beverages counted towards one of the five recommended daily portions of fruit and vegetables.asa.org.uk—
Euro Car Parts Ltd2022-11-30EmailTwo email ads for a car parts supplier misleadingly advertised discounts that did not represent genuine savings.asa.org.uk—
Buzzy USA Inc t/a BuzzyUSA2022-11-30Internet (video)A paid-for TikTok video for a company irresponsibly encouraged and trivialised the use of credit by those who were in financial difficulty to facilitate spending on non-essential items.asa.org.uk—
Never Fully Dressed Ltd t/a Never Fully Dressed2022-11-30Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Two Instagram posts and an Instagram story on Chessie King’s account which promoted a fashion retailer were not obviously identifiable as ads.asa.org.uk—
Motorway Online Ltd t/a Motorway2022-11-30Television, Internet (website content), RadioA TV ad, two radio ads and a website for a used car selling service misleadingly claimed customers could get up to £1,000 more than they would elsewhere if they sold their car with their service.asa.org.uk—
J Choo Ltd2022-11-30Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram story and four Instagram posts on Victoria Magrath’s account were not obviously identifiable as ads.asa.org.uk—
Digital Rewards Group Ltd t/a Kids Pass2022-11-30Internet (website content)A promotion on a family savings membership club’s website misleadingly claimed that customers could get 30% off Adult and Child Tickets with a Kids Pass.asa.org.uk—
trendybuzz2022-11-30Internet (video)A paid-for TikTok post by a company irresponsibly trivialised using credit to make purchases.asa.org.uk—
Vodafone Ltd2022-11-23National press, Internet (website content)A website banner and a press ad for a Telecommunications service provider, misleadingly implied that they were the most reliable network or the only reliable network.asa.org.ukview
Oasis Games Ltd2022-11-23Internet (video)A YouTube video ad for a mobile app game was socially irresponsible and was likely to cause serious or widespread offence, as it featured harmful gender stereotypes, objectified and sexualised women aasa.org.uk—
Valorous Sports Ltd t/a Valorous2022-11-23Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram carousel post on a Memes’ page was not obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
Come_Crafted2022-11-23Website (paid ad)A paid for Google ad, for an online retailer irresponsibly suggested the product could be used to watch women without their consent.asa.org.uk—
Crazy Maple Studio Inc2022-11-16In-game (apps)An in-game ad for a mobile app game, was socially irresponsible, irresponsibly targeted and was likely to cause serious or widespread offence by objectifying women.asa.org.uk—
Great Grass MCR Ltd t/a Great Grass2022-11-16PosterA poster for an artificial grass supplier was socially irresponsible and was likely to cause serious or widespread offence by featuring a harmful gender stereotype and objectifying and sexualising womasa.org.uk—
Rivergame Ltd2022-11-16Internet (video)Two paid-for TikTok ads for an online game, misleadingly represented and exaggerated its performance by using footage that was not representative of the product.asa.org.uk—
Quick Commerce Ltd t/a Zapp2022-11-16Poster (digital static image)An electronic poster for a grocery delivery service suggested that alcohol had therapeutic qualities and was capable of changing moods, specifically suggesting that it could accelerate feelings of relasa.org.uk—
Dental Centre Turkey UK Ltd2022-11-16Internet (website content), Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)A website, two Instagram posts and a Google ad for a dental facilitator misleadingly implied that the company was based in the UK, implied that they provided dental work and that the clinics referenceasa.org.uk—
Pelham Health Ltd2022-11-09Internet (website content)A paid-for ad on a browser news feed and a landing page on a money saving website did not make clear their commercial intent to generate leads, misled consumers by suggesting their products were in hiasa.org.uk—
ANP Medical Aesthetics2022-11-09Social media (paid ad)Two Facebook posts for an aesthetic clinic promoted hydrocortisone injections which are prescription only medicines that must not be promoted to the general public.asa.org.uk—
Perfectly Green Ltd2022-11-09Social media (own site)A tweet by an artificial grass supplier misleadingly implied that their products were recyclable and environmentally friendly.asa.org.uk—
Phox Water Ltd2022-11-02Internet (website content)A website for a water filter company was misleading because it discouraged essential treatment for health conditions for which medical supervision should be sought and made unsubstantiated claims thatasa.org.ukview
Gamehaus Network Technology Co Ltd2022-11-02App (paid ad)An in-app ad for an online drama story game was likely to cause serious offence as it objectified and sexualised a woman.asa.org.uk—
Myleene Klass2022-11-02Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram reel on Myleene Klass’ Instagram page was not obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
Next Retail Ltd2022-11-02Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Two Instagram posts and an Instagram Reel on Myleene Klass’ account were not obviously identifiable as ads.asa.org.uk—
Oriflame Cosmetics SA t/a Oriflame2022-11-02Social media (own site)Two posts on a recruitment company’s Facebook page were misleading as they did not include sufficient information to make consumers aware that the outlined incentives were based on specific earnings aasa.org.uk—
Responsible Life Limited t/a Responsible Life2022-11-02TelevisionA TV ad for an equity release provider misleadingly implied that they, or their “Complete guide to equity release”, provided independent advice and guidance on equity release.asa.org.uk—
Skechers UK2022-11-02Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram post and story on Myleene Klass’ account were not obviously identifiable as ads.asa.org.uk—
