SkyHawker: most-reported complaints
Automated analysis of 100 public Trustpilot reviews published 2026-01-24 to 2026-08-17. TrustScore 4.9 from 196 total reviews — see the Trustpilot page. Quick answer: is SkyHawker legit? Issues below reflect what reviewers reported, not findings of wrongdoing.
Based on 100 Trustpilot reviews analysed, no complaint pattern has enough evidence yet to report for SkyHawker.
How to reach SkyHawker
These are the contact details SkyHawker publishes on its Trustpilot profile, as of our last check on 2026-09-25 — phone +18772902585, email [email protected], address 8 The Green STE B, Dover, 19901, US.
The company claimed its Trustpilot profile on 2024-10-27 and last replied to a negative review on 2026-07-15. Trustpilot ranks it 51 of 199 in Travel Agency. We last checked this profile on 2026-09-25 and found 0 new reviews. These are facts Trustpilot publishes about the profile, as of our last harvest.
Elsewhere: 5★ on Google (8 reviews)
TrustScore over time
4.9 → 4.9 across 9 census measurements since 2026-08-17. Our own record, independent of Trustpilot’s display.
Reply behaviour over time
Solid: % of negative reviews replied to. Dashed: typical days to reply. Both as reported on this company’s Trustpilot profile, recorded whenever our census re-checked it and a figure had changed — the gaps between points are not equal: 2026-08-18 (100%, 3.0d) · 2026-08-21 (100%, 3.0d) · 2026-08-25 (100%, 3.0d) · 2026-09-03 (100%, 3.0d) · 2026-09-09 (100%, 3.0d) · 2026-09-13 (100%, 3.0d) · 2026-09-16 (100%, 3.0d) · 2026-09-21 (100%, 3.0d).
Review provenance: 74 company-invited reviews in the recent window average 4.88★, while 39 organic (uninvited) reviews average 5.00★.
85% of its 108 recent 5★ reviews came from accounts that had written only that one review when we captured it (the median across companies is about 39%). A high share is a reason to look closer, not evidence of fake reviews.
Review velocity: 152 of this company’s 196 Trustpilot reviews (78%) were written in the last 12 months.
Not enough reviews to establish a trend.
Not enough evidenced complaints yet to report specific failure modes for this company.
Method: reviews are classified into a fixed complaint taxonomy by an automated reader; every category shown is backed by at least two verbatim quotes from distinct reviews. Trends are computed from dated review counts only. Negative reviews are deliberately over-sampled for evidence depth; headline percentages use an unbiased recent sample only. Report updated 2026-08-19.