ComplaintCensus
More

Flow Google: most-reported complaints

Complaints in recent reviews
83% of 6 recent reviews analysed
Most-reported issue
Faulty product 80% of complaints
Company replies
0% of negative reviews, typically within a day
TrustScore
2.4 from 6 total reviews
Review window analysed
2026-09-25 to 2026-11-04 6 reviews

Automated analysis of 6 public Trustpilot reviews published 2026-09-25 to 2026-11-04. TrustScore 2.4 from 6 total reviews — see the Trustpilot page. Quick answer: is Flow Google legit? Issues below reflect what reviewers reported, not findings of wrongdoing.

Reviewers most often report that the product is faulty, with four out of five complaints citing this issue. Specifically, users note that the device frequently ignores specific instructions and fails to follow basic prompts. A trend cannot be established yet due to the limited number of reviews.

Trustpilot lists this business as no longer collecting reviews. New reviews are not currently being gathered for its profile. See the Trustpilot page for the current status.

Not enough reviews to establish a trend.

What are the most common complaints about Flow Google?

Complaint categories for Flow Google, with share, count, trend and monthly pattern
IssueShareCountTrendBy month
Faulty product
80%
4

Faulty product

4 reports · 80% of complaints
“Fails to follow basic prompts: It frequently ignores specific instructions”
1-star review · 2026-11-01 · Trustpilot · Verbatim
“The video editor is making too often mistakes”
2-star review · 2026-11-01 · Trustpilot · Verbatim
“Almost spend my month credits for a simple 8 sec video clip and still it's not what is expected.”
1-star review · 2026-10-31 · Trustpilot · Verbatim
5complaints identified
83%of recent reviews analysed
0%of negative reviews get a company reply, typically within a day

The company has not claimed its Trustpilot profile. We last checked this profile on 2026-11-10 and found 0 new reviews. These are facts Trustpilot publishes about the profile, as of our last harvest.

Forum footprint: 0 MoneySavingExpert forum discussions mention this company (browse). Roughly 0 of the top, relevance-sorted search results were posted in the last 90 days — an approximate figure by construction, not a true recency count.

TrustScore over time

TrustScore history: 2026-10-02 3.2 → 2026-11-07 2.42.02.53.03.52026-10-022026-10-232026-11-012026-11-042026-11-072.4

3.2 → 2.4 across 5 census measurements since 2026-10-02. Our own record, independent of Trustpilot’s display.

Reply behaviour over time

Solid: % of negative reviews replied to. Dashed: typical days to reply. Both as reported on this company’s Trustpilot profile, recorded whenever our census re-checked it and a figure had changed — the gaps between points are not equal:

Show all 5 dated readings

2026-10-02 (0%, 0.0d) · 2026-10-23 (0%, 0.0d) · 2026-11-01 (0%, 0.0d) · 2026-11-04 (0%, 0.0d) · 2026-11-07 (0%, 0.0d).

Sector benchmark: faulty product makes up 80% of this company’s complaints vs a 29% median across 43 ranked companies in its sector.

Review velocity: 6 of this company’s 6 Trustpilot reviews (100%) were written in the last 12 months.

Other UK companies with evidenced “Faulty product” complaints

See all companies by issue: Faulty product · Sector table: Telecoms & IT in the UK

Method: reviews are classified into a fixed complaint taxonomy by an automated reader; every category shown is backed by at least two verbatim quotes from distinct reviews. Trends are computed from dated review counts only. Negative reviews are deliberately over-sampled for evidence depth; headline percentages use an unbiased recent sample only. Report updated 2026-11-07.