THE PACK PET Limited2022-11-02Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook post and a post on a dog food retailer’s Facebook page misleadingly implied that a plant-based diet was healthier for dogs than a meat-based diet and made misleading and unsubstantasa.org.uk—
EU Lotto Ltd t/a Lottoland2022-10-26Search (paid)A paid-for Bing search ad and two paid-for Google search ads misleadingly omitted the fact that their service offered the chance to bet on the outcome of a lottery and did not make clear and include pasa.org.uk—
Bambooi Sustainable Enterprises Ltd t/a Bambooi2022-10-26Internet (website content), Social media (own site)A Facebook ad and the website for an electric toothbrush manufacturer made misleading claims about the expected delivery date as well as misleading environmental claims.asa.org.uk—
Asav Consultancy Ltd t/a Vibes CBD2022-10-26Internet (website content)Four advertorials for a CBD oil seen on online news outlets, were banned for not being obviously identifiable as ads, making medicinal claims for unlicensed products and stating the product could prevasa.org.uk—
Planet Woo Ltd2022-10-26Internet (video)A YouTube pre-roll ad for a web series was inappropriately targeted and caused serious or widespread offence by featuring swearing and nudity and irresponsibly encouraged smoking.asa.org.uk—
Enigmaa Ltd t/a Blessed CBD2022-10-26Internet (website content)Four advertorials for a CBD oil seen on online news outlets, were banned for not being obviously identifiable as ads, making medicinal claims for unlicensed products and stating the product could prevasa.org.uk—
Q River Ltd2022-10-19Internet (website content)A website and Amazon product listing for a baby wipes product made misleading environmental claims about how biodegradable they were.asa.org.uk—
Global Media & Entertainment Ltd t/a Global2022-10-19Internet (website content)A website for a music singles chart misleadingly claimed that their music chart was “The Official Big Top 40” chart provider.asa.org.uk—
Clearpay Finance Ltd t/a Clearpay2022-10-19Social media (own site)Three Instagram posts for a buy now pay later provider irresponsibly encouraged people to spend more than they could afford.asa.org.uk—
HSBC UK Bank plc2022-10-19PosterHSBC UK Bank plc - Two posters for a bank that promoted its green initiatives omitted significant information about its contribution to carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions and were therefore masa.org.uk—
Guangzhou YH Sporting Goods Co Ltd t/a Young&Healthy2022-10-19Internet (website content)An ad appearing on online news sites for a clothing retailer, irresponsibly included images of a model who was, or seemed to be, under 18 years of age in a sexual manner.asa.org.uk—
Omega Pharma Ltd2022-10-19Television, VODA TV ad and a video on demand (VOD) ad for a nasal cleansing product, misleadingly claimed the product could cleanse away viruses and help protect against cold or ‘winter’ symptoms.asa.org.uk—
Jessica McCormack Ltd2022-10-12App (paid ad)A paid for ad on The Guardian app, for a jewellery company, irresponsibly portrayed a model as being unhealthily thin.asa.org.uk—
Lee Andrews Male Grooming2022-10-12Social media (own site)A Facebook post for a waxing and hair removal salon objectified women, which was likely to cause serious and widespread offence.asa.org.uk—
UAB BeWell EU t/a Nuubu2022-10-12Internet (website content)An ad for a foot patch company in a content discovery network which appeared in a news article on a local news website, misleadingly claimed that its detox patches would bring about weight loss.asa.org.uk—
Argos Ltd t/a Argos2022-10-12Website (own site)The retailer’s website made misleading claims about the exact numbers and times of recent sales and did not make clear that the availability of the product was extremely limited and restricted to certasa.org.uk—
Bill's Restaurants Ltd2022-10-12Email, Internet (website content)A marketing email and the restaurant’s website irresponsibly condoned or encouraged excessive drinking and unwise styles of drinking, including excessive drinking during a heatwave.asa.org.uk—
Clarson Ltd t/a Raffleaid2022-10-12Internet (website content), Social media (own site), Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Five Instagram stories, two Instagram posts and the website for a raffle and competition site misled participants, exaggerated consumers’ chances of winning the raffle and omitted information about thasa.org.uk—
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities2022-10-12Local or regional newspaper (ad feature), National newspaper (ad feature)Seven newspaper advertorials for the Department of Levelling Up, Housing and Communities were not obviously identifiable as ads.asa.org.uk—
FM Cosmetics Distribution UK Ltd t/a FM World2022-10-12Social media (own site)Three Facebook posts for employment opportunities with a cosmetics retailer made unsupported claims about the likely level of earnings that applicants could achieve.asa.org.uk—
Kim Constable Ltd t/a The Sculpted Vegan2022-10-05Website (own site), Social media (own site)A website and an Instagram post for a diet and fitness plan made misleading weight loss claims and discouraged treatment of the symptoms of menopause.asa.org.uk—
Vir Health Ltd t/a Numan2022-10-05TelevisionA TV ad for a hair loss treatment included a money-back guarantee which implied that the efficacy of the product was guaranteed.asa.org.uk—
Skylink Parking Services Ltd t/a Skylink Parking2022-10-05Internet (website content)A website for an airport parking facility misleadingly implied that cars were parked at secure locations that had CCTV and human patrols and which were registered with the Park Mark scheme.asa.org.uk—
Match.com International Ltd t/a Match.com, Ourtime2022-10-05VideoA TikTok post by a dating site perpetuated negative gender stereotypes which were likely to cause harm and widespread offence.asa.org.uk—
Gold Traders (UK) Ltd t/a The Britannia Coin Company2022-09-28Internet (website content)A page on the website of a coin company featured a promotion that was not administered fairly, as neither the prize described in the ad, or a reasonable equivalent was provided.asa.org.uk—
GOAT Company Ltd t/a Goat Games2022-09-28Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Twitter ad for a video game app was likely to cause serious or widespread offence by featuring a harmful gender stereotype and objectifying women.asa.org.uk—
Excel Charter Ltd t/a Excel Helicopters2022-09-28Internet (website content)The website for a helicopter charter company misleadingly claimed that they worked with the BBC and Sky News.asa.org.uk—
Brew York Ltd t/a Brew York2022-09-28Social media (own site)A tweet from a craft brewery’s account irresponsibly condoned and encouraged unwise styles of drinking, such as drinking at breakfast and made health claims about its products which are not permitted asa.org.uk—
Shenzhen Yuedong Mutual Entertainment Network Technology Co Ltd2022-09-28App (paid ad)An in-app ad for a mobile app game was found to be socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence by featuring a harmful gender stereotype that objectified and sexualised womasa.org.uk—
Screen With Envy Ltd2022-09-28EmailTwo emails from a furniture and accessories retailer misleadingly implied that any order over £200 would receive a 20% discount if they used a promotional code.asa.org.uk—
Oasis Games Ltd2022-09-28Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Twitter ad for a video game was socially irresponsible as it included a harmful gender stereotype, was likely to cause serious or widespread offence by objectifying and sexualising women anasa.org.uk—
Lindar Media Ltd t/a MRQ.com2022-09-21Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Reddit ad for a gaming website featuring cartoon Spiderman figures broke the strict gambling rules by having a particular appeal to under 18s.asa.org.uk—
2M Media SAS t/a Biolifix2022-09-21Internet (website content)Four ads for the company which were placed in a content discovery network and appeared in news articles on local news websites, made specific unauthorised health claims and misleading claims to prevenasa.org.uk—
Broadway Travel Service (Wimbledon) Ltd t/a Super Escapes Travel, Inspired Luxury Escapes2022-09-21Internet (website content)A website for a travel agency listed an “Ultra All Inclusive” board option which misleadingly implied it offered better accommodation than the “All Inclusive” board option.asa.org.uk—
Collab House Ltd2022-09-21Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)Two Instagram posts by Collab House Giveaways featured promotions that were not administered fairly.asa.org.uk—
Dr Sock Soothers Inc t/a socksoothers.com2022-09-21Internet (website content)An ad for a sock retailer misleadingly claimed that the product could relieve pain.asa.org.uk—
Eden Mill Distillery t/a Ramsay's Gin2022-09-21Social media (own site)An Instagram post and a Facebook post for Gin brand, made nutritional claims about its products which are not permitted for alcoholic drinks.asa.org.uk—
FLAB Ltd t/a Fat Lad At The Back2022-09-21Digital outdoorA digital billboard for a cycling clothing company was likely to cause serious or widespread offence and was found to be inappropriately targeted as the ad could be seen by people of all ages includinasa.org.uk—
Ferry Homely Ltd2022-09-21Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram story by the retailer was not obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
Meikles of Scotland Ltd t/a Stag's Breath Liqueur2022-09-21Social media (own site)A post on a Whisky brand’s Facebook page implied that drinking alcohol could help people overcome problems and suggested that drinking alcohol had therapeutic qualities.asa.org.uk—
Next Wave Ventures Ltd t/a Kyszer2022-09-21Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram story on influencer Chloe Ferry's account was not obviously identifiable as an ad as the #AD label was obscured.asa.org.uk—
Shop TJC Ltd t/a TJC, The Jewellery Channel Ltd2022-09-21TelevisionA presentation on The Jewellery Channel made medicinal claims for an unlicenced product and which could not be substantiated.asa.org.uk—
Tennent Caledonian Breweries UK Ltd2022-09-21Social media (paid ad), Social media (own site)Three Facebook posts for a lager brand made nutrition claims that are not permitted for alcoholic drinks.asa.org.uk—
Ugg Bugg Fashion Ltd t/a Missy Empire2022-09-21Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram story on influencer Chloe Ferry's account was not obviously identifiable as an ad, as it did not include a label such as #AD.asa.org.uk—
Simba Sleep Ltd2022-09-21Internet (website content)A product listing on a retailer’s website included unsubstantiated and misleading savings claims.asa.org.ukview
Ian Macleod Distillers Ltd2022-09-21Social media (own site)An Instagram post for a Whisky brand irresponsibly linked alcohol with driving and with a location and activity (a mechanic’s garage) in which drinking would be unsafe.asa.org.uk—
Stonegate Pub Company Ltd t/a Slug & Lettuce and Popworld2022-09-07—Two Facebook posts and an Instagram post broke the strict alcohol rules by irresponsibly encouraging excessive drinking and featuring people who appeared to be under 25 years of age.asa.org.uk—
Signature Pubs Ltd2022-09-07—Two posts on the cocktail bar’s Instagram account broke the strict alcohol rules by condoning and encouraging excessive drinking and featuring a person that appeared to be under 25 years of age.asa.org.uk—
Montpeliers (Edinburgh) Ltd2022-09-07—A TikTok post for the nightclub broke the strict alcohol rules by encouraging excessive drinking, showing alcohol being handled irresponsibly and featuring people who appeared to be under 25 years of asa.org.uk—
Furniture Village Ltd2022-09-07—Two product listings on the furniture retailer’s website misleadingly stated that the delivery of products would occur within 21 days.asa.org.uk—
Fred Templeman and partners t/a Templeman Opticians2022-09-07—A website for the Opticians misleadingly implied that they could formally test for and diagnose dyslexia and misleadingly claimed that visual stress caused dyslexia.asa.org.uk—
Elizabeth O'Donell2022-09-07—Two Instagram stories irresponsibly trivialised investing in cryptoassets by implying it was straightforward and took advantage of consumers’ inexperience of cryptoasset profits.asa.org.uk—
City Clubs (Edinburgh) Ltd t/a The Hive Nightclub & Venue2022-09-07—Three Instagram posts and a Facebook post for the nightclub broke the strict alcohol rules by irresponsibly encouraging excessive drinking.asa.org.uk—
The University of Leicester2022-09-07—A tweet for the university misleadingly claimed that their Arts and Humanities research was number 1 in the UK for overall research quality in the 2021 Research Effectiveness Framework.asa.org.uk—
Unilever UK Ltd2022-08-31TelevisionA TV ad for Persil washing liquid broke the rules by making misleading and unsubstantiated claims that the product was “kinder to our planet”.asa.org.uk—
Centre For Medical Sciences & Research Ltd2022-08-31Internet (website content)An ad on the training provider’s website was banned for misleadingly stating they were a Medical School and making unsubstantiated claims that they were a leading provider.asa.org.uk—
Higgs Technology Co Ltd2022-08-31App (paid ad)An in-app ad for a mobile app game was banned for being socially irresponsible and being likely to cause serious or widespread offence by objectifying and sexualising women.asa.org.uk—
Toyota (GB) plc2022-08-24National newspaper (ad feature)A newspaper ad by the car manufacturer for its Toyota GR Series broke the rules by condoning and encouraging unsafe and irresponsible driving.asa.org.uk—
Secret Surgery Aesthetics t/a secretsurgeryaesthetics2022-08-24Social media (own site)A post on the company’s Facebook page was banned for advertising Biotin jabs, a prescription-only medicine, to the public.asa.org.uk—
Wild Drinks Group Ltd t/a Whisp Drinks2022-08-17Social media (own site)An Instagram post by a hard seltzer retailer was banned for irresponsibly encouraging excessive drinking, implying that the product could prevent a hangover and making nutrition claims that were not pasa.org.uk—
Sensilab d.o.o.2022-08-17Social media (paid ad)Two paid-for Facebook posts for diet supplement retailer Slimjoy irresponsibly exploited people’s insecurities around body image and made unauthorised health claims.asa.org.uk—
Playorcas2022-08-17App (paid ad)An in-game ad for the mobile app game Infinity 8 Ball featured an offensive gender stereotype by objectifying and sexualising women and was targeted irresponsibly.asa.org.uk—
Outside In (Cambridge) Ltd t/a Lumie2022-08-17Internet (website content)Claims on a website and a product listing on Amazon misleadingly implied that Vitamin L SAD was a source of vitamin which offered health benefits.asa.org.uk—
MOS Media Ltd2022-08-17Internet (website content), Social media (own site)A tweet and a listing on the company’s website for vitamin B12 injections broke the rules by promoting prescription-only medicines to the public and (the tweet) for not being obviously identifiable asasa.org.uk—
Home Instead Ltd2022-08-17Social media (paid ad), Internet (website content)A paid-for ad on Facebook for a home health care company and a job listing on its website made misleading claims about flexible working.asa.org.uk—
Sussex Promotions2022-08-17Magazine (ad feature), Internet (website content)A magazine ad, eBay product listing and an ad on the company’s website were banned for making misleading and unsubstantiated claims that Fuel Diamond could prevent stale fuel or neutralise ethanol, anasa.org.uk—
Boux Avenue Ltd2022-08-10Social media (own site)A post on the company’s Facebook page was irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence by objectifying womenasa.org.uk—
American Golf (Trading) Ltd t/a Onlinegolf2022-08-10Website (own site)A website of an online golf retailer misled consumers by omitting significant information about a free trial for a shot tracking device because it did not make clear they would have to pay a subscriptasa.org.uk—
Arsenal Football Club plc2022-08-10Website (own site)[Republished ruling] A Facebook post and website post by Arsenal Football Club promoting fan tokens were misleading because they did not make sufficiently clear that the value of investments in paid-fasa.org.uk—
BetterHelp, Inc t/a BetterHelp.com2022-08-10Social media (paid ad)A paid-for ad on Facebook for an online counselling and therapy provider made misleading and irresponsible claims about NHS waiting times and discouraged people with mental health conditions from seekasa.org.uk—
Huel Ltd2022-08-10Audio (podcast)A podcast ad was banned as the commercial intent behind it was not made clear upfront and it was not obviously identifiable as an adasa.org.uk—
ITAE Productions Ltd t/a The VIVIT Experience ; VIVIT2022-08-10EmailAn email for a Father’s Day promotion that featured a picture Fred West was banned for being likely to cause serious or widespread offence and distressasa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a Heezes.com2022-08-10Social media (paid ad)A paid-for Facebook ad for corset-style shapewear was irresponsible by exploiting people’s insecurities around body image, particularly new mothers, and encouraging rapid post-partum weight loss; mislasa.org.uk—
Prettylittlething.com Ltd t/a Prettylittlething.com2022-08-10Website (own site)Images on a fast-fashion retailer’s website featuring Alabama Barker were socially irresponsible and likely to cause harm and offence by depicting an under 18 in a sexual mannerasa.org.uk—
Sky UK Ltd2022-08-10Email, Internet (website content)Claims on a website and in an email about being the “top-performing major broadband provider” and which implied Sky had won an award from Ofcom were misleadingasa.org.ukview
Lebara Mobile Ltd t/a Lebara Ltd2022-08-10Website (own site)Claims on the company’s website for its 30-day SIM-only plans were misleading because the “unlimited” minutes and text services were subject to a cap on usageasa.org.uk—
Elite Aesthetic Clinic Ltd2022-08-03Social media (own site)Three ads on social media were banned for advertising Kenalog, a prescription-only treatment.asa.org.uk—
UK Flooring Direct Ltd2022-08-03Internet (website content)An ad on the company’s website misleadingly implied a particular savings offer was time-sensitive.asa.org.uk—
Tonic Weight Loss Surgery Ltd2022-08-03Social media (own site)A post on the company’s Instagram page irresponsibly trivialised the decision to have weight-loss surgery by creating a sense of undue urgency.asa.org.uk—
Rank Digital Gaming (Alderney) Ltd2022-08-03App (paid ad)An in-app ad for a mobile casino game irresponsibly suggested that gambling was a way to solve financial concerns and achieve financial security.asa.org.uk—
PlanetArt UK Ltd t/a FreePrints2022-08-03App (own claim)An ad on the company’s app misleadingly told consumers they could get free photo prints, without mentioning postage charges.asa.org.uk—
PCK SKIN (Manchester) Ltd t/a SkinSpaceUK2022-08-03Internet (website content)An ad on the company’s website stated that treatment could eliminate dark circles around the eyes without sufficient evidenceasa.org.uk—
LC International Ltd t/a Coral2022-08-03TelevisionA TV ad for Corals advertised gambling irresponsibly.asa.org.uk—
JC Atkinson & Son Ltd2022-08-03Internet (website content)An ad on the company’s website misleadingly implied that their MDF coffins were more eco-friendly than other options, without sufficient evidence.asa.org.uk—
Golden Leaves Ltd2022-08-03Internet (website content)An ad on the company’s website misleadingly implied that their MDF coffins were more eco-friendly than other options, without sufficient evidence.asa.org.uk—
FlexFuel-Energy Development2022-08-03Internet (website content)An ad on the company’s website misleadingly implied that misleadingly implied that a hydrogen-injection treatment for engines could reduce carbon emissions without evidence.asa.org.uk—
Fanatics (International) Ltd2022-08-03Internet (website content)A website promotion was misleading because customers had not received the discount on the advertised product when using a promotional code.asa.org.uk—
The Trade Centre Group plc t/a The Trade Centre UK, The Trade Centre Wales2022-07-27RadioA radio ad misleadingly claimed hundreds of cars were available to purchase for £20 a week.asa.org.uk—
HeyNutrition Ltd2022-07-27Internet (sponsored search)Three paid-for ads on Google search falsely implied that the marketer was acting for purposes outside its business and did not make their commercial intent clear.asa.org.uk—
BetterCo Ltd2022-07-27Internet (sponsored search)Three paid-for ads on Google search falsely implied that the marketer was acting for purposes outside its business and did not make their commercial intent clear.asa.org.uk—
Ella Kate Reeves2022-07-27Social media (own site)Two Facebook pages for Ella Reeves misleadingly claimed she was accredited to the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy.asa.org.uk—
Gamer Advantage LLC2022-07-27Internet (video)An ad aired during a livestream on Twitch made misleading claims that blue-light glasses could improve sleep quality.asa.org.uk—
JA Physique Ltd t/a jakeabbott072022-07-27Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An ad on Jake Abbott’s Instagram was irresponsible as it exploited young people’s insecurities about body image.asa.org.uk—
Purolabs Nutrition Ltd t/a Purolabs2022-07-27Internet (sponsored search)Two paid-for ads on Google search falsely implied that the marketer was acting for purposes outside its business and did not make their commercial intent clear.asa.org.uk—
AA Ltd2022-07-20Poster, Website (own site)A poster and website ad contained inaccurate claims that AA was the UK’s ‘largest provider’ for breakdown services, which could not be verified.asa.org.uk—
SmokePops LDN2022-07-20Social media (paid ad)Three ads on Facebook and the company’s website for flavoured additives for cigarettes irresponsibly promoted smoking and contained misleading, irresponsible health claims.asa.org.uk—
Weybury Hildreth Ltd t/a Purflo2022-07-20Internet (website content)A website ad misleadingly claimed that a baby bed was certified for safe sleeping, and claimed that the product met specific British Safety Standards which were not fully applicable for the product.asa.org.uk—
London Planters2022-07-20Website (own site)An ad on the company’s website misleadingly implied a product was of their own design, rather than designed by a third party.asa.org.uk—
Lidl Great Britain Ltd2022-07-13LeafletA leaflet by a supermarket made misleading claims about the prices at which various products were generally sold (recommended retail prices).asa.org.uk—
Secret Surgery Ltd2022-07-13Social media (own site)Ads on Instagram and Facebook promoted a prescription-only medicine and irresponsibly put pressure on consumers to have Botox procedures.asa.org.uk—
Pure Wines Ltd2022-07-13Social media (paid ad)An ad on Instagram and the company’s website broke the strict alcohol ad rules by linking alcohol with seduction and sexual activity.asa.org.uk—
Prettylittlething.com Ltd t/a Prettylittlething.com2022-07-13Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram story on Molly-Mae Hague’s account did not make clear and upfront the commercial intent behind it and was not obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
Astrasoft Projects Ltd2022-07-13Internet (display)Three online display ads for an online dating service depicting Ukrainian Women were likely to cause serious offence by highlighting their vulnerability and connecting it to their sexual appeal.asa.org.uk—
DNBA Entertainment Ltd2022-07-13Social media (paid ad)An Instagram post encouraged unsafe and irresponsible behaviour by linking alcohol with driving.asa.org.uk—
OneSoft Studio2022-07-06Game (mobile/app)Two in-game mobile ads were banned for objectifying women, condoning sexual assault and encouraging sexual violence.asa.org.uk—
Fox Milton & Co Ltd t/a Unique Funeral Plans2022-07-06Internet (website content), Social media (own site)Ads on the website homepage, Facebook and Twitter accounts for Unique Funeral Plans misleadingly implied a relationship with Sterling Trust Corporation that did not exist.asa.org.uk—
Kane & Ross Clinics Ltd2022-07-06Internet (website content)An ad on Kane & Ross Clinics’ website misleadingly implied osteopathy for babies could treat constipation and infections.asa.org.uk—
Wild Drinks Group Ltd t/a Whisp Drinks2022-06-29Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)We banned an ad on Rosie Breen’s TikTok page for making health claims about an alcoholic product, encouraging excessive drinking and featuring someone under 25 years of age.asa.org.uk—
Paramount UK Partnership t/a Comedy Central, Paramount Comedy Channel2022-06-29Internet (video)A pre-roll ad on YouTube for a Comedy Central programme was likely to cause serious offence and was irresponsibly targeted.asa.org.uk—
Relx (UK) Ltd2022-06-29Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)An Instagram story on Louis Shaw’s account was not obviously identifiable as an ad and promoted unlicensed, nicotine-containing e-cigarettes on social media.asa.org.uk—
Prettylittlething.com Ltd t/a Prettylittlething.com2022-06-22Internet (website content)We upheld complaints about an online product listing for a pair of jeans, as it objectified women.asa.org.uk—
OPTILASE (UK) LIMITED2022-06-22Website (own site), Internet (sponsored search)An online promotion for laser eye surgery was found to be misleading and irresponsible.asa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a Good Health Today2022-06-22Website (own site), Internet (sponsored search)We banned an online ad for a company claiming to be able to treat depression and other medical conditions, over unsubstantiated claims over treatments’ efficacy.asa.org.uk—
Capri Sun GmbH2022-06-15Internet (website content)A banner ad was unlikely to be obviously identifiable as such by its audience, young children, and therefore ‘enhanced’ disclosure was required.asa.org.uk—
U K Insurance Ltd t/a Churchill2022-06-15Internet (website content)A banner ad was unlikely to be obviously identifiable as such by its audience - young children, and therefore ‘enhanced’ disclosure was required.asa.org.uk—
Ten Percent Music Elite Group Ltd t/a TPM the Label2022-06-15Social media (own site)An Instagram post promoting a prize draw did not award prizes as described and was not administered fairly.asa.org.uk—
Take Stock Foods Ltd2022-06-15Social media (paid ad)A paid-for TikTok post for a soup company broke the rules by claiming that its food products could treat or cure acne.asa.org.uk—
PPB Counterparty Services Ltd t/a Paddy Power2022-06-15Television, VODA TV and VOD ad by a bookmaker broke the rules by portraying gambling as taking priority in life over family and encouraging repetitive or frequent participation in gambling.asa.org.uk—
IMC Toys UK Ltd2022-06-15Internet (website content)A banner ad was unlikely to be obviously identifiable as such by its audience, young children, and therefore ‘enhanced’ disclosure was required.asa.org.uk—
IMC Toys UK Ltd2022-06-15Internet (website content)A banner ad was unlikely to be obviously identifiable as such by its audience, young children, and therefore ‘enhanced’ disclosure was required.asa.org.uk—
First Trenitalia West Coast Rail Ltd t/a Avanti West Coast2022-06-15Internet (website content)A website for a train company made misleading claims that its ticket prices could not be beaten.asa.org.uk—
Trailfinders Ltd2022-06-15BrochureA holiday brochure was misleading because it did not make it sufficiently clear that special offers on free nights and free room upgrades were subject to restrictions.asa.org.ukview
Tesco Stores Ltd t/a Tesco2022-06-08Television, Newspaper, VOD, RadioA cross-media ad (TV, radio, Twitter, press, VOD, website) by Tesco made misleading claims that Plant Chef products could make a positive environmental difference to the planet compared to their meat asa.org.uk—
Sky UK Ltd2022-06-08Poster, TelevisionA TV and a poster ad for Sky Mobile was likely to mislead because Sky UK Ltd did not provide objective comparative evidence to substantiate its claim that it was the perfect network.asa.org.ukview
Evergreens (UK) Ltd t/a ArtificialGrass.com2022-06-08Internet (website content), Internet (video)A website and two YouTube video ads for artificial grass were misleading as they overstated the environmental benefits and air purifying qualities of the products.asa.org.uk—
Partex Global GmbH2022-06-08Internet (website content)A website for auto parts omitted material information about the advertiser’s geographical location and misleadingly implied that the advertiser was based in the UK, when that was not the case.asa.org.uk—
Ayoomi Technology Co Ltd2022-06-01App (paid ad)An in-game ad was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence for objectifying women or presenting them as stereotyped sexual objects and featuring implied non-consensual asa.org.uk—
Verisure Services (UK) Ltd t/a Verisure2022-06-01Website (own site)Claims on a website by a provider of security alarms that it offered the best alarm technology on the market were misleading and were not verifiable.asa.org.uk—
Cellar Door Ltd t/a OrchidRomance2022-06-01Internet (video)A paid-for YouTube ad for an online introduction agency portrayed a female model, who seemed to be under 18 years of age, in a sexual way and was therefore irresponsible.asa.org.uk—
Bier Nuts Ltd t/a Bier Company2022-05-25Email, Text MessageAn email and a text message for a mail order beer subscription service misled consumers by falsely claiming or implying they had won a prize of “free beer for life”.asa.org.uk—
Stephen Bear t/a Pink Panther Models2022-05-25Internet (website content)A website for an adult webcam modelling recruitment agency made misleading earnings claims and inaccurate statement about the organisation’s experience in the sector.asa.org.uk—
Stacey Bradley2022-05-25NewspaperTwo local press ads, one print and one digital, misleadingly implied they had been placed, endorsed or approved by a public body and misleadingly implied COVID-19 vaccinations were unsafe and illegal.asa.org.uk—
Magnatech Technology Ltd2022-05-25Internet (website content)A website for a company providing magnet technology for boiler systems made misleading claims the product would improve fuel efficiency, thereby saving energy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.asa.org.uk—
CheaperWaste Ltd2022-05-18Internet (website content)A website that included a page for comparing waste companies did not make clear it was for the purposes of lead generation, misleadingly presented the nature of the services office and implied that thasa.org.uk—
Get Hard Ltd2022-05-18PosterAn outdoor poster for an online sex store was overtly sexual and because it was displayed in an untargeted medium was likely to cause serious and widespread offence and was irresponsible.asa.org.uk—
Liquid Lipo Ltd2022-05-18Website (own site)A product listing on a website that claimed a gel could assist with the reduction of body fat was misleading as the advertiser did not provide robust clinical evidence to prove its efficacy.asa.org.uk—
ARSJ Holding Ltd2022-05-11Internet (on own site), Social media (paid ad)We upheld complaints against health claims in an ad for Brite Drinks.asa.org.uk—
Adidas UK Ltd t/a Adidas2022-05-11Poster, Social media (own site)We upheld complaints against ads containing nudity.asa.org.uk—
Brand Evangelists for Beauty Ltd2022-05-11Social media (own site)We banned an ad for making claims about a caffeinated hair product that couldn’t be substantiated.asa.org.uk—
Lucy Isabella Beauty & Aesthetics t/a Lucy Isabella2022-05-11Social media (own site)We banned an ad for advertising Kenalog, a prescription-only medicine, to the public.asa.org.uk—
PEL Consultancy Services Ltd t/a PEL Investigations2022-05-11Search (paid)We banned an ad for a private investigation agency for having unsubstantiated claims.asa.org.uk—
Sarean Aesthetics2022-05-11Social media (own site)We banned ads for advertising prescription-only medicine to the public.asa.org.uk—
Shop Direct Home Shopping Ltd t/a Very, very.co.uk, Littlewoods, littlewoods.com2022-05-11RadioThis ruling replaces one from November 2021; however, we have continued to uphold the complaint.asa.org.uk—
The Skin Clinic Faversham t/a The Skin Clinic2022-05-11Social media (own site)We banned ads for marketing prescription-only medicine to the public.asa.org.uk—
Transform Hospital Group Ltd t/a Transform2022-05-11EmailWe banned an ad for trivialising plastic surgery.asa.org.uk—
UAB Ekomlita t/a nuubu2022-05-11Internet (display)We partly upheld complaints against ads for kitchen knives.asa.org.uk—
Skincodes Aesthetics2022-05-11Social media (own site)We banned ads for marketing prescription-only medicine to the public.asa.org.uk—
My Pharmacy (UK) Ltd2022-05-04Website (own site)We upheld complaints about ads for a vitamin supplement .asa.org.uk—
Barton Park Estates Ltd t/a Devon Oaks Park; Seascapes2022-05-04TelevisionAn ad for luxury park homes was banned for being misleading.asa.org.uk—
Oneade2022-05-04Social media (own site)We banned an ad for using filters to exaggerate a beauty product’s efficacy.asa.org.uk—
Jaguar Land Rover Ltd2022-05-04TelevisionWe banned ads for suggesting a parking sensor could alert drivers to a cliff edge.asa.org.uk—
Leisure Wear Ltd t/a SnuggyUK2022-05-04Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)We banned ads for hooded blankets on Jake Quickenden’s Instagram profile for not being clearly identifiable as ads.asa.org.uk—
Lamb & Co. Property Ltd2022-04-27PosterAn outdoor poster for an estate agents was banned for being likely to cause offence.asa.org.uk—
Mondelez UK Ltd2022-04-27Internet (website content)A website ad for a Cadburys promotion was banned for omitting significant terms and conditions.asa.org.uk—
LeMieux Ltd2022-04-27Internet (website content)A website ad for a food supplement for female horses, which included an offensive gender stereotype, was banned for being likely to cause serious offence.asa.org.uk—
The Otley Burger Company2022-04-20Social media (own site)A tweet, an Instagram and a Facebook post by The Otley Burger Company which referenced the disappearance of Madeleine McCann was banned for being likely to cause serious and widespread offence and disasa.org.uk—
Surfshark Ltd2022-04-20Internet (video)A YouTube video ad by Surfshark was banned for being likely to cause fear or distress without justifiable reason.asa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a TretDirect2022-04-20Social media (own site)Six Instagram posts by an acne treatment provider were banned for promoting prescription-only medicines to the general public.asa.org.uk—
Transform Hospital Group Ltd t/a Transform2022-04-13Social media (own site)We banned an ad for breast augmenation for being socially irresponsible.asa.org.uk—
Stillbloom Ltd2022-04-13Internet (video)An ad for lead generation service CleverKeith has been banned for misleading advertising.asa.org.uk—
AppQuantum Publishing Ltd2022-04-13Social media (paid ad)We upheld a complaint against an ad for a mobile game that showed inaccurate gameplay footage.asa.org.uk—
TIER Operations Ltd2022-04-06—A poster ad for an electric scooter hire company was banned for making misleading environmental claims.asa.org.uk—
ABI Global Ltd2022-04-06—An in-game ad for a mobile app game was banned for being likely to cause widespread offence by objectifying women.asa.org.uk—
Sighthound Welfare UK Ltd t/a C.A.G.E.D2022-04-06—A billboard ad for a greyhound welfare pressure group was banned for being misleading.asa.org.uk—
Renourish Ltd2022-04-06—A poster ad for vegan soup was banned for being likely to cause serious or widespread offence.asa.org.uk—
Stephen Bear t/a stevie bear2022-03-30Social media (own site)A tweet by Stephen Bear about a promotion broke the CAP Code as the promotion was not administered fairly.asa.org.uk—
In The Style Fashion Ltd t/a In the Style2022-03-30Social media (own site)Posts by Lorna Luxe on Instagram were banned for not being obviously identifiable as ads.asa.org.uk—
Health Technologies Ltd2022-03-30Website (own site), Social media (own site)Three ads for a Covid-19 testing service were banned for being misleading.asa.org.uk—
Currys Group Ltd2022-03-30Internet (video)A pre-roll YouTube ad for Currys which showed people riding e-scooters was banned for irresponsibly suggesting that electric scooters could be used in public places in the UK.asa.org.uk—
Chinnock Housing Ltd2022-03-30Direct mailA direct mailing for a property company was banned for not being obviously identifiable as an ad.asa.org.uk—
Bighams Ltd2022-03-30Packaging (promotion)A product packaging ad promoting a competition to win a campervan broke the CAP Code as the promotion was not administered fairly.asa.org.uk—
In The Style Fashion Ltd t/a In the Style2022-03-23Website (own site), Social media (own site)Two Instagram Stories and a website ad for an online clothing brand were banned for making misleading price claims.asa.org.uk—
Mondelez UK Ltd t/a Cadbury2022-03-16Internet (website content)A promotion for a Cadbury competition breached the CAP Code because they were unable to provide the full names of the judges on request.asa.org.uk—
Emma Matratzen GmbH t/a Emma Mattress2022-03-16Poster, Internet (website content)A website and poster ad for mattresses were banned for making misleading savings claims.asa.org.uk—
PPB Counterparty Services Ltd t/a Paddy Power2022-03-09RadioA radio ad for Paddy Power was banned because the terms and conditions were not presented in a clear and intelligible manner.asa.org.uk—
Moneysupermarket.com Ltd2022-03-09RadioA radio ad for moneysupermarket.com was banned because the terms and conditions were not presented in a clear and intelligible manner.asa.org.uk—
Ziglu Ltd2022-03-09Digital outdoorA digital poster for Ziglu, an online cryptocurrency platform, was banned because it took advantage of consumers’ inexperience and because it was likely to cause unjustifiable distress.asa.org.uk—
Witcombe Festival2022-03-02Social media (own site)An Instagram post by the Witcombe Festival for a promotion to win tickets to the festival was banned because the promotion was not administered fairly.asa.org.uk—
Back to Normal2022-03-02Website (own site)A website post and GoFundMe page for the anti-lockdown campaign group Back to Normal was banned for making misleading claims about the effectiveness of ivermectin in treating COVID-19.asa.org.uk—
Floki Inu2022-03-02PosterA poster for Floki Inu, a cryptocurrency, was banned for trivialising investment in cryptocurrency and for taking advantage of consumers’ lack of experience or credulity.asa.org.uk—
The Detox Clinic Ltd2022-03-02Website (own site)A website ad promoting IV Ozone Therapy was banned for making medicinal claims without holding substantive evidence to support those claims.asa.org.uk—
Nutricia Ltd2022-02-23Audio (podcast)A podcast ad was banned because it confused between infant formula and follow-on formula and for making health claims for infant formula.asa.org.uk—
Innocent Ltd t/a Innocent2022-02-23Television, VODA video on demand ad, a paid-for YouTube and a TV ad for Innocent drinks was banned for exaggerating the total environmental benefit of the products.asa.org.uk—
Person(s) unknown t/a No More Silence2022-02-16DirectoryAn ad in a local business directory was banned for implying that the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was unsafe for children.asa.org.uk—
Boohoo.com UK Ltd2022-02-16Internet (website content)A product listing by Boohoo was banned for being likely to cause serious or widespread offence or harm by objectifying women.asa.org.uk—
Steven Thomas2022-02-02—A local press ad placed by Steven Thomas, seen in the Forest of Dean and Wye Valley Review, The Forester and the Cheltenham Post in September and October 2021 featured the headline “Do you know about asa.org.uk—
Rental Republic Ltd2022-01-19Website (own site)A website post by the holiday rental company Travelopo was banned for stating that they were the number one holiday website globally without holding adequate comparative evidence to support this claimasa.org.uk—
Mondelez UK Ltd2022-01-19VODA video on demand ad for Dairylea was banned for encouraging children to eat while hanging upside now, which is unsafe behaviour that could be dangerous for children to emulate.asa.org.uk—
Mamnick2022-01-19Social media (own site)A tweet by a clothing retailer advertising cycling kit was banned for glamorising guns.asa.org.uk—
Pepsi Lipton International2022-01-19PosterA poster advertising Lipton Ice Tea was banned for misleadingly claiming that the bottle was made from 100% recycled plastic.asa.org.uk—
Best Direct (International) Ltd t/a Best Direct2022-01-12TelevisionA teleshopping presentation advertising beauty products was banned for making misleading claims about the company’s refund policy.asa.org.uk—
Forisgfs UK Ltd t/a Crypto.com2022-01-05App (paid ad)Two in-app ads for Crypto.com were banned for not being sufficiently clear that the value of investments in cryptocurrency was variable and for irresponsibly encouraging investing in cryptocurrency thasa.org.uk—

Source: Advertising Standards Authority upheld rulings, published at asa.org.uk. Not published under the Open Government Licence, and not affiliated with the ASA